Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
66 bytes added ,  05:56, December 11, 2023
improved
Line 6: Line 6:     
The four books of the Gospels have fascinating differences in perspective, and [[ordering the Gospels|their best ordering]] can be debated:
 
The four books of the Gospels have fascinating differences in perspective, and [[ordering the Gospels|their best ordering]] can be debated:
−
*[[Gospel of Matthew]] - eyewitness account by [[the Apostles|an Apostle]], thorough with many powerful [[parables]], and expanded from the [[Gospel of Mark]]
+
*[[Gospel of Matthew]] - the longest eyewitness account, by [[the Apostles|the Apostle]] [[Matthew]]; thorough with many powerful [[parables]], expanding on the [[Gospel of Mark]]
−
*[[Gospel of Mark]] - first written, also by an eyewitness, this is concise, fearless, and irreverent towards [[the Apostles]] and the "Herodians".
+
*[[Gospel of Mark]] - first written, also by an eyewitness ([[Mark]]), this is concise, fearless, and irreverent towards [[the Apostles]] and the "Herodians".
−
*[[Gospel of Luke]] - the most beautiful book ever written, describes everything by an historian with elegance.
+
*[[Gospel of Luke]] - the most beautiful book ever written, this longest Gospel describes everything with the elegance of an historian.
−
*[[Gospel of John]] - an entirely independent eyewitness account by [[the Apostles|an Apostle]], and the most profound and theological.
+
*[[Gospel of John]] - an entirely independent eyewitness account by [[the Apostles|the Apostle]] [[John]], and the most profound and theological.
 
   
 
   
 
The first gospel chronologically was by Mark, probably a [[Gentile]], which is fearless of authorities and irreverent towards all other than Jesus.  Matthew then reused 97% of Mark's gospel,<ref>"Matthew adopted all but 304 of Mark's 11,025 words." [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/abs/matthews-use-of-mark-did-matthew-intend-to-supplement-or-to-replace-his-primary-source/2893B4D82A9178BDD6693A64A9237E53 New Testament Studies, published online by Cambridge University Press]</ref> omitting merely some of its boldness and irreverence, while adding more content.  The [[Gospel of John]] was completely independent, and thus a corroboration of what is found in the other Gospels.
 
The first gospel chronologically was by Mark, probably a [[Gentile]], which is fearless of authorities and irreverent towards all other than Jesus.  Matthew then reused 97% of Mark's gospel,<ref>"Matthew adopted all but 304 of Mark's 11,025 words." [https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/abs/matthews-use-of-mark-did-matthew-intend-to-supplement-or-to-replace-his-primary-source/2893B4D82A9178BDD6693A64A9237E53 New Testament Studies, published online by Cambridge University Press]</ref> omitting merely some of its boldness and irreverence, while adding more content.  The [[Gospel of John]] was completely independent, and thus a corroboration of what is found in the other Gospels.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu