Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
308 bytes added ,  08:25, October 20, 2023
Line 263: Line 263:     
In 2006, the mathematical establishment delivered another backhanded compliment to Perelman's achievement: he was awarded the [[Fields Medal]] on a shared basis with (1) an Obama-supporter who had jointly worked on a number theory problem, (2) a French mathematician-actor, and (3) a younger countryman who had achieved far less.  This four-way split of the prize with far less significant achievements was inappropriate.  Perelman declined this prize also.
 
In 2006, the mathematical establishment delivered another backhanded compliment to Perelman's achievement: he was awarded the [[Fields Medal]] on a shared basis with (1) an Obama-supporter who had jointly worked on a number theory problem, (2) a French mathematician-actor, and (3) a younger countryman who had achieved far less.  This four-way split of the prize with far less significant achievements was inappropriate.  Perelman declined this prize also.
 +
 +
== Book on the failings of many political experts when it comes to forecasting and what differentiates political forecasters who achieve superior results ==
 +
 +
*''Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?'' by Philip E. Tetlock, Princeton University Press; New Ed edition (August 20, 2006).
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920

edits

Navigation menu