Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Passion of the Christ (view source)

Revision as of 08:02, December 19, 2023

359 bytes added ,  08:02, December 19, 2023
→‎Christian Criticism: Two additional parts of this film are historically unlikely
Line 79: Line 79:  
While [[Christian]]s overwhelmingly welcomed and supported this film, valid criticisms exist. Gibson omitted the [[Resurrection]] from his first release, for example, and added an improvised scene later only based on negative audience reaction.
 
While [[Christian]]s overwhelmingly welcomed and supported this film, valid criticisms exist. Gibson omitted the [[Resurrection]] from his first release, for example, and added an improvised scene later only based on negative audience reaction.
   −
Gibson also features in his movie the [[Essay:Adultress Story|Adultress Story]], which is widely recognized as a forgery inserted later into the [[Gospel of John]], and Gibson even absurdly made [[Mary Magdalene]] the adultress woman.
+
Gibson features in his movie the [[Essay:Adultress Story|Adultress Story]], which is widely recognized as a forgery inserted later into the [[Gospel of John]], and Gibson even absurdly made [[Mary Magdalene]] the adultress woman.
 +
 
 +
Two additional parts of this film are historically unlikely:
 +
*the phrase inserted later in the [[Gospel of Luke]] having Jesus say, "Father, forgive them for they know not what they are doing"
 +
*showing the nails implausibly going through [[Jesus]]'s hands, rather than through his wrists as dictated by anatomy and physics and as shown in the [[Shroud of Turin]]
    
==References==
 
==References==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,208

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/2011417"

Navigation menu