SkipCaptcha
35,519
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 199:
Line 199: + + + + + + +
Talk:Ku Klux Klan (view source)
Revision as of 14:23, September 25, 2023
, 14:23, September 25, 2023→Very interesting analysis I came across: new section
What was '''very different''' about them? Weren't they all pro-white and anti-black? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:34, 8 May 2012 (EDT)
What was '''very different''' about them? Weren't they all pro-white and anti-black? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:34, 8 May 2012 (EDT)
== Very interesting analysis I came across ==
I know that LaRouchies are fringe leftists, though [https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1993/eirv20n14-19930409/eirv20n14-19930409_030-masons_conspire_for_world_power.pdf this is highly fascinating]:
{{cquote|...the new masonic President, Andrew Johnson, issued <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Albert Pike]]] a pardon. The nationalist leader of the U.S. Congress, [[Thaddeus Stevens]], a fierce opponent of Freemasonry, launched Reconstruction to overthrow the Southern oligarchy and to ensure rights to the blacks newly freed from slavery.|||EIR, p. 32, Apr. 9, 1993}}
Sounds spot-on. Stevens, an adherent of classical liberal ideals, seemed to despised Freemasonry from his early years, evident in his early crusades in the [[Anti-Masonic Party]]. The civil rights battle of [[Reconstruction]] as a fight between anti-Masonic Christian racial egalitarians and Masonic white supremacist Klansmen is... very interesting. —[[User:LT|<code><span style="background:#FF8181">'''LT'''</span></code>]] '''''[[User talk:LT|<sup>Rev. 22:13</sup>]]''''' Monday, 10:23, September 25, 2023 (EDT)