Changes

::::Rat-Wiki is stupid, period. They can't tell trolls apart from each other (they think I am Grawp... lol), and sometimes can't tell good faith editors from bad faith editors. Plus it's widely known that people have multiple accounts there, which raises an interesting question as to whether those people are voting for board members more than once. But while we're on the topic of that sewer, why do we have an article on GrammarCommie? He is a loser. Conservapedia is an encyclopedia. Encyclopedias don't cover random losers. We are not Rat-Wiki. RE: Trent Toulouse's weight, I'm pretty sure his weight has nothing to do with his idiocy, but he's not even very active there anymore unless he has a sock, as Rob has proposed. Seriously though, why do we even talk about those losers on here? We used to have a policy against that. We need to return to those days. I only brought them up (referring to them as a rat nest because that's what they are) because of Rob trying to imitate them, which is retarded. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 07:32, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

::::Rat-Wiki is stupid, period. They can't tell trolls apart from each other (they think I am Grawp... lol), and sometimes can't tell good faith editors from bad faith editors. Plus it's widely known that people have multiple accounts there, which raises an interesting question as to whether those people are voting for board members more than once. But while we're on the topic of that sewer, why do we have an article on GrammarCommie? He is a loser. Conservapedia is an encyclopedia. Encyclopedias don't cover random losers. We are not Rat-Wiki. RE: Trent Toulouse's weight, I'm pretty sure his weight has nothing to do with his idiocy, but he's not even very active there anymore unless he has a sock, as Rob has proposed. Seriously though, why do we even talk about those losers on here? We used to have a policy against that. We need to return to those days. I only brought them up (referring to them as a rat nest because that's what they are) because of Rob trying to imitate them, which is retarded. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 07:32, September 16, 2023 (EDT)

:::::I think Trent possibly operates with a network of socks. In my time there as the "history expert," initially it was Flandres that suddenly became active in constantly engaging with me. Then it became Plutocow, who relatively quickly became an administrator after account creation and was a site "expert" and someone to stifle my activities. In later months, Flandres always reappeared after hiatuses at suspiciously convenient moments, constantly to take swipes at me, and especially during votes. When ATIM cases were brought against me, it was often the same gang that piled against me so consistently and vociferously: Bongolian, Spud, Flandres, and Plutocow. If they're not all socks of Trent Toulouse, the people running them must belong to the "Trentist" pseudo-school of thought and are directly trained by him. The events definitely did not appear coincidental.

:::::I think Trent possibly operates with a network of socks. In my time there as the "history expert," initially it was Flandres that suddenly became active in constantly engaging with me. Then it became Plutocow, who relatively quickly became an administrator after account creation and was a site "expert" and someone to stifle my activities. In later months, Flandres always reappeared after hiatuses at suspiciously convenient moments, constantly to take swipes at me, and especially during votes. When ATIM cases were brought against me, it was often the same gang that piled against me so consistently and vociferously: Bongolian, Spud, Flandres, and Plutocow. If they're not all socks of Trent Toulouse, the people running them must belong to the "Trentist" pseudo-school of thought and are directly trained by him. The events definitely did not appear coincidental.

:::::There were also parallels between the suspected RW Trent socks and suspected Conservapedia Trent socks: both Flandres on RationalWiki and [[Special:Contributions/Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] on CP brought up [[Howard W. Smith]]; the CP article was created by Mr. Nationalist, and Flandres in a debate on conservative Democrats brought up Smith in an eerily similar manner. And yet another key example: on Conservapedia some time ago, I created a userbox saying I'm not a populist, and Mr. Nationalist subsequently created a userbox stating the opposite, but copying my entire template formatting. Likewise, in my last essay on RationalWiki as the "history expert," Plutocow in the talk page lazily mocked me on the talk by copy/pasting the writing style of my reply. IOWs, a "Trentist" characteristic would be lazily mocking an opponent by straight-up copy/pasting the substance of their insertions while stating the opposite opinion. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|^{Rev. 22:13}]]''''' Sunday, 01:27, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

:::::There were also parallels between the suspected RW Trent socks and suspected Conservapedia Trent socks: both Flandres on RationalWiki and [[Special:Contributions/Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] on CP brought up [[Howard W. Smith]]; the CP article was created by Mr. Nationalist, and Flandres in a debate on conservative Democrats brought up Smith in an eerily similar manner. And yet another key example: on Conservapedia some time ago, I created a userbox saying I'm not a populist, and Mr. Nationalist subsequently created a userbox stating the opposite, but copying my entire template formatting. Likewise, in my last essay on RationalWiki as the "history expert," Plutocow in the talk page lazily mocked me on the talk by copy/pasting the writing style of my reply. IOWs, a "Trentist" characteristic would be lazily mocking an opponent by straight-up copy/pasting the substance of their insertions while stating the opposite opinion.

:::::And on a complete side note, regarding that latter "Trentist" characteristic I detailed, RobSmith does that exact same thing, sometimes while ''accusing me of adopting RationalWiki characteristics.'' If that doesn't constitute irony, I don't know what does. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|^{Rev. 22:13}]]''''' Sunday, 01:27, September 17, 2023 (EDT)

:Hillary Clinton is a loser. The loser Adolf Hitler caused Germany to get into a pointless war and then he killed himself. Joe Biden is a loser with a low presidential approval rating.  We have lots of articles on losers. Unfortunately, the world has a lot of losers and a fairly high percentage of losers. And these losers adversely affect the world.  

:Hillary Clinton is a loser. The loser Adolf Hitler caused Germany to get into a pointless war and then he killed himself. Joe Biden is a loser with a low presidential approval rating.  We have lots of articles on losers. Unfortunately, the world has a lot of losers and a fairly high percentage of losers. And these losers adversely affect the world.