Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,820
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,235:
Line 1,235: − == A request == − This is [[User: Conservative]]. Andy is going to contact [[User: RobSmith]] about the following matter this week and hopefully RobSmith decides to change his behavior. But if he doesn't, please contact [[User: Aschlafly]] about this matter should RobSmith persists. + − Below is a post I recently made to [[User: Aschlafly]]. + − === The attacks by a Conservapedia Admin on a current Admin needs to stop completely and if he persists there need to be consequences ===+ + + − One thing I want to add about the current situation of [[User: RobSmith]] currently attacking [[User: Conservative]]. + − RobSmith has been relentlessly attacking me via talk pages (and other pages of Conservapedia) and provoking me to respond to him. While this morning I made the decision to totally ignore him henceforth, this is unwarranted. I have brought a lot of traffic and publicity to Conservapedia. And currently, I do work for conservative organizations and assist a leading podcast in a beneficial way by inviting some conservatives. I realize that RobSmith may have all the time in the world to waste vindictively attacking me, but this is very foolish and it needs to stop. + − + + − The problem with gossip is that it not only disgraces the tall tale bearer, but it also brings shame to Conservapedia. Recently, a fellow Conservapedian said that fellow conservatives seeing RobSmith's shameful behavior harms Conservapedia's reputation among fellow conservatives. + + − And the icing on the cake is that User: RobSmith set up [[Conservapedia:Team CP]] to supposedly help promote cordiality at Conservapedia. Unsurprisingly, only one Conservapedian joined. And ironically, the one Conservapedian who did join, recently criticized User: RobSmith for his incivility. I believe that RobSmith set up Team CP to make himself look good and to serve as a distraction from his obviously uncivil behavior. Well, it's not working as 5 Conservapedians have commented to me about User: RobSmith's bad behavior. + − And if this wasn't bad enough, recently the Admin RobSmith vindictively vandalized the popular article [[Internet atheism]] which has over 87,000 page views created by User: Conservative and removed over 50,000 bytes of content from the article. An Admin is supposed to stop vandalism at Conservapedia - not create it!+ − Here is my update to my bio on Conservapedia's page on Conservapedia just to make things perfectly clear:+ − The [[User:Conservative]] account has contributed the majority of content to the extremely popular [[Atheism]], [[evolution]], and [[homosexuality]] articles. User: Conservative's work has been cited/quoted/referred to by the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', ''[[USA Today]]'', ''The [[Chicago Tribune]]'', ''[[The Telegraph]]'', ''The Tampa Tribune'', [[Concerned Women for America]], [[CRU]], [[WorldNetDaily]], [[Shockofgod]], [[Penn Jillette]], [[PZ Myers]], [[Secular Talk|Kyle Kulinski]], Lewis Black, and a leading French news outlet. The [[PNN News and Ministry Network]] produced a video entitled [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3paAT8AO2Gk Viral article deals major blow to atheism]. The book ''Atheist Persona: Causes and Consequences'' by John J. Pasquini, Th.D, cites Conservapedia's [[Causes of atheism]] article several times. [https://books.google.com/books/about/Atheist_Persona.html?id=TaTsnQEACAAJ] Currently, User: Conservative is a Producer for a politics/social commentary/investigative reporting podcast that is among the top 1/2 percent of podcast in popularity and he has obtained interviews from best-selling authors, academics, filmmakers, political activists and religious figures. He also provides and/or has provided digital marketing services for a company, some leading nonprofits and a church in addition to being a writer who writes content for popular articles on the internet. + − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→Great to see you again, Ed!
== Great to see you! ==
== Great to see you! ==
Great to see you, Ed! Hope all is well. It's fantastic to see a longtime friend again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:42, September 20, 2022 (EDT)
Great to see you, Ed! Hope all is well. It's fantastic to see a longtime friend again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:42, September 20, 2022 (EDT)
== Hi dear Ed ==
God bless you Ed Poor.
RobS is actually againt this LT behavior.
It's LT who blames Jews for Hitler, not RobS.
This is about LT, he just pasted it all from his talk page on to here.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:38, October 2, 2024 (EDT)
== Nice quotes on leadership on your user page ==
I liked the quotes on leadership that are on your user page. I copied them to this page: [[User:Conservative/Quotes]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:56, October 2, 2024 (EDT)
I updated my bio for Conservapedia and it reflects the work I currently do. And none of it involves the slanderous and false gossip that RobSmith is trying to push such as me allegedly being a bisexual, being a partner in 3-way love affair, attending a church whose pastor is married to a drag queen or being an unethical salesman (I don't even currently work in sales).
== Hooray!!!! ==
You made my day, Ed!!! So good to see you again. I have the good memory of attending a certain college speech with you and others perhaps a decade ago. So glad you're still active!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:57, October 15, 2024 (EDT)
==Larry Sanger==
I note you have good things to say about [[Larry Sanger]] who has professed his belief in [[Christianity]] in recent years.
[[User:Conservative]] made the assertion that Larry Sanger was an [[atheist]] (totally untrue) and either [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&diff=2070366&oldid=1976745 condoned or was a practitioner of bestiality] which was repeated in [https://therightscoop.com/why-should-a-conservative-bother-using-wikipedia/ conservative media]. After Sanger's conversion from [[agnosticism]] to Christianity I cleaned up the Wikipedia page and at least a half dozen other pages User:Conservative copy pasted his [[spam]] into. But he steadfastly refuses to clean up at least 342 other pages with his assertions, nor change his editing habits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 02:21, November 16, 2024 (EST)
* Two decades ago, Larry said he was an atheist, but I never held that against him, particularly because I was at the time an active member in the most unpopular new religion in America. Both he and Jimbo Wales supported me as a preeminent expositor of "neutrality". If there is anything that needs to be cleaned up, post it here or email me at uncle_ed_poor@yahoo.com. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:29, November 23, 2024 (EST)
== Woman pilot accused of being a DEI hire ==
Re: Woman helicopter pilot accused of being a DEI hire.
I trust this information helps clarify matters. And by the way, Andy knows these things are true just in case the gossiper RobSmith should wish to contend my bio. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:17, September 24, 2023 (EDT)
"According to research and data, there is no significant difference in piloting ability between women and men, meaning women pilots can be just as good as male pilots when considering skill and competence; studies have shown that when factors like experience are controlled for, accident rates between genders are largely comparable."[https://www.google.com/search?q=are+women+pilots+as+good+as+men&oq=are+woman+pilots+as+goo&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCAgBEAAYFhgeMgYIABBFGDkyCAgBEAAYFhgeMggIAhAAGBYYHjIICAMQABgWGB4yCAgEEAAYFhgeMg0IBRAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBhAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBxAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMgcICBAAGO8FMgYICRAuGEDSAQkxNDY5NGowajGoAgCwAgA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8]
But there is a long tradition of blaming women for calamity and incompetence.
Examples:
1. "Women driver"
2. Adam blamed Eve.
P.S. I am waiting for FAA to give their ruling and I am not pre-judging matters. I haven't been following this news story closely.
I hope this clarifies matters. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:53, February 1, 2025 (EST)
:I don't think the executive branch criticism was for her being a woman - but for being inexperienced, and pushed into a job to fill a DEI quota. I'll try to follow up on that. Anyway, the DEI controversy is a major part of the story. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:58, February 1, 2025 (EST)
::::I just saw a news report at: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmpkoJhqUP8 FAA Academy struggled to fill classes over DEI quotas: Sen. Mullin]. The claim is that at the time of one of the recent crashes, the air traffic control tower was understaffed. This news report indicated that when you have DEI what happens sometimes is that a significant portion of jobs become not filled because they are looking for a DEI hire with the requisite skills to do the job when there are non DEI applicants who could do the job and are not hired. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:11, February 1, 2025 (EST)
:Yes, I think that is the Trump Administration argument. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:41, February 1, 2025 (EST)
::Speaking of focusing on DEI over competency: <blockquote>The DNC Leader interrupted the party election to tell members that not enough non-binary candidates have been elected, so they MUST now vote for one.</blockquote>
[https://x.com/behizytweets/status/1885836927112552800 per this][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:46, February 1, 2025 (EST)
:::From what I have heard so far, the planes usually come down a certain runway which I will call Runway A. But the plane that was in the crash was coming down Runway B. From what I understand, the pilot accidentally left out the information that the plane was coming down Runway B. On top of this, light pollution caused the helicopter pilot to probably not see the plane. And from what I understand, the air traffic tower was understaffed and that may have contributed to the air traffic controller mistake. On top of this, Trump is claiming that the helicopter was flying at an inappropriate altitude.
:::But like I said, I am not pre-judging things. I will reserve judgement until the FAA makes its ruling. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:51, February 1, 2025 (EST)
::::Telling, you might find this interesting: [[Prevalence of homosexuality going down in cultures that become more conservative]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:54, February 1, 2025 (EST)
* Guys, Remember this dreadful non answer by KBJ in Mar 2022?[https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2022/3/video-release-judge-jackson-cannot-define-woman-during-blackburn-scotus-day-two-hearing-remarks] [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])•
At Reagan National, ATC routinely asks pilots if they can land on the shorter runway (change from runway 1 to runway 33). Helicopter pilots SHOULD know this. If not, why not? Especially if they are TRAINING for a crucially important emergency flight.
Also, they know (if they are bright enough to pound sand) that they will be crossing the flight path of landing airplanes. Wouldn't it make sense to be darn sure they aren't going to collide with any of them? (Not just the one that ATC "mentions"?) The best way to avoid a collision with another aircraft is to be NOT at the same altitude. Helicopters can fly safely between 50 and 200 feet off the ground, even at night.
100% pilot error, Captain Rebecca Lobach, out of [[Davison Army Airfield]] in [[Fairfax County, Virginia]]. My condolences to your family. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 21:53, February 1, 2025 (EST)
== Great to see you again, Ed! ==
Ed, great to see you again, and thanks for your terrific edits!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:30, July 9, 2026 (EDT)
:Sometimes it takes 5 or 10 minutes to get a page to load - I don't know if it's my wifi or what. That's the main reason I've been away so much. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:55, July 9, 2026 (EDT)
::People are dying and [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#User:Conservative.27s_obsession_with_homosexuality User:Conservative with his homosexual obsession thinks it's a big joke.]
::Ed: Should [[Conservapedia]] & Andy consider the following information as a vital [[foreign policy]] question in considering [[peace]] or [[war]], [[escalation]], and [[Ukraine aid]]?
===Using abductive reasoning, guestimate which Moscow, Russia drag queens are the most popular and list them by popularity===
The most concise takeaway: Based on available reporting, the three most visible Moscow‑connected drag artists are Zaza Napoli, Lorina Rey, and Gena Marvin, with Zaza Napoli being the closest thing to a mainstream celebrity, Lorina Rey being the most prominent underground Moscow performer, and Gena Marvin being the most internationally recognized activist‑queen.
Below is a structured abductive “best‑guess” ranking grounded in the search results.
=== '''🏆 Abductive popularity ranking (Moscow‑connected drag queens)''' ===
This ranking uses abductive reasoning: inferring “most likely popularity” from visibility, media coverage, cultural influence, and public reach.
=== '''1. Zaza Napoli — Mainstream celebrity status''' ===
A long‑established Moscow nightlife figure with TV credits, music releases, and high‑profile event hosting.
Referred to as the “Queen of Russian Drag” in community events.
Performs internationally and maintains a broad entertainment presence beyond queer venues.
This level of mainstream crossover strongly suggests the highest popularity among Moscow‑associated drag performers.
=== '''2. Lorina Rey — Most visible underground Moscow drag artist''' ===
A pioneering Moscow‑based queen highlighted in international fashion media (Dazed).
Known for avant‑garde, boundary‑pushing drag and a strong online presence.
Frequently cited as one of the most visible and outspoken figures in modern Russian drag.
Her prominence in Moscow’s queer scene suggests she is the most popular within the underground/club culture.
=== '''3. Gena Marvin — Internationally recognized activist‑queen''' ===
A genderqueer drag performer whose radical public protests in Russia gained global media attention.
Has over 137k Instagram followers, indicating significant public reach.
Although now in exile (Paris), her fame originates from Moscow‑centered activism and performances.
High international visibility places her third in Moscow‑connected popularity.
=== '''Why these three dominate the abductive ranking''' ===
'''Media visibility:''' All three appear in major outlets (Dazed, PinkNews, Moscow Times).
'''Cultural impact:''' Each has shaped Russian drag in a distinct way—mainstream entertainment, underground artistry, political activism.
'''Public reach:''' Zaza Napoli’s TV presence, Lorina Rey’s fashion‑media coverage, and Gena Marvin’s large social following provide measurable indicators.
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:24, July 10, 2026 (EDT)
:LOL, drag queens just want publicity - best strategy is to ignore them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:23, July 12, 2026 (EDT)
::Oh no, it's a serious question. You might want to chime in at '''[[Debate: Would Jesus support Ukraine aid because Russia has two gay bathhouses?]]'''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|Do straight normies spend 20 yrs obsessing over gay bars, bathhouses and drag queens?]]</sup> 20:30, July 12, 2026 (EDT)