| Line 1,602: |
Line 1,602: |
| | Nice! Thanks for sharing. I hope for a US-India Democratic Alliance, which I think would be good to counter Non-Democratic Commie China. But yes, this is nice to see. It shows Democracy can truly create a pathway to Prosperity through education and hard work, and being from India, I am happy about it. I would credit [[Manmohan Singh]] who first as Finance Minister then in 10 years as PM helped India to grow fast. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 12:46, September 11, 2023 (EDT) | | Nice! Thanks for sharing. I hope for a US-India Democratic Alliance, which I think would be good to counter Non-Democratic Commie China. But yes, this is nice to see. It shows Democracy can truly create a pathway to Prosperity through education and hard work, and being from India, I am happy about it. I would credit [[Manmohan Singh]] who first as Finance Minister then in 10 years as PM helped India to grow fast. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 12:46, September 11, 2023 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | == Request for feedback on my essay Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy? == | + | == Request for feedback on my essay Why did so many self-appointed geopolitics experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy? == |
| | | | |
| − | I wrote the essay [[Essay: Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?|Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?]] | + | I wrote the essay [[Essay: Why did so many self-appointed geopolitics experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?|Why did so many self-appointed geopolitics experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?]] |
| | | | |
| | I give 4 major reasons why this happened. Can you think of any other major reasons? | | I give 4 major reasons why this happened. Can you think of any other major reasons? |
| | | | |
| − | If so, please post them at: [[Talk:Essay: Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?]] | + | If so, please post them at: [[Talk:Essay: Why did so many self-appointed geopolitics experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?]] |
| | | | |
| | If I like them, I will add them to the essay. | | If I like them, I will add them to the essay. |
| Line 1,683: |
Line 1,683: |
| | ::::::See what I mean? Here he engages in shameless self-promotion, citing [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia&diff=next&oldid=1986175 Lewis Black as having helped advance his career]. When I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative/mail&diff=next&oldid=1986905 make suggestions or offer to help] to hide his [[conflict of interest]], he treats me like a conckroach. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 19:59, September 25, 2023 (EDT) | | ::::::See what I mean? Here he engages in shameless self-promotion, citing [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia&diff=next&oldid=1986175 Lewis Black as having helped advance his career]. When I [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative/mail&diff=next&oldid=1986905 make suggestions or offer to help] to hide his [[conflict of interest]], he treats me like a conckroach. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 19:59, September 25, 2023 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| − | == The failure of the Chinese Communist Regime and its economy appears to be happening faster than I thought and I think it will accelerate. I think I will look at international relations again in 2028 instead of 2030 == | + | == The failure of the Chinese Communist Regime and its economy appears to be happening faster than I thought and I think it will accelerate. I think I will look at geopolitics again in 2028 instead of 2030 == |
| | | | |
| | I know that you are not a big fan of China/Putin. I did some additional research and it appears as if China will economy will unravel faster than I thought. Of course, this is bad news for Russia (See: [[Essay: Russia's economy and gas and oil profits will be BADLY damaged when China's economy declines|Russia's economy and gas and oil profits will be BADLY damaged when China's economy declines]] and [[Essay: A Chinese economic collapse will be Russia's downfall|A Chinese economic collapse will be Russia's downfall]]). | | I know that you are not a big fan of China/Putin. I did some additional research and it appears as if China will economy will unravel faster than I thought. Of course, this is bad news for Russia (See: [[Essay: Russia's economy and gas and oil profits will be BADLY damaged when China's economy declines|Russia's economy and gas and oil profits will be BADLY damaged when China's economy declines]] and [[Essay: A Chinese economic collapse will be Russia's downfall|A Chinese economic collapse will be Russia's downfall]]). |
| Line 1,691: |
Line 1,691: |
| | Also, I updated the essay: [[Essay: The rising rule of communist idiocracy in China|The rising rule of communist idiocracy in China]]. Please see: [https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_The_rising_rule_of_communist_idiocracy_in_China#China_has_likely_peaked_arguments China has peaked arguments]. | | Also, I updated the essay: [[Essay: The rising rule of communist idiocracy in China|The rising rule of communist idiocracy in China]]. Please see: [https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_The_rising_rule_of_communist_idiocracy_in_China#China_has_likely_peaked_arguments China has peaked arguments]. |
| | | | |
| − | In the fairly recent past, a China cheerleader recommended that I watch some video on why the news reports are too negative about China. I watched a few minutes of it before it became very apparent that it was leftist lunacy. While some reports of China's economic problems and their implications are exaggerated, I have updated my opinion about how fast China will decline. I think I will look at international relations again in 2028. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:52, September 25, 2023 (EDT) | + | In the fairly recent past, a China cheerleader recommended that I watch some video on why the news reports are too negative about China. I watched a few minutes of it before it became very apparent that it was leftist lunacy. While some reports of China's economic problems and their implications are exaggerated, I have updated my opinion about how fast China will decline. I think I will look at geopolitics again in 2028. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:52, September 25, 2023 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | :NX, Remember what my father-in-law said. This guy just loves to latch onto internet users and troll people. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:03, September 25, 2023 (EDT) | | :NX, Remember what my father-in-law said. This guy just loves to latch onto internet users and troll people. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 16:03, September 25, 2023 (EDT) |
| Line 1,729: |
Line 1,729: |
| | Conservative wrote a Hugely Popular Article for Conservapedia on Atheism - https://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism - which has over 7 MN views. Those are good fruits, so I won't agree with those who are claiming this or that against him, Rob. I suggest we all get back to our areas of expertise and strength in producing Great Content for Conservapedia, and helping it across the 900 Million mark soon. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 17:56, September 25, 2023 (EDT) | | Conservative wrote a Hugely Popular Article for Conservapedia on Atheism - https://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism - which has over 7 MN views. Those are good fruits, so I won't agree with those who are claiming this or that against him, Rob. I suggest we all get back to our areas of expertise and strength in producing Great Content for Conservapedia, and helping it across the 900 Million mark soon. [[User:NishantXavier|NishantXavier]]<sup>[[User talk:NishantXavier|For Christ the King]]</sup> 17:56, September 25, 2023 (EDT) |
| | ::That was 16 years ago when CP first started. The numbers haven't moved much since. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 19:21, September 25, 2023 (EDT) | | ::That was 16 years ago when CP first started. The numbers haven't moved much since. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Give Peace a Chance!'']]</sup> 19:21, September 25, 2023 (EDT) |
| − | :My knowledge of international reliaations is certainly trumping someone's knowledge and wrongheaded notions who has been following international relations for a number of years. China's current economic unraveling and the problems it will cause Russia is evidence of this. Instead of being very mad about this, I think he should carefully read my essay [[Essay: Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?|Why did so many self-declared international relations experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?]]. If he tried to falsify his political notions and kept a record of the times he was wrong, he might be improving his understanding of geopolitics instead of plateauing or moving backward. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:16, September 25, 2023 (EDT) | + | :My knowledge of geopolitics is certainly trumping someone's knowledge and wrongheaded notions who has been following geopolitics for a number of years. China's current economic unraveling and the problems it will cause Russia is evidence of this. Instead of being very mad about this, I think he should carefully read my essay [[Essay: Why did so many self-appointed geopolitics experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?|Why did so many self-appointed geopolitics experts miserably fail concerning their multipolar fantasy?]]. If he tried to falsify his political notions and kept a record of the times he was wrong, he might be improving his understanding of geopolitics instead of plateauing or moving backward. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:16, September 25, 2023 (EDT) |
| | | | |
| | ::Oh yah, I forgot. You're the [[Machiavellianism (psychology)|Machiavellian]] [[Realpolitik|realist]], student of [[Karl Haushofer]], and CP's resident geopolitical expert. | | ::Oh yah, I forgot. You're the [[Machiavellianism (psychology)|Machiavellian]] [[Realpolitik|realist]], student of [[Karl Haushofer]], and CP's resident geopolitical expert. |