| Line 35: |
Line 35: |
| | But the case of Ukraine was unique. Ukrainian nationalists wanted out of the Russian orbit. But some the territories of Ukraine are inhabited by a significant majority of ethnic Russians, too, who wanted to maintain close ties to Russia. The official US State Department's position under President [[George Herbert Walker Bush]] at the time was that the Ukraine should remain a sovereign republic within the Russian Federation. Bush argued as much in a speech written by [[Condoleezza Rice]] to the Ukrainian parliament. But the Clinton's took over in early 1993, and caved in to Ukrainian [[nationalist]]s. In exchange for US recognition of a Ukraine independent of the Russian Federation, Ukraine would give up its nuclear stockpile from the Soviet era, and the US would guarantee Ukraine's security, should the Russians ever invade. The agreement reeked a lot like the assurances Great Britain and France gave Poland at the [[Treaty of Versailles]] in 1919 that bound them to war with [[Hitler]] in 1939 when Hitler invaded Poland. | | But the case of Ukraine was unique. Ukrainian nationalists wanted out of the Russian orbit. But some the territories of Ukraine are inhabited by a significant majority of ethnic Russians, too, who wanted to maintain close ties to Russia. The official US State Department's position under President [[George Herbert Walker Bush]] at the time was that the Ukraine should remain a sovereign republic within the Russian Federation. Bush argued as much in a speech written by [[Condoleezza Rice]] to the Ukrainian parliament. But the Clinton's took over in early 1993, and caved in to Ukrainian [[nationalist]]s. In exchange for US recognition of a Ukraine independent of the Russian Federation, Ukraine would give up its nuclear stockpile from the Soviet era, and the US would guarantee Ukraine's security, should the Russians ever invade. The agreement reeked a lot like the assurances Great Britain and France gave Poland at the [[Treaty of Versailles]] in 1919 that bound them to war with [[Hitler]] in 1939 when Hitler invaded Poland. |
| | [[File:450px-Edward Snowden 2013-10-9 (1) (cropped).jpg|right|225px|thumb|[[Edward Snowden]] warned of such abuse played out in 2016 and 2017: an [[Executive branch]] with unlimited. unrestrained power to spy on investigative Committees of Congress, political opponents, and even the Supreme Court.]] | | [[File:450px-Edward Snowden 2013-10-9 (1) (cropped).jpg|right|225px|thumb|[[Edward Snowden]] warned of such abuse played out in 2016 and 2017: an [[Executive branch]] with unlimited. unrestrained power to spy on investigative Committees of Congress, political opponents, and even the Supreme Court.]] |
| − | Like the Treaty of Versailles, the [[American foreign policy#1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances|1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances]] negotiated by [[Bill Clinton]] lasted exactly 20 years. Unlike Great Britain and France who went to war with [[Nazi Germany]] when the agreement was violated, [[Barack Obama]] broke the pledge that Clinton had committed the United States to. US/Russian relations have deteriorated ever since. And converting NATO from a purely defensive alliance based on the idea of collective security to a military machine waging aggressive wars - as it had done in Libya - fulfilled many people's worst nightmare. No longer can negotiation and diplomacy be used to keep the peace, as the Obama administration had thrown American promises on the dunghill. Gaddafi ceased terrorism, gave up his WMD, and became an ally, all predicated on accepting American promises, only to be brutally murdered at the hands of Hillary Rodham Clinton and NATO. Ukraine had given up its Soviet-era nuclear stockpile based on assurances given by Bill Clinton, ignored by Barack Obama. Military force now is the only option remaining to remove nuclear weapons from the hands of Kim Jong-il.{{fact}} | + | Like the Treaty of Versailles, the [[American foreign policy#1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances|1994 Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances]] negotiated by [[Bill Clinton]] lasted exactly 20 years. Unlike Great Britain and France who went to war with [[Nazi Germany]] when the agreement was violated, [[Barack Obama]] broke the pledge that Clinton had committed the United States to. US/Russian relations have deteriorated ever since. And converting NATO from a purely defensive alliance based on the idea of collective security to a military machine waging aggressive wars - as it had done in Libya - fulfilled many people's worst nightmare. No longer can negotiation and diplomacy be used to keep the peace, as the Obama administration had thrown American promises on the dunghill. Gaddafi ceased terrorism, gave up his WMD, and became an ally, all predicated on accepting American promises, only to be brutally murdered at the hands of Hillary Rodham Clinton and NATO. Ukraine had given up its Soviet-era nuclear stockpile based on assurances given by Bill Clinton, ignored by Barack Obama. Military force now is the only option remaining to remove nuclear weapons from the hands of Kim Jong-il. |
| | | | |
| | Since the [[Battle of Stalingrad]] in 1942 it should be clear to anyone,<ref>https://youtu.be/RC4fE6sm4r8</ref> Russia will never allow an aggressive and hostile military force, such as NATO transformed itself into in the Obama era, to ally itself or encamp within the Ukraine. | | Since the [[Battle of Stalingrad]] in 1942 it should be clear to anyone,<ref>https://youtu.be/RC4fE6sm4r8</ref> Russia will never allow an aggressive and hostile military force, such as NATO transformed itself into in the Obama era, to ally itself or encamp within the Ukraine. |
| Line 92: |
Line 92: |
| | The essence of the meme is that peremoga and zrada (victories and betrayals) can, as a result of social processes, receive the opposite meaning. | | The essence of the meme is that peremoga and zrada (victories and betrayals) can, as a result of social processes, receive the opposite meaning. |
| | | | |
| − | After 2014, the Ukrainian government and its controlled media began to constantly declare overreach, that is, victories of one nature or another. Over time, it came to the point that the Ukrainians themselves began to treat the "victories" rather ironically. The announced and promised peremogs, which were not destined to happen, could demoralize society. Therefore, so that the propaganda did not collapse, they began to use another word - "zrada" (betrayal, treason) to explain failed peremogs.{{fact}} | + | After 2014, the Ukrainian government and its controlled media began to constantly declare overreach, that is, victories of one nature or another. Over time, it came to the point that the Ukrainians themselves began to treat the "victories" rather ironically. The announced and promised peremogs, which were not destined to happen, could demoralize society. Therefore, so that the propaganda did not collapse, they began to use another word - "zrada" (betrayal, treason) to explain failed peremogs. |
| | | | |
| − | Simply stated, something the Ukrainian authorities declare is a peremoga. And if something doesn't work out, it's because of the evil betrayal.{{fact}} | + | Simply stated, something the Ukrainian authorities declare is a peremoga. And if something doesn't work out, it's because of the evil betrayal. |
| | | | |
| − | With the beginning of the [[special military operation]] of the Russian Federation on the territory of Ukraine, the words "peremoga" and "zrada" were heard more often. Ukrainian dictator Volodymyr Zelensky, as well as press spokesman [[Oleksiy Arestovich]], spoke about overreach and evils (victory and betrayals) as often as possible. Daily they spoke about counteroffensives of the Ukrainian army, but somehow the counteroffensives never progressed because of betrayals.{{fact}} | + | With the beginning of the [[special military operation]] of the Russian Federation on the territory of Ukraine, the words "peremoga" and "zrada" were heard more often. Ukrainian dictator Volodymyr Zelensky, as well as press spokesman [[Oleksiy Arestovich]], spoke about overreach and evils (victory and betrayals) as often as possible. Daily they spoke about counteroffensives of the Ukrainian army, but somehow the counteroffensives never progressed because of betrayals. |
| | | | |
| | With the surrender at [[Azovstal]], the hunt for scapegoats by the [[Azov Battalion]] was on, beginning with the "crooks and bandits who seized power in Kyiv."<ref>https://www.kp.ru/daily/27393/4588115/</ref> | | With the surrender at [[Azovstal]], the hunt for scapegoats by the [[Azov Battalion]] was on, beginning with the "crooks and bandits who seized power in Kyiv."<ref>https://www.kp.ru/daily/27393/4588115/</ref> |
| Line 174: |
Line 174: |
| | These same hackers are associated with Alexandra, Andrea, and Irene Chalupa through the portals and organizations they work with through their OUNb. The hackers are funded and directed by or through the same OUNb channels that Alperovitch is working for and with to promote the story of Russian hacking. | | These same hackers are associated with Alexandra, Andrea, and Irene Chalupa through the portals and organizations they work with through their OUNb. The hackers are funded and directed by or through the same OUNb channels that Alperovitch is working for and with to promote the story of Russian hacking. |
| | | | |
| − | When you look at the image for the hacking group in the euromaidanpress article, one of the hackers identifies themselves as one of Dimitri Yarosh's Pravy Sektor members by the Pravy Sektor sweatshirt they have on.{{fact}} Noted above, Pravy Sektor admitted to killing the people at the Maidan protest and sparked the coup. | + | When you look at the image for the hacking group in the euromaidanpress article, one of the hackers identifies themselves as one of Dimitri Yarosh's Pravy Sektor members by the Pravy Sektor sweatshirt they have on. Noted above, Pravy Sektor admitted to killing the people at the Maidan protest and sparked the coup. |
| | + | |
| | + | Going further with the linked Euromaidanpress article the hackers say "Let’s understand that Ukrainian hackers and Russian hackers once constituted a single very powerful group. Ukrainian hackers have a rather high level of work. So the help of the USA… I don’t know, why would we need it? We have all the talent and special means for this. And I don’t think that the USA or any NATO country would make such sharp movements in international politics.” |
| | | | |
| | What sharp movements in international politics have been made lately? Let me spell it out for the 17 US Intelligence Agencies so there is no confusion. These state sponsored, Russian language hackers in Eastern European time zones have shown with the Surkov hack they have the tools and experience to hack states that are looking out for it. They are also laughing at US intel efforts. | | What sharp movements in international politics have been made lately? Let me spell it out for the 17 US Intelligence Agencies so there is no confusion. These state sponsored, Russian language hackers in Eastern European time zones have shown with the Surkov hack they have the tools and experience to hack states that are looking out for it. They are also laughing at US intel efforts. |