SkipCaptcha
86
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1,010:
Line 1,010: + + + + + + +
User talk:ConwayIII (view source)
Revision as of 18:19, November 14, 2023
, 18:19, November 14, 2023→I am helping get the word out about how significant February 2020 was on the future of global politics
:::So if you can't prove they were associated with the [[Comintern]] or getting covert U.S. funding aid, then they must've have been Nazi-collaborators with the Vichy regime through a state-funded educational institution. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]</sup> 12:16, November 14, 2023 (EST)
:::So if you can't prove they were associated with the [[Comintern]] or getting covert U.S. funding aid, then they must've have been Nazi-collaborators with the Vichy regime through a state-funded educational institution. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Get thee behind me, Satan'']]</sup> 12:16, November 14, 2023 (EST)
Your [[guilt by association]] logical fallacy tactic failed miserably when the rubber meets the road. You tried to make the businessman [[Bill Browder]] a hardcore communist, but that crashed and burned when you couldn't find a single source. Also, your illogical fallacy of composition "reasoning" is equally a big failure. For example, just because I cited Zeihan about Russian demographics means that I necessarily agree with everything he claims and that I don't understand some of his weaknesses like his overreliance on geography, demographics, economic factors and his other faults (The same applies to Mearsheimer who I also don't agree with 100%).
But your greatest weakness is your lack of integrity which displays itself by making things up that you know are lies (Gossiping, Bill Browder is allegedly an avowed communist, and there are supposedly multiple sources that claim something when you know there are not such as the [[Karen Dawisha]] article). Everyone knows you are a liar and that is why you are not respected (But is also due to your abusive nature). And when I thought you could go no lower than being a pathological liar, you surprised even me by transforming yourself into high school girl-like gossiper with idiotic, far-fetched gossip so now I see you as being pathetically weak. As a result of your lack of integrity, you often engage in denialism (historical revisionism, etc.) because once someone lies to others prolifically, they naturally lie to themselves prolifically as well. Your attempt to whitewash Ivan the Terrible and Vladmir Putin are great examples of this as is your attempt to make Russia, which has low church attendance, big problems with alcoholism/AIDS, high divorce/abortion rates and a low fertility rate into some kind of holy nation. In addition, you pretend that Peter Zeihan is the only person whose work I cited about Russian demography, but that is untrue as evidenced by my citation of the Russian demographer Salavat Abylkalikov (See: [[Essay: Russia is dying out. The war in Ukraine is making Russia's demographic crisis even worse]]). I can accept cold hard truths such as US/Western foibles/weaknesses, but you can't do the same with Russia and China. For example, show me a nation that dramatically turned around its low fertility rate into a replacement fertility rate in the 21st century. You can't do it. The highest correlation with a replacement level of births in a population is religiosity and Russians are obviously not a holy nation.
In addition, your grasp of logic, critical thinking, statistical analysis, economics and cultures is substandard as well.
My biggest mistake was interacting with you too much via talk pages, etc. I am not going to make that mistake again. [[User:MarkLM8|MarkLM8]] ([[User talk:MarkLM8|talk]]) 13:19, November 14, 2023 (EST)