Changes

A high moral standard cannot be reached or maintained unless it is generally accepted and understood by an overwhelming number of people.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Rage Against God |author=[[Peter Hitchens]] |publisher=www.continuumbooks.com |place=London, New York |year=2010 |chapter=6. Homo sovieticus |page=66 |isbn=978-1441-10572-1 |url=https://book.google.com/books?id=y3fOBAAAQBAJ }}</ref> The nineteenth century French [[economist]], statesman, and author [[Frédéric Bastiat]] warned that ''"When misguided [[public opinion]] honors what is despicable and despises what is honorable, punishes virtue and rewards vice, encourages what is harmful and discourages what is useful, applauds falsehood and smothers truth under indifference or insult, a nation turns its back on progress and can be restored only by the terrible lessons of catastrophe."''<ref>{{cite web |title=Economic Harmonies |author=Bastiat, Frédéric |publisher=Liberty Fund, Inc.; Econlib |pages=21.35 |url=http://www.econlib.org/library/Bastiat/basHar21.html#Chapter 21 |accessdate=May 17, 2015}}</ref> According to Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, such catastrophe took place in [[France]] in the first half of the 20th century after the invasion of the country by [[Nazi]] [[German]] army. Before, people had not realized the severity of the "sickness" of society, let alone that they were "sick" themselves. After the disaster of losing the national [[sovereignty]], they have learnt that they were "sick" thus the corresponding treatment could be initiated. The way for the future has been paved owing to comprehending their own egoism and vanity.<ref>{{cite book |title=Saint-Exupéry |author=Eric Deschodt |publisher=TATRAN |year=1987 (French original 1980) |pages=265, 319 |quote=Človek má strašnú chuť dolapiť toho, čo je zodpovedný za katastrofu...slabosť každého jednotlivca spôsobila spoločné nešťastie, ale v pochopení toho veľkého sebectva a márnomyseľnosti je začiatok cesty do budúcnosti. Ľudia si neuvedomovali vážnosť choroby, nevedeli že sú chorí. Teraz to vedia, teda môžu sa liečiť. |language=Slovak (translation, original in French)}}</ref>

A high moral standard cannot be reached or maintained unless it is generally accepted and understood by an overwhelming number of people.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Rage Against God |author=[[Peter Hitchens]] |publisher=www.continuumbooks.com |place=London, New York |year=2010 |chapter=6. Homo sovieticus |page=66 |isbn=978-1441-10572-1 |url=https://book.google.com/books?id=y3fOBAAAQBAJ }}</ref> The nineteenth century French [[economist]], statesman, and author [[Frédéric Bastiat]] warned that ''"When misguided [[public opinion]] honors what is despicable and despises what is honorable, punishes virtue and rewards vice, encourages what is harmful and discourages what is useful, applauds falsehood and smothers truth under indifference or insult, a nation turns its back on progress and can be restored only by the terrible lessons of catastrophe."''<ref>{{cite web |title=Economic Harmonies |author=Bastiat, Frédéric |publisher=Liberty Fund, Inc.; Econlib |pages=21.35 |url=http://www.econlib.org/library/Bastiat/basHar21.html#Chapter 21 |accessdate=May 17, 2015}}</ref> According to Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, such catastrophe took place in [[France]] in the first half of the 20th century after the invasion of the country by [[Nazi]] [[German]] army. Before, people had not realized the severity of the "sickness" of society, let alone that they were "sick" themselves. After the disaster of losing the national [[sovereignty]], they have learnt that they were "sick" thus the corresponding treatment could be initiated. The way for the future has been paved owing to comprehending their own egoism and vanity.<ref>{{cite book |title=Saint-Exupéry |author=Eric Deschodt |publisher=TATRAN |year=1987 (French original 1980) |pages=265, 319 |quote=Človek má strašnú chuť dolapiť toho, čo je zodpovedný za katastrofu...slabosť každého jednotlivca spôsobila spoločné nešťastie, ale v pochopení toho veľkého sebectva a márnomyseľnosti je začiatok cesty do budúcnosti. Ľudia si neuvedomovali vážnosť choroby, nevedeli že sú chorí. Teraz to vedia, teda môžu sa liečiť. |language=Slovak (translation, original in French)}}</ref>

== [[LGBT]]I Gleichschaltung ==

== [[LGBT]] Gleichschaltung ==

{| class="infobox bordered" style="font-size:95%; width:25em;"

{| class="infobox bordered" style="font-size:95%; width:25em;"

! style="font-size:120%; background:lightblue; text-align:center; padding:5px 0;" | About “new human rights”  

! style="font-size:120%; background:lightblue; text-align:center; padding:5px 0;" | About “new human rights”  

In his short [[satiric]] video sketch titled ''Modern Educayshun'', Neel Kolhatkar shows how policies of LGBTI Gleichschltung disguised under the label of [[Gender equality]] delve into the potential dangers of modern increasingly reactionary culture bred by social media and [[political correctness]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Educayshun |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&feature=youtu.be |author=Neel Kolhatkar |accessdate=6 December 2015}}</ref>

In his short [[satiric]] video sketch titled ''Modern Educayshun'', Neel Kolhatkar shows how policies of LGBTI Gleichschltung disguised under the label of [[Gender equality]] delve into the potential dangers of modern increasingly reactionary culture bred by social media and [[political correctness]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Modern Educayshun |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKcWu0tsiZM&feature=youtu.be |author=Neel Kolhatkar |accessdate=6 December 2015}}</ref>

=== The most frequent terms in LGBTI Gleichschaltung ===

=== The most frequent terms in LGBT Gleichschaltung ===

==== "[[Gay rights]]" ====

==== "[[Gay rights]]" ====

LGBTI lobbyists make efforts to equate sodomy, a pattern of perverse behavior between people of same sex involving anal or oral sex, with a civil right.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |url=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2vyqzf |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil rights movement...Sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It is a pattern of behavior.”|accessdate=2 june 2016}}</ref><ref name="FRC2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF07K01.pdf |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref><ref name="Sprigg2004">{{cite book |title=Outrage: How Gay Activists and Liberal Judges are Trashing Democracy to Redefine Marriage |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Regnery |year=2004 |place=Washington, D.C. |isbn= 978-08952-60215  |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=2HqwAAAAIAAJ |quote=…the Supreme Court has never declared sexual orientation to be a protected class under civil rights laws… }}</ref> This [[psychological manipulation|manipulative]] effort often involves trickery that can be called ''[[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBTI Bundling]]'', tactic of wrapping practitioners of perverse sexual behavior in the cloak of civil rights by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. In [[Bowers v. Hardwick]], the [[US Supreme Court]] ruled, that claiming, as LGBTI advocates do,<ref name="William Eskridge">{{cite web |url=http://wtvr.com/2012/05/18/marshall-sodomy-is-not-a-civil-rights-movement/ |title=Marshall: ‘Sodomy is not a civil right’ |author=Wtvrerikaneddenien |publisher=WTVR |date=18 May 2012 |quote=William Eskridge, a Yale Law School professor, has spoken out against Marshall's statement, saying sodomy is, in a practical sense, a civil right--according to the Supreme Court...“The Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence that anal or oral sex, commonly known as sodomy, when performed in private by consenting adults, is constitutionally protected -- which makes it a civil right,” Eskridge told MSNBC. |accessdate=2 June 2016}}</ref> a right to engage in sodomitical [[Behavior|conduct]] and argue that it is ''"deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition"'' or ''"implicit in the concept of ordered liberty"'', is, at best, facetious. The [[U.S. Constitution]] does not confer a fundamental right upon [[homosexuals]] to engage in sodomy.

LGBTI lobbyists make efforts to equate sodomy, a pattern of perverse behavior between people of same sex involving anal or oral sex, with a civil right.<ref>{{cite web |title=Sodomy is not a civil right |url=http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2vyqzf |quote=“Sodomy is not a civil rights movement...Sodomy is not a civil right, and there’s an effort by homosexual lobbyists to equate the two. That’s wrong. It is a pattern of behavior.”|accessdate=2 june 2016}}</ref><ref name="FRC2007">{{cite web |title=Homosexuality Is Not a Civil Right |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Family Research Council |date=2007 |place=Washington, D.C. |url=http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF07K01.pdf |quote=The stories of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr. have become an inspiring part of American history. It’s not surprising that homosexual activists have tried to hitch their caboose to the “civil rights” train. They do this in the context of efforts to change the definition of marriage in order to allow same-sex “marriages” (by comparing same-sex “marriage” to interracial marriage) and efforts to pass “hate crime” laws (which stigmatize opposition to homosexual behavior as a form of “hate” comparable to racism). |accessdate=18 Nov 2014}}</ref><ref name="Sprigg2004">{{cite book |title=Outrage: How Gay Activists and Liberal Judges are Trashing Democracy to Redefine Marriage |author=Peter Sprigg |publisher=Regnery |year=2004 |place=Washington, D.C. |isbn= 978-08952-60215  |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=2HqwAAAAIAAJ |quote=…the Supreme Court has never declared sexual orientation to be a protected class under civil rights laws… }}</ref> This [[psychological manipulation|manipulative]] effort often involves trickery that can be called ''[[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBTI Bundling]]'', tactic of wrapping practitioners of perverse sexual behavior in the cloak of civil rights by sponsoring coalitions of minorities and including themselves as a member minority. In [[Bowers v. Hardwick]], the [[US Supreme Court]] ruled, that claiming, as LGBTI advocates do,<ref name="William Eskridge">{{cite web |url=http://wtvr.com/2012/05/18/marshall-sodomy-is-not-a-civil-rights-movement/ |title=Marshall: ‘Sodomy is not a civil right’ |author=Wtvrerikaneddenien |publisher=WTVR |date=18 May 2012 |quote=William Eskridge, a Yale Law School professor, has spoken out against Marshall's statement, saying sodomy is, in a practical sense, a civil right--according to the Supreme Court...“The Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence that anal or oral sex, commonly known as sodomy, when performed in private by consenting adults, is constitutionally protected -- which makes it a civil right,” Eskridge told MSNBC. |accessdate=2 June 2016}}</ref> a right to engage in sodomitical [[Behavior|conduct]] and argue that it is ''"deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition"'' or ''"implicit in the concept of ordered liberty"'', is, at best, facetious. The [[U.S. Constitution]] does not confer a fundamental right upon [[homosexuals]] to engage in sodomy.