Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,338
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 122:
Line 122: + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia:User complaints (view source)
Revision as of 05:43, September 15, 2023
, 05:43, September 15, 2023→Bad faith editing
:::Like I said, a significant amount of research shows that people who make political pronouncements and predictions and are good at it use [[critical thinking]] and actively try to falsify their ideas/predictions (See: [[Essay: Why did so many self-appointed geopolitics experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?]]). What they often do is keep a record and try to learn from their mistakes. I politely asked you to provide me some of the mistakes you have made in relation to your political pronouncements/predictions and received no reply from you. Instead, you falsely claimed that you don't make political predictions and I demonstrated that this was untrue by showing you some of your past political predictions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:22, September 15, 2023 (EDT)
:::Like I said, a significant amount of research shows that people who make political pronouncements and predictions and are good at it use [[critical thinking]] and actively try to falsify their ideas/predictions (See: [[Essay: Why did so many self-appointed geopolitics experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?]]). What they often do is keep a record and try to learn from their mistakes. I politely asked you to provide me some of the mistakes you have made in relation to your political pronouncements/predictions and received no reply from you. Instead, you falsely claimed that you don't make political predictions and I demonstrated that this was untrue by showing you some of your past political predictions. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:22, September 15, 2023 (EDT)
::::(ec) You think I don't understand critical thinking? Look at the [[Frankfurt School]] or [[Herbert Marcuse]] articles. Or [[Fridrich Neuman]] (a founder of the West German state, which was translated into German for the German wiki). I'm way ahead of you (don't mean to boast). I understand critical thinking from both sides.
::::I'm not in the business of forecasting or making predictions. First and foremost of all, I'm into history. Back 10 years ago, i got so tired of Ratvandals pestering me about what I thought about [[Sarah Palin]], I finally decided to abandon historical research and writing and focus on being a contemporary chronicler. I've given up hope of every returning to my first love, history, and take what I know of and apply to contemporary events (like the idiots who think they can get way calling Putin a communist or the Russian Federation a re-creation of the USSR WITHOUT being called Nazis).
::::You finally, today or yesterday, admitted the world is in a transitionary period. Fine. Why don't you apply your interest in research skills to working with me to map out where we are today, and what are the likely scenarios we could be headed into (rather than pursuing these pointless, personal vendettas)?
::::I uploaded much, very much information on what has now ultimately become the [[SWIFT]] network. It originated in the 1980s. And I find that info fascinating (although I haven't looked at any of it in 7 or 8 years now). But that background information would be an eyeopener for anyone helping out on the SWIFT network.
::::[[BRICS]] is the alternative now to the SWIFT network. And as the SWIFT network faulters in coming years, it will affect your living standards, and US politics. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 01:43, September 15, 2023 (EDT)