Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
417 bytes added ,  00:56, September 18, 2023
→‎Text: There was a seven-year time limit in the resolving clause, not the amendment itself, which Congress enacted. As this scholarly analysis demonstrates, the resolving clause of a constitutional amendment is fully effective, and thus the seven
Line 27: Line 27:     
In 2019, a congresswoman introduced a revised ERA which mentions "women" in one of its clauses.
 
In 2019, a congresswoman introduced a revised ERA which mentions "women" in one of its clauses.
 +
 +
=== Time limit in the resolving clause ==
 +
 +
There was a seven-year time limit in the resolving clause, not the amendment itself, which [[Congress]] enacted.  As this scholarly analysis demonstrates, the resolving clause of a constitutional amendment is fully effective, and thus the seven-year time limit on the ratification of ERA is enforceable.<ref>https://reason.com/volokh/2023/09/13/new-light-on-the-era/</ref>
    
==Impact on abortion and other issues==
 
==Impact on abortion and other issues==
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu