Changes

'''Ordering the Gospels''' is an issue worth revisiting, because the current order is based on at least two historical misunderstandings:<ref>https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/scripture/04-7_190.pdf</ref>

'''Ordering the Gospels''' is an issue worth revisiting, because the current order is based on at least two historical misunderstandings:<ref>https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/scripture/04-7_190.pdf</ref>

*that the [[Gospel of Mark]] relied on the [[Gospel of Matthew]], when modern analysis shows the opposite to have been true;

*that the [[Gospel of Mark]] relied on the [[Gospel of Matthew]], when basic analysis shows the opposite to have been true;

*that the [[Gospel of Matthew]] was originally written in [[Hebrew]] or [[Aramaic]], which modern scholars, often prone to [[liberal bias]] in contradicting the apostolic record of the ante-Nicene Fathers, reject while observing that its terminology is uniquely [[Greek]] (such as his use of "hypocrite"<ref>(See, e.g., Matt. 23:13-30; 6:2, 5, 16 [https://www.lagrangenews.com/2016/02/13/church-columnist-building-a-biblical-vocabulary-hypocrite/#:~:text=So%20the%20Greek%20word%20hupokrites,%2C%2016%3B%20et%20al Biblical vocabulary]).</ref>)

*that the [[Gospel of Matthew]] was originally written in [[Hebrew]] or [[Aramaic]], which modern scholars, often prone to [[liberal bias]] in contradicting the apostolic record of the ante-Nicene Fathers, reject while observing that its terminology is uniquely [[Greek]] (such as his use of "hypocrite"<ref>(See, e.g., Matt. 23:13-30; 6:2, 5, 16 [https://www.lagrangenews.com/2016/02/13/church-columnist-building-a-biblical-vocabulary-hypocrite/#:~:text=So%20the%20Greek%20word%20hupokrites,%2C%2016%3B%20et%20al Biblical vocabulary]).</ref>)