Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Conservapedia:User complaints (view source)

Revision as of 13:55, September 15, 2023

28,417 bytes added ,  13:55, September 15, 2023
→‎Bad faith editing
Line 165: Line 165:     
:If you ever get interested in doing the [[SWIFT]] network, it was built using the stolen PROMIS software from [[INSLAW]] that Hillary Clinton was the intellectual property lawyer for in the 1980s. ([[Bank_of_Credit_and_Commerce_International#Inslaw_Inc_and_the_PROMIS_software]]). Today it's used by 12,000 banks worldwide, and is the system that prohibits Russians from doing business in dollars worldwide, enforcing [[Russian sanctions]], and why [[BRICS]] came into existence to bybass the SWIFT network and get around sanctions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 02:53, September 15, 2023 (EDT)
 
:If you ever get interested in doing the [[SWIFT]] network, it was built using the stolen PROMIS software from [[INSLAW]] that Hillary Clinton was the intellectual property lawyer for in the 1980s. ([[Bank_of_Credit_and_Commerce_International#Inslaw_Inc_and_the_PROMIS_software]]). Today it's used by 12,000 banks worldwide, and is the system that prohibits Russians from doing business in dollars worldwide, enforcing [[Russian sanctions]], and why [[BRICS]] came into existence to bybass the SWIFT network and get around sanctions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 02:53, September 15, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Incessant trolling==
 +
''Moved to: [[Conservapedia:User_complaints]]''
 +
 +
Andy, please intervene. This trolling has gone on for 6 hours. I thought we had it resolved. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:42, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
Just put the article on Auto Read. It'll take less than 5 minutes. You decide if it is not well researched or slanderous. [[Bill Browder]].  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:44, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
Andy, please put a stop to this incessant trolling. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_Browder&diff=prev&oldid=1979796] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:55, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
:This is so simple to resolve. Provide a single reliable source saying that Bill Browder is communist and then reinsert your claim. So far you haven't even provided a single source - let alone a reliable source. You haven't even provided a blog post or social media post for your claim. You have found zero sources for your claim that Bill Browder is a communist. This is inappropriate behavior. You can't make things up out of thin air merely because you want them to be true or just because you want to smear someone.
 +
 +
:I am not a Bill Browder fan, but we shouldn't just make things up.  What are we going to put next in the article that Browder is a pedophile or axe murderer - even if we have no proof of these things?
 +
 +
:Conservapedia bills itself as "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia". Let's try to live up to that. Truth matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:03, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
Andy, please put a stop to this. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_Browder&diff=1979802&oldid=1979800] it is 7 1/2 hours now of trolling. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:29, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
What is the issue here? That Bill Browder is not a red diaper baby and Vladimir Putin is not a Christian, determined to keep Russia Christian?
 +
 +
Because this doesn't fit with vendetta, not against Putin or Russia, but against me personally. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:34, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:RobSmith, you can stop engaging in the manipulative tactic of playing the victim. I have called Andy. I also let him know via email about your latest fiasco of you claiming a source said something when the source claimed the exact opposite of what you claimed. This is the second time I have caught you doing this. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:42, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Did you get my email? The problem is, you sound like [[Kamala Harris]] when you speak on Russia, Ukraine, or Putin. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:01, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::RobSmith, please provide a single source that Bill Browder is a communist. Your own source says that he is a capitalist. You haven't even provided a blog post or social media as a source for your contention that he is communist. Zero. Nada. Show some self-respect please. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:29, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::Where does it say he's a communist? You are trolling again. I fixed your inquiry hours ago. Andy, please put a stop to this. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:33, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::::There is not a single [https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservative edit here since 15:39] that is not a trolling edit. it is now 23:30. That is almost 8 full hours. {{Personal remark removed}} [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:40, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
{{Hide collapse
 +
|reason=Off topic trolling and personal attacks
 +
|content=RobSmith, emotional problems? Who is the self-admitted screamer on telephone calls?
 +
 +
LT said of your screaming: "Also, as for that user in question, Conservative noted that he yelled on phone calls. I can confirm this because I was once on a phone call overhearing that said individual screeching agitprop that was repetitive to the point of being pathetically boring. —LT Rev. 22:13 Sunday, 18:02, September 3, 2023 (EDT)"
 +
 +
Please get a grip. People are tiring of your drama queen antics, your malevolence and your penchant to mislead/lie. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:03, September 9, 2023 (EDT)}}
 +
 +
'''The most recent update: This is another example of this editor trying to make a source claim something it doesn't say:'''
 +
 +
User: RobSmith your revision now says:
 +
 +
:"Continuing a family tradition, Bill Browder is the red diaper baby nemesis of [[Vladimir Putin]].<ref>[https://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/28/opinions/bill-browder-opinion-weiss/index.html Bill Browder, from red diaper baby to Putin’s nemesis], By Michael Weiss, CNN, July 28, 2017</ref> Modern Russia is determined that the [[atheist]]ic communist [[ideology]] will never dominate Russia again.<ref>[https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/07/28/putin-christianity-foundation-russian-nationhood-cultural-identity/ Putin: Christianity is the foundation of the Russian state], by [[Associated Press]], July 28, 2018.</ref>"
 +
 +
User: RobSmtith, your own source says: "But by odd coincidence, Earl Browder’s grandson Bill, a Red diaper baby turned '''capitalist'''"."[https://edition.cnn.com/2017/07/28/opinions/bill-browder-opinion-weiss/index.html]  (bolding added for emphasis).
 +
 +
Notice that your own source indicates that Bill Browder is capitalist - not a communist. This is another example of you trying to make a source claim something it doesn't say
 +
 +
User: RobSmith, find a reputable conservative or right-wing source saying Bill Browder is communist if you wish to make this claim in the article. So far you haven't provided '''any source''' indicating that Bill Browder is a communist. 
 +
 +
This is not a reasonable approach. You are intentionally misleading the reader. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:44, September 8, 2023 (EDT)
 +
====References====
 +
{{reflist}}
 +
 +
==Note==
 +
Everytime User:Conservative goes on one of his all-day trolling rampages, our active users become inactive. They probably don't want to get caught up in it (except User:LT, who enjoys fanny the flames). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:32, September 9, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Re: Someone attempting to bully me on my talk page. I very politely told this person that I prefer not to communicate with them anymore.  ==
 +
[[File:Wambulance.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Waaa! Boo Hoo! Only I get to troll Andy's talk page! Waaa!]]
 +
[[User: RobSmith]] is attempting to bully me on my talk page.
 +
 +
As you know, as per the Conservapedia page [[Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia]], "We respect users' control over their own talk pages as much as possible. Wikipedia treats users' own talk pages like government or public property, and it becomes a place for Wikipedia editors to bully users."
 +
 +
I very politely told User: RobSmith that I prefer not to communicate with him anymore. He is not respecting my cordial request.
 +
 +
If you could put an end to this unfortunate situation, I would appreciate it. This attempted bullying is not only against Conservapedia's rules, it is also un-American. The U.S. Constitution does allow for freedom of association.
 +
 +
Please request that User: RobSmith respect my user talk page and respect my [[User:Conservative/mail]] as well.
 +
 +
I am sending you a copy of this request to your email and sending an email copy to User: RobSmith as well. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:21, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
===Someone attempting to bully me on my talk page. I very politely answered his questions===
 +
:I very politely told this person to stop pesterfestering the other day. He continued trolling with reams and reams of hypertext. I've already Archived at least[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3ARobSmith&diff=1979963&oldid=1978964 3,800 bytes of his trolling on my talk page] that I do not have the time to read '''''even''''' after we supposedly reached a "detente" after a two-hour phone conversation. Now, when I finally answer one of his trolling complaints (which he posted at least 3 times on various pages), he complains to you, Andy. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:36, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
::Andy, what User: RobSmith claims is not true. You can see for yourself by examining the log record for this morning at https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative/mail&action=history [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:43, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::Caught in a lie again. Here is the link from this morning: https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservative&oldid=1980204
 +
::::He has two different talk pages.
 +
::::The stuff with the Ezekiel passage he spammed on three different pages Friday. Now he whines cause I finally got around to answering him. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:42, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
:::Hey, it's already posted above from 2 days ago. You are trolling and bullying right now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:46, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Andy, this is insane. That he interprets ''How CP differs from WP'' as meaning he can troll people on article talk pages, their user talk pages, in Essays and Debates, with redundant spam postings over and over and over again, for hours on end, and his talk page is sacrosanct that no one can ask, "What are you doing?" [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:51, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
::If we did reach "detente" as he proclaimed to the world at 2 AM (MDT), it was only cause [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:RobSmith/Archive_14#We_appear_to_have_solved_our_Bill_Browder_dispute._I_am_glad_this_occurred. I was worn down by his bullying after a trollfest] that began 8 AM MDT. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:57, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
===Liberal democracy===
 +
[[File:9-10-23.PNG|right]]
 +
 +
He is now defending [[liberal democracy]] for one purpose and one purpose only, to troll me. In late July he was trash talking it; he spent the entire month of August (more than 90 hours in one 6-day stretch) trolling me with this garbage. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 17:05, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
He has no personal interest or understanding of the subject. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 17:06, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:So he sinks off to one of his Essays to pout some more with another 1,001 bytes. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_Cut_toxic_people_out_of_your_life_and_replace_them_with_edifying_achievers_who_inspire_you&curid=178662&diff=1980234&oldid=1980054] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:20, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
::This whole Essay, [[Essay: Cut toxic people out of your life and replace them with edifying achievers who inspire you]], if you read it, is apparently very [[narcissistic]], which, according to him, is one symptom of [[Dark Triad personality traits]]. Essay space should be used to share ideas with everyone on a conservative wiki, not a place to pout and plot vengeance against people one imagines are "bullying" you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:27, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
::And it should be fairly obvious he regards me as a "toxic person" he wants to "cut out of his life" with all the bullying and harassment threads he's created on Andy's talk page directed at me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:33, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:All the ''How CP differs from WP'' control over user talk page means is, you can revert other's postings at will. It does not mean you can wall yourself off from society cause you are too good to engage with other human beings. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 18:41, September 10, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
== The editor who said he doesn't have a good grasp as far as the social science of psychology is messing around with psychology articles out of spite and trying to inject mere opinion ==
 +
 +
Andy, you told RobSmith that the [[Dark Triad personality traits]] article appears to be a good article. Three Conservapedia editors agreed with you related to RobSmith's attempt to delete the article.
 +
 +
RobSmith, the editor who said he doesn't have a good grasp as far as the social science of psychology, is messing around with my psychology articles out of spite. And he is trying to inject his mere opinions as facts. That is against Conservapedia Commandment #1 which is "Everything must be verifiable and true". [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:25, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Oh, Conservapedia's a [[mobocracy]] now, huh? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:50, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
:Since RobSmith is being very disruptive, I suggest a few possible solutions if he chooses to persist: '''1)''' Insist that he source every statement so he doesn't inject his mere opinions '''2)''' Give him a topical ban on editing psychology articles. '''3)''' Strip him of his Admin rights again. As you know, he was stripped of his Admin rights previously.
 +
 +
:Conservapedia needs to have standards in terms of behavior and in terms of not injecting mere opinion into articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:30, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
::P.S. As you know, despite Karajou's adamant insistence that RobSmith be banned from Conservapedia, I stood up for RobSmith.  On the other hand, nobody is above the law/rules when it comes the Conservapedia Commandments and our rules of decorum.  If RobSmith persists in this behavior, then some disciplinary measure needs to be taken. Power corrupts is a principle that conservatives agree on. And RobSmith cannot be allowed to be a tyrant. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:46, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:[[Machiavellianism (psychology)]] is [[psychobabble]]. User:Conservative has persistently used that [[ad hominem ]] attack against me on this page. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:50, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Andy, he's trolling me and my user page right now, after having flatly refused to discuss problem articles on article pages. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 21:52, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
::You're not in a position to say what is psychobabble and what is not. You have said you don't have a good grasp when it comes to pyschology.
 +
 +
::But I have criticized [[Niccolò Machiavelli]] and your love of him. But Machiavelli is a person and not a psychological theory/malady such as [[Machiavellianism (psychology)]]. Don't confuse psychology with historical people. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:54, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::I did try to have discussions on talk pages. And then I brought it on your talk page to let you know about the article talk page post. But you were insisting on engaging in revert wars. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:01, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
::::By the way, the last time I pushed hard for you to be disciplined, I was successful. I prefer not to push hard again and for you to behave more reasonably and cordially. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:03, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Over <s>2,000</s> 3,800 trolling edit bytes on my user page in the past 3 hours. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&curid=164865&action=history]
 +
----
 +
:*User:Conservative took over the [[Machiavellianism]] page on July 26, and converted its meaning from its historical socio-political context (as referenced numerous times in Andy's World History series) into [[psychobabble]], not defined by the DSM V. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Machiavellianism_(psychology)&oldid=1975461#Machiavellianism_and_the_dark_triad_of_personality_traits]
 +
 +
:*User:Conservative since August 2 has accused me, User:RobSmith, of "Machiavellianism" in [[ad hominem]] attacks 24 times on Aschlafly/talk page. [https://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:User_complaints/Archive/Archive5] Pardon me, but I only see maliciousness in these attacks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:21, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
----
 +
::There is a difference between the political worldview and general worldview of Niccolò Machiavelli and the psychological issue of [[Machiavellianism (psychology)]].
 +
 +
::I am giving you credit in understanding the issue. Don't intentionally conflate the issue. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:38, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Bottomline: [[Machiavellianism (psychology)]] is [[psychobabble]]. There's no way around that. And if one does a [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=500&offset=0&ns0=1&ns1=1&ns2=1&ns3=1&ns4=1&ns5=1&ns6=1&ns7=1&ns8=1&ns9=1&ns10=1&ns11=1&ns12=1&ns13=1&ns14=1&ns15=1&ns120=1&ns121=1&ns122=1&ns123=1&ns124=1&ns125=1&ns126=1&ns127=1&search=Machiavellian search of the term in Conservapedia], you've used it for years to attack your enemies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:48, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
== My psychology article editing: My interest in psychology,  the psychology articles and abnormal psychology/pathology ==
 +
 +
I know we talked on the telephone about my psychology articles, but I didn't tell you something important. So I am doing that now.
 +
 +
One of the reasons I created articles and expanded articles as far as the Conservapedia psychology articles is due to my professional life.
 +
 +
I work as a Producer/booker for a leading podcast (top 1/2 percent of all podcasts in listenership). And one of the areas we cover is the true crime genre. I find criminology and psychological pathology interesting. And I enjoy listening to the podcasts of the people I book in the true crime area - especially the authors who went into the cells of prisoners to interview them or did detailed analyses of these criminals.
 +
 +
In addition, I work in some fields where one has to very much understand human behavior in order to be successful.
 +
 +
So I lot of my editing in these areas was related to my personal interest and study/knowledge of these areas. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:34, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:If one looks at your [[Subclinical (psychology)]] article, in the first three words it becomes apparent you don't distinguish between psychology and psychiatry.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:39, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::Wrong. You don't understand the difference. I explained it on the talk page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:42, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
::P.S. One of the things that makes wikis successful is people editing things that they have an interest in and have gained knowledge in. A self-admitted unknowledgeable person about a topic who lacks cordiality should not be allowed to run amok. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:41, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::The opening line here: "According to the psychiatric journal BMC Psychiatry: "Subthreshold psychiatric symptoms"..." shows you have no understanding of Subclinical (psychology). And talking to you, you apparently have no interest in understanding Subclinical (psychology). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 22:53, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
Psychiatry is a discipline of [[medical science]] that uses medicine (Like drugs) and the social science of psychology. That is why the "Subclinical (psychiatry)" belongs under "Subclinical (psychology)". All psychiatrists are medical doctors (MDs). It is the psychology that defines the term. The drug part is not involved.
 +
 +
I covered the material on abnormal psychology that I thought was interesting. So I don't expect to create any more content in this area. Any new content related to psychology will be related to cognitive psychology (learning) or psychology related to motivation, self-control, conscientiousness. In other words, psychology related to human performance. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:34, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:LOL, I'll hold you to that. Btw, I just noticed [https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Dark_Triad_personality,_toxic_personality_or_demon_possessed%3F this new piece.] You snuck that one in under my nose today without me noticing until now.
 +
 +
:When we complete life's journey, and you and your fans and critics look back upon your [[ouvré]] and wonder about the genius of your inspiration, I hope they find something nearing the [[truth]] and the meaning of being human, and not just another [[Aleister Crowley]] wannabee. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:48, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
::Actually, you are the one who accused me of having a demon - despite you having little to no knowledge about exorcisms or demonology. I cite you claiming about me: "He's demonic. Even the demons believe in God, tremble, as the bible says.  [[User:RobSmith|'''nobs''']]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|'''''Viva la Revolución!''''']]</sup> 20:26, 25 July 2011 (UTC)"[https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F&diff=prev&oldid=838017]
 +
 +
::At least I cited a clergy/theologian with actual exorcism experience when it comes to exorcism. And I certainly did not accuse someone of having a demon who I hardly know - like you did. This is another example of you claiming something is a fact without adequate evidence. Just because you wish something to be true or wish to smear someone, doesn't give you a license to pretend something is true. Armchair theology/demonology is rather juvenile. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:57, September 11, 2023 (EDT)
 +
:::We are commanded to judge the spirits (1 John 4:1). Discerning of spirits is a gift of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:10). Faith without works is dead. (James 2:24) My exercising my gift of the Holy Spirit is my works (1 Corinthians 12:7).
 +
 +
:::''You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe—and shudder!'' (James 2:19)
 +
 +
:::Anti-atheism is not the same as preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Even a Satanist can be anti-atheist. You and I, User:Conservative, discussed this on the phone many, many years ago. I was left with the impression then you were not listening (you seemingly were too obsessed with pursuing a personal vendetta). There is nothing malevolent in what I said, and what I was quoted as saying. The spiritual discernment the Lord has entrusted to me is borne out by the scripture. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 09:30, September 12, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
:::Wow. Nuff said. I'll pray for you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 00:23, September 12, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
I see that RobSmith and Conservative are endlessly bickering over some articles concerning psychology topics. From what I notice, Conservative's work appears to be mostly researched well. While I differ with his writing style, it appears that his content is quite informative and educational. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Wednesday, 23:05, September 12, 2023 (EDT)
 +
:You're a day late and dollar short, my friend. We've moved on to [[demonology]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 23:10, September 12, 2023 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Game Over==
 +
[[File:Wager.PNG|1200px]]
 +
<br />
 +
<center><big>'''[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_proven_right&diff=1981947&oldid=1979702 Conservapedia proven right]'''</big></center>
 +
<br />
 +
<center><b align="center" style="width: 70%; background:#000;color:#eee;border: 4px gold solid; font-size: 20px;"><big>GAME OVER</big></b><br><br><br></center>
 +
 +
Andy, Please ask [[User:Conservative]] to cease his relenmtless [[trolling]] of me now.
 +
 +
*[[Essay: The SPECIFIC MONTH OF APRIL 2022 was not a pivotal point in geopolitics that will affect geopolitics for 30 years]]
 +
 +
Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 14:24, September 14, 2023 (EDT)
 +
----
 +
{{Hide collapse
 +
|reason=Off topic. Game Over means Game Over.
 +
|content=:You got a fair point. We are indeed at the final stages of the end times, and the culminating [https://www.newsweek.com/russia-putin-moscow-west-economics-world-order-1726686 Putinist] [https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/xi-putin-pledge-new-world-order-chinese-leader-leaves-russia-rcna76048 New] [https://www.washingtonpost.com/podcasts/post-reports/putin-and-xi-want-a-new-world-order/ World] [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2022/mar/25/the-putin-and-xi-new-world-order/ Order] will pave the way for the Antichrist. Let's connect the dots together: why is [https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/pope-francis-praise-russian-empire-ukraine-putin-rcna102283 Pope] [https://www.politico.eu/article/pope-francis-nato-cause-ukraine-invasion-russia/ Francis] [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pope-francis-russia-ukraine-war-russian-imperial-heritage-youth-remarks/ supporting] [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-06-14/pope-repeats-view-nato-positioning-was-factor-in-russia-war-move#xj4y7vzkg Russia]? Because the son of perdition's power will be an outgrowth of anti-globalist sentiment that paves the way for the syncretic, populist coalition of illiberal agitators who will soon take control of governments.
 +
{{cquote|And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.|||Rev. 17:11–12}}
 +
:The Vatican realignment is concurrent with the rising tide of the antithesis which will soon take control amidst the falling away. (2 Thess. 2:3) As the apostate Protestant ideology known as "[[Christian Nationalism]]" gains traction and eventually seizes control of governmental civil power, demands will be rapidly promulgated for Sunday rest—presented to the Catholics and apostate Protestants of the right as "restoring Christian morality" and to the left as reducing consumption to fight climate change.
 +
{{cquote|And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.|||Rev. 13:15–18}}
 +
:—[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Thursday, 15:42, September 14, 2023 (EDT)}}
RobSmith
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,324

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1982377"

Navigation menu