Changes

|2010

|2010

|PG

|PG

|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct based on the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can be seen as pro-environmentalist as well because some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries as opposed to caribou, despite wolves being natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are painted in an elitist light for being determined and hard workers. One female wolf named Kate can be described as a modern feminist. Similarly to the other liberal film ''Open Season'', it spawned multiple unneeded direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film called ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', only in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series called ''Back at the Barnyard'' as opposed to film sequels.

|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct based on the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can also be seen as pro-environmentalist because some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries instead of caribou, despite wolves being natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are painted in an elitist light for being determined and hardworking. One female wolf named Kate can be described as a modern feminist. Similar to the other liberal film, ''Open Season,'' it spawned multiple unneeded direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film called ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', only in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series called ''Back at the Barnyard'' instead of film sequels.

|$25,107,267

|$25,107,267

|-

|-

|2013-2017

|2013-2017

|PG

|PG

|These direct-to-video sequels follow the characters from the first ''Alpha and Omega'' movie, along with showing themes from that film. The sequels encourage disobedient behavior, for the pups of Kate and Humphrey often ignore their parents telling them to stay at home; they even try justifying this by telling their parents in the sixth movie that they get into "situations" by being told to be kind and caring. An instance of racism is shown in the fifth film by three porcupines being told to be friends because they look alike.

|These direct-to-video sequels follow the characters from the first ''Alpha and Omega'' movie and show the same themes from that film. The sequels encourage disobedient behavior, for the pups of Kate and Humphrey often ignore their parents telling them to stay at home; they even try justifying this by telling their parents in the sixth movie that they get into "situations" by being told to be kind and caring. An instance of racism is shown in the fifth film by three porcupines being told to be friends because they look alike.

|N/A (Direct to Video)

|N/A (Direct to Video)

|-

|-

|2010

|2010

|PG

|PG

|A goofy meerkat and a pacifistic lion journey with other animals from around the world (a polar bear, two tortoises, a kangaroo, a Tasmanian devil, and a rooster) to take down a dam built by humans, which had caused the Okavango Delta to dry up. This movie based on a children's book promotes a heavy environmentalist message, with the animals saying that all humans are causing bad things to happen all around the world (like causing a polar bear's snowy home to melt and letting the Outback catch on fire). The ending of the movie amps the environmental message up to eleven with many animals storming the cities, news reporters saying that the animals are going to make the humans pay for ruining the world.

|A goofy meerkat and a pacifistic lion journey with other animals from around the world (a polar bear, two tortoises, a kangaroo, a Tasmanian devil, and a rooster) to take down a dam built by humans, which had caused the Okavango Delta to dry up. This movie, based on a children's book, promotes a heavy environmentalist message, with the animals saying that all humans are causing bad things to happen worldwide (like causing a polar bear's snowy home to melt and letting the Outback catch on fire). The ending of the movie amps the environmental message up to eleven, with many animals storming the cities and news reporters saying that the animals are going to make humans pay for ruining the world.

|£2,133,051

|£2,133,051

|-

|-

|2012

|2012

|PG

|PG

|A leopard cub and his mother in India join a gang of animals (a bear, a monkey, and a pet parrot) in their journey to Delhi to make the humans stop destroying their homes. This movie is very environmentalist, examples being the parrot Alex pleading with the humans to "share the world" with the animals, which results in laws of environmentalism being passed and apartment buildings being cancelled.

|A leopard cub and his mother in India join a gang of animals (a bear, a monkey, and a pet parrot) in their journey to Delhi to make the humans stop destroying their homes. This movie is very environmentalist, with examples being the parrot Alex pleading with the humans to "share the world" with the animals, which results in laws of environmentalism being passed and apartment buildings being canceled.

|$3.10 million

|$3.10 million

|-

|-

|2008

|2008

|PG

|PG

|This [[pagan]] film has horrible scenes of violence, war, and mass murder. It performed so horribly at the box office that it was criticized for potentially traumatizing young children and was pulled from theaters after a week. It is currently the lowest-grossing computer animated film of all time.

|This [[pagan]] film has horrible scenes of violence, war, and mass murder. It performed so horribly at the box office that it was criticized for potentially traumatizing young children and was pulled from theaters after a week. It is currently the lowest-grossing computer-animated film of all time.

|$694,782

|$694,782

|-

|-

|2012

|2012

|PG

|PG

|Aside from being considered one of the worst computer animated films, the film vilifies capitalism and leading companies.

|Aside from being considered one of the worst computer-animated films, the film vilifies capitalism and leading companies.

|N/A

|N/A

|-

|-

|2013

|2013

|PG

|PG

|This animated film's main premise is about taking turkey off of the Thanksgiving menu.

|This animated film's main premise is taking turkey off the Thanksgiving menu.

|$55,750,480

|$55,750,480

|-

|-

|2018

|2018

|G

|G

|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him, while the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated in a positive manner. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged under the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic" that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel titled ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'' was released in 2021.

|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged under the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic" that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel titled ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'' was released in 2021.

|$146,983,492

|$146,983,492

|-

|-

|1998

|1998

|G

|G

|This revisionist take on Arthurian legend throws everything that makes the source material great (Christianity, heroism, bravery, etc.) out the window for the sake of advocating feminism and wanting to be as worthy a Disney animated musical film (Its from Warner Bros), only to be panned by critics in the end. Even though it's suppose to a G-rated family comedy, an incest joke appears as well.<ref>https://www.imdb.com/character/ch0100869/quotes</ref>

|This revisionist take on Arthurian legend throws everything that makes the source material great (Christianity, heroism, bravery, etc.) out the window for the sake of advocating feminism and wanting to be as worthy a Disney animated musical film (Its from Warner Bros), only to be panned by critics in the end. Even though it's supposed to be a G-rated family comedy, an incest joke appears as well.<ref>https://www.imdb.com/character/ch0100869/quotes</ref>

|$22,510,798

|$22,510,798

|-

|-

|2004

|2004

|Not Rated

|Not Rated

|The notorious sequel to ''The Legend of the Titanic'' stars the characters of the first movie trying to find the sunken [[RMS Titanic]] only to be taken to the mythical city of Atlantis. This North Korean film paints being held prisoner in a positive light, for the king of Atlantis forces the main characters to stay in Atlantis forever, and Don Juan even willingly submits to being taken prisoner. It also shows disrespect towards the tragedy of the Titanic by referring to the Titanic as "mythical". Family values are even tossed aside where the main characters are more concerned about seeing Atlantis again than their families back home. A sequel TV series was released in 2011 with the same bad values and strange nature.

|The notorious sequel to ''The Legend of the Titanic'' stars the first movie's characters trying to find the sunken [[RMS Titanic]] only to be taken to the mythical city of Atlantis. This North Korean film paints being held prisoner positively, for the king of Atlantis forces the main characters to stay in Atlantis forever. Don Juan willingly submits to being taken prisoner and coerces his companions to do the same. It also shows disrespect towards the tragedy of the Titanic by referring to the Titanic as "mythical." Family values are even tossed aside when the main characters are more concerned about seeing Atlantis again than their families back home. A sequel TV series was released in 2011 with the same bad values and strange nature.

|€4,000,000

|€4,000,000

|-

|-

|1994

|1994

|G

|G

|Considered by many to be Don Bluth's worst film, the movie stars a troll named Stanley exiled from the Land of Trolls and ends up in Central Park, meeting two children. He also ends up being a little ''too'' happy with a little girl kissing him on the cheek. The end of the movie has an environmental message when Stanley causes plants to grow all over the city, potentially causing trouble for people in New York City. Even Don Bluth himself admitted that this was the worst movie he had created, a statement that many directors in the 2020s would never admit with their recent flops.

|Considered by many to be Don Bluth's worst film, the movie stars a troll named Stanley exiled from the Land of Trolls for his love of growing flowers and ends up in Central Park, meeting two children. He also ends up being a little ''too'' happy with a little girl kissing him on the cheek. The end of the movie has an environmental message when Stanley causes plants to grow all over the city, potentially causing trouble for people in New York City. Even Don Bluth admitted that this was the worst movie he had created, a statement many directors in the 2020s would never admit with their recent flops.

|$71,368

|$71,368

|-

|-

|2022

|2022

|PG (should be PG-13)

|PG (should be PG-13)

|The film encourages rebellion against parents and is full of suggestive humor and themes that is unsuitable for children.

|The film encourages rebellion against parents and is full of suggestive humor and unsuitable themes for children.

|$13.4 million

|$13.4 million

|-

|-

|2023

|2023

|PG

|PG

|The film has the hero (Asha) team up with a fallen star to stop the evil King Magnifico from not granting all the wishes that people give him. Furthermore, the film says humans come from stardust, which goes against basic theology.

|The film has the hero (Asha) team up with a fallen star to stop the evil King Magnifico from not granting all the wishes that people give him. While Magnifico is the villain of this film, some viewers felt that he has a point in not granting every single wish; some of those wishes could be used for more nefarious purposes. Furthermore, the film says humans come from stardust, which goes against basic theology.

| N/A (Has yet to be released)

| N/A (Has yet to be released)

|-

|-