Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
I removed the guideline on the requirement to use the minor edit box. The owner doesn't super consistently use it neither do admins. The minor edit box hasn't been widely and consistently used by Conservapedians for 15 years
Line 205: Line 205:  
This section should either be redefined or this standard should be enforced. I was blocked by an assistant/junior administrator for what was apparently a policy violation a few days ago. Either formally grant these assistants more authority or enforce the status quo. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 14:10, 16 July 2017 (EDT)
 
This section should either be redefined or this standard should be enforced. I was blocked by an assistant/junior administrator for what was apparently a policy violation a few days ago. Either formally grant these assistants more authority or enforce the status quo. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 14:10, 16 July 2017 (EDT)
   −
== I removed the guideline on the requirement to use the minor edit button. The owner doesn't super consistently use it neither do admins. The button hasn't been widely used by Conservapedians for 15 years ==
+
== I removed the guideline on the requirement to use the minor edit box. The owner doesn't super consistently use it neither do admins. The minor edit box hasn't been widely and consistently used by Conservapedians for 15 years ==
    
I just eliminated the guideline on the requirement to use the minor edit button. The owner doesn't super consistently use it neither do admins. The button hasn't been widely super consistently used by Conservapedians for 15 years.
 
I just eliminated the guideline on the requirement to use the minor edit button. The owner doesn't super consistently use it neither do admins. The button hasn't been widely super consistently used by Conservapedians for 15 years.
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427

edits

Navigation menu