Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
187 bytes added ,  23:39, March 7, 2007
see talk
Line 1: Line 1: −
Atheism, in common usage, means "lack of belief in any Gods".  In practice, Atheists often discount supernatural phenomena such as the afterlife, divine revelation, ghosts as well as God.
+
Atheism, in common usage, means "lack of belief in any Gods".  In practice, Atheists discounts supernatural phenomena such as the afterlife, divine revelation, ghosts as well as God.
    
Atheism is popularly divided into Strong and Weak Atheism:  Strong Atheism can be defined as a dogma in itself: The assertion that there absolutely is no God, despite the fact that the existence of the supernatural cannot be disproven. Some people calling themselves Atheists acknowledge that God can not be disproven, and while this does not suggest that there *is* a god (no more than the fact that we cannot disprove leprechauns suggests that they exist) it would nonetheless be unscientific to declare a God or godlike being impossible. These people are actually Agnostics.
 
Atheism is popularly divided into Strong and Weak Atheism:  Strong Atheism can be defined as a dogma in itself: The assertion that there absolutely is no God, despite the fact that the existence of the supernatural cannot be disproven. Some people calling themselves Atheists acknowledge that God can not be disproven, and while this does not suggest that there *is* a god (no more than the fact that we cannot disprove leprechauns suggests that they exist) it would nonetheless be unscientific to declare a God or godlike being impossible. These people are actually Agnostics.
Line 11: Line 11:  
Atheists often subscribe to the secular humanist idea that it is far more ethical to do what is right simply because you feel that it's right, rather than because you fear divine punishment.
 
Atheists often subscribe to the secular humanist idea that it is far more ethical to do what is right simply because you feel that it's right, rather than because you fear divine punishment.
   −
The common argument that Nazism and Stalinism were atheistic in nature and that their violence stemmed from that nature ignores more recent examples of what they actually were; Personality cults. Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, and more recently despots like Kim Jong Il and Fidel Castro were or are at the center of governments which enforce reverence unto them as though they were deities.   
+
The common argument that Nazism and Stalinism were atheistic in nature and that their violence stemmed from that nature ignores more recent examples of what they actually were; Personality cults. Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, and more recently despots like Kim Jong Il and Fidel Castro were or are at the center of governments which enforce reverence unto them as though they were deities.  Regardless of this it is obvious that no democracy has ever elected a leader who did not believe in God or a higher power.  Thus it can be concluded that God guides the leaders of democracies.
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
263

edits

Navigation menu