Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,170
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: + + + + + + + + + +
→The most frequent terms in LGBTI Gleichschaltung
==== "[[Gay rights]]" ====
==== "[[Gay rights]]" ====
LGBTI lobbyists make efforts to equate sodomy, a pattern of perverse behavior between people of same sex involving anal or oral sex, with a civil right.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |url=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2vyqzf |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil rights movement...Sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It is a pattern of behavior.”|accessdate=2 june 2016}}</ref><ref name="FRC2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF07K01.pdf |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref><ref name="Sprigg2004">{{cite book |title=Outrage: How Gay Activists and Liberal Judges are Trashing Democracy to Redefine Marriage |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Regnery |year=2004 |place=Washington, D.C. |isbn= 978-08952-60215 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=2HqwAAAAIAAJ |quote=…the Supreme Court has never declared sexual orientation to be a protected class under civil rights laws… }}</ref> This [[psychological manipulation|manipulative]] effort often involves trickery that can be called ''[[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBTI Bundling]]'', tactic of wrapping practitioners of perverse sexual behavior in the cloak of civil rights by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. In [[Bowers v. Hardwick]], the [[US Supreme Court]] ruled, that claiming, as LGBTI advocates do,<ref name="William Eskridge">{{cite web |url=http://wtvr.com/2012/05/18/marshall-sodomy-is-not-a-civil-rights-movement/ |title=Marshall: ‘Sodomy is not a civil right’ |author=Wtvrerikaneddenien |publisher=WTVR |date=18 May 2012 |quote=William Eskridge, a Yale Law School professor, has spoken out against Marshall's statement, saying sodomy is, in a practical sense, a civil right--according to the Supreme Court...“The Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence that anal or oral sex, commonly known as sodomy, when performed in private by consenting adults, is constitutionally protected -- which makes it a civil right,” Eskridge told MSNBC. |accessdate=2 June 2016}}</ref> a right to engage in sodomitical [[Behavior|conduct]] and argue that it is ''"deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition"'' or ''"implicit in the concept of ordered liberty"'', is, at best, facetious. The [[U.S. Constitution]] does not confer a fundamental right upon [[homosexuals]] to engage in sodomy.
LGBTI lobbyists make efforts to equate sodomy, a pattern of perverse behavior between people of same sex involving anal or oral sex, with a civil right.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |url=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2vyqzf |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil rights movement...Sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It is a pattern of behavior.”|accessdate=2 june 2016}}</ref><ref name="FRC2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF07K01.pdf |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref><ref name="Sprigg2004">{{cite book |title=Outrage: How Gay Activists and Liberal Judges are Trashing Democracy to Redefine Marriage |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Regnery |year=2004 |place=Washington, D.C. |isbn= 978-08952-60215 |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=2HqwAAAAIAAJ |quote=…the Supreme Court has never declared sexual orientation to be a protected class under civil rights laws… }}</ref> This [[psychological manipulation|manipulative]] effort often involves trickery that can be called ''[[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBTI Bundling]]'', tactic of wrapping practitioners of perverse sexual behavior in the cloak of civil rights by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. In [[Bowers v. Hardwick]], the [[US Supreme Court]] ruled, that claiming, as LGBTI advocates do,<ref name="William Eskridge">{{cite web |url=http://wtvr.com/2012/05/18/marshall-sodomy-is-not-a-civil-rights-movement/ |title=Marshall: ‘Sodomy is not a civil right’ |author=Wtvrerikaneddenien |publisher=WTVR |date=18 May 2012 |quote=William Eskridge, a Yale Law School professor, has spoken out against Marshall's statement, saying sodomy is, in a practical sense, a civil right--according to the Supreme Court...“The Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence that anal or oral sex, commonly known as sodomy, when performed in private by consenting adults, is constitutionally protected -- which makes it a civil right,” Eskridge told MSNBC. |accessdate=2 June 2016}}</ref> a right to engage in sodomitical [[Behavior|conduct]] and argue that it is ''"deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition"'' or ''"implicit in the concept of ordered liberty"'', is, at best, facetious. The [[U.S. Constitution]] does not confer a fundamental right upon [[homosexuals]] to engage in sodomy.
====Vladimir Putin on LGBTI ideology====
On November 9, 2022, President [[President Vladimir Putin]] of the [[Russian Federation]] signed the decree “On Approval of the Fundamentals of State Policy for the Preservation and Strengthening of Traditional Russian Spiritual and Moral Values”,<ref>http://actual.pravo.gov.ru/text.html#pnum=0001202211090019</ref> wherein it declared:
{{quotebox-float|“The activities of [[extremist]] and [[terrorist]] organizations, certain [[mass media]] and mass communications, the actions of the [[United States of America]] and other unfriendly foreign states, a number of transnational corporations and foreign [[non-profit organization]]s, as well as the activities of certain organizations and individuals on the territory of Russia, pose a threat to [[traditional values]].
The [[ideological]] and [[psychological]] impact on [[citizen]]s leads to the planting of a system of ideas and values alien to the Russian people and destructive to Russian [[society]] (hereinafter referred to as destructive ideology), including the cultivation of selfishness, permissiveness, [[immoral]]ity, the denial of the ideals of [[patriotism]], service to the Fatherland, the natural continuation of life, values strong [[family]], [[marriage]], large families, creative [[work]], Russia's positive contribution to [[world history]] and [[culture]], the destruction of the traditional family through the promotion of non-traditional [[sexual]] relations.
The destructive ideological impact on the citizens of Russia is becoming a threat to the [[demographic]] situation in the country.
The activities of public legal entities, organizations and individuals that contribute to the spread of destructive ideology pose an objective threat to the national interests of the Russian Federation.”}}
==== Sexual orientation ====
==== Sexual orientation ====