Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 1,681: Line 1,681:  
::::::::Sure he does. Yes. IMO, I think it's rude (unless it's trolling). But your posting obviously was polite and in good faith. Other editors see that he didn't leave it, he didn't Archive it, just reverted it. So they don't bother trying to communicate with him because they don't want to be treated like a cockroach, either. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 19:35, September 25, 2023 (EDT)
 
::::::::Sure he does. Yes. IMO, I think it's rude (unless it's trolling). But your posting obviously was polite and in good faith. Other editors see that he didn't leave it, he didn't Archive it, just reverted it. So they don't bother trying to communicate with him because they don't want to be treated like a cockroach, either. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 19:35, September 25, 2023 (EDT)
   −
See what I mean? Here he engages in shameless self-promotion, citing [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia&diff=next&oldid=1986175 Lewis Black as having helped advance his career]. When I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative/mail&diff=next&oldid=1986905 make suggestions or offer to help] to hide his [[conflict of interest]], he treats me like a conckroach. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 19:59, September 25, 2023 (EDT)
+
::::::See what I mean? Here he engages in shameless self-promotion, citing [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia&diff=next&oldid=1986175 Lewis Black as having helped advance his career]. When I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative/mail&diff=next&oldid=1986905 make suggestions or offer to help] to hide his [[conflict of interest]], he treats me like a conckroach. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 19:59, September 25, 2023 (EDT)
    
== The failure of the Chinese Communist Regime and its economy  appears to be happening faster than I thought and I think it will accelerate. I think I will look at geopolitics again in 2028 instead of 2030 ==
 
== The failure of the Chinese Communist Regime and its economy  appears to be happening faster than I thought and I think it will accelerate. I think I will look at geopolitics again in 2028 instead of 2030 ==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
296,327

edits

Navigation menu