4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: − + + + + +
Debate:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias? (view source)
Revision as of 20:58, March 7, 2007
, 20:58, March 7, 2007no edit summary
:::: DP, your argument above assumes that any fact might exist that would bring a major tenet of conservatism crashing down. Games, must we? What ''fact'' do you wish to assert that you believe would be unflattering to conservatism?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]] 10:00, 7 March 2007 (EST)
:::: DP, your argument above assumes that any fact might exist that would bring a major tenet of conservatism crashing down. Games, must we? What ''fact'' do you wish to assert that you believe would be unflattering to conservatism?--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]] 10:00, 7 March 2007 (EST)
:::::I take it then that you take position number 3? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:56, 7 March 2007 (EST)
:::::I gather then that you take position number 3? Let me phrase it in a less extreme form, thus:
:::::3a) Questions 1 and 2 need not receive serious consideration, because there are no facts that would conflict with any major tenet of conservatism.
:::::Is that fair? [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 15:58, 7 March 2007 (EST)
==A story about the Christian Science Monitor==
==A story about the Christian Science Monitor==