Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
280 bytes added ,  16:38, November 8, 2023
no edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:  
''[[The Economist]]'' reported on November 7, 2023:
 
''[[The Economist]]'' reported on November 7, 2023:
 
{{quotebox-float|“General Zaluzhny’s assessment is sobering: there is no sign that a technological breakthrough, whether in drones or in electronic warfare, is around the corner. And technology has its limits. Even in the [[first world war]], the arrival of [[tank]]s in 1917 was not sufficient to break the deadlock on the battlefield. It took a suite of technologies, and more than a decade of tactical innovation, to produce the [[German]] [[blitzkrieg]] in May 1940. The implication is that Ukraine is stuck in a long war—one in which he acknowledges Russia has the advantage. Nevertheless, he insists that Ukraine has no choice but to keep the initiative by remaining on the offensive, even if it only moves by a few metres a day.”<ref>[https://consortiumnews.com/2023/11/07/is-an-end-game-in-sight-for-ukraine/ Is an End Game in Sight for Ukraine?], By Tony Kevin, ''Consortium News'', November 7, 2023. consortiumnews.com</ref>}}
 
{{quotebox-float|“General Zaluzhny’s assessment is sobering: there is no sign that a technological breakthrough, whether in drones or in electronic warfare, is around the corner. And technology has its limits. Even in the [[first world war]], the arrival of [[tank]]s in 1917 was not sufficient to break the deadlock on the battlefield. It took a suite of technologies, and more than a decade of tactical innovation, to produce the [[German]] [[blitzkrieg]] in May 1940. The implication is that Ukraine is stuck in a long war—one in which he acknowledges Russia has the advantage. Nevertheless, he insists that Ukraine has no choice but to keep the initiative by remaining on the offensive, even if it only moves by a few metres a day.”<ref>[https://consortiumnews.com/2023/11/07/is-an-end-game-in-sight-for-ukraine/ Is an End Game in Sight for Ukraine?], By Tony Kevin, ''Consortium News'', November 7, 2023. consortiumnews.com</ref>}}
−
[[TIME magazine]] did a cover story on Ukrainian dictator [[Volodymyr Zelensky]] exposing some “politically inconvenient” truths about Ukraine, particularly that some front-line commanders were refusing suicidal orders to advance even when they come from Zelensky's office.<ref>[https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/10/the-war-is-lost-zelenski-will-leave-the-white-house-has-failed.html The War Is Lost - Zelenski Will Leave - The White House Has Failed], Moon of Alabama, October 31, 2023.</ref>
+
[[TIME magazine]] did a cover story on Ukrainian dictator [[Volodymyr Zelensky]] exposing some “politically inconvenient” truths about Ukraine, particularly that some front-line commanders were refusing suicidal orders to advance even when they come from Zelensky's office.<ref>[https://www.moonofalabama.org/2023/10/the-war-is-lost-zelenski-will-leave-the-white-house-has-failed.html The War Is Lost - Zelenski Will Leave - The White House Has Failed], Moon of Alabama, October 31, 2023.</ref> ''[[The New York Times]]'' did a rare act of factual reporting in an article entitled, ''Zelensky Rebuke of Top General Signals Rift in Ukrainian Leadership'', normalizing discussion of the Zelesnky-Zaluzhny rivalry which hitherto had been dismissed as a "[[conspiracy theory]]".
    
==References==
 
==References==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,727

edits

Navigation menu