Changes

Man oh man! We are really beating Wikipedia up!  

Man oh man! We are really beating Wikipedia up!  

[[Will N.]]

Will N.

*Indeed. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:35, 6 January 2007 (EST)

*Indeed. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 11:35, 6 January 2007 (EST)

==Beating Out Wackypedia==

==Beating Out Wackypedia==

Hey me and Andrew were discussing, if we want to beat out the amount of entries that Wackypedia has, we have to really pick it up and start putting alot of post up. We need approx. 274 for 10 years and we just get to 1,000,100. Thats if they dont put up anymore post. We need to get out to others cause we cant do this by ourselves. If we are going to do this all by ourselves, each of us has to do at least 5 entries a day, that is everyone in the class. Just wanted to alert the community. We need to grow. Thats all folks! [[Will N.]]

Hey me and Andrew were discussing, if we want to beat out the amount of entries that Wackypedia has, we have to really pick it up and start putting alot of post up. We need approx. 274 for 10 years and we just get to 1,000,100. Thats if they dont put up anymore post. We need to get out to others cause we cant do this by ourselves. If we are going to do this all by ourselves, each of us has to do at least 5 entries a day, that is everyone in the class. Just wanted to alert the community. We need to grow. Thats all folks! Will N.

Will, thanks for the encouragement.  More postings are helpful, most of all to the person who is posting the information.  He learns and won't forget that material for a long time.  That said, the vast majority of postings on Wikipedia is silly trivial or worse, lacking in any real value.  I bet 90% of Wikipedia could be removed without hardly anyone even noticing or caring.  --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:50, 19 January 2007 (EST)

Will, thanks for the encouragement.  More postings are helpful, most of all to the person who is posting the information.  He learns and won't forget that material for a long time.  That said, the vast majority of postings on Wikipedia is silly trivial or worse, lacking in any real value.  I bet 90% of Wikipedia could be removed without hardly anyone even noticing or caring.  --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:50, 19 January 2007 (EST)

*I think that our focus should be not on the number of pages, but on the quality of the pages.  The number of possible useful, high quality pages is finite.  We do not need to have a million pages if half of them are going to be controversial or useless.  It is much better to have less pages and maintain our high quality standards. [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 07:53, 20 January 2007 (EST)

*I think that our focus should be not on the number of pages, but on the quality of the pages.  The number of possible useful, high quality pages is finite.  We do not need to have a million pages if half of them are going to be controversial or useless.  It is much better to have less pages and maintain our high quality standards. [[User:SharonS|SharonS]] 07:53, 20 January 2007 (EST)

I agree with you Sharon, but disagree at the same time. We can make higher quality pages (which I have already seen us do), but lets make alot of them. Cant hurt us. It will only make us better. More pages, and higher quality. Thats what we should do. We have alot of pages (considering how long we have been around), but they are of a high quality. We need to keep doing this. On google if u punch in Online Encyclipideia, ours is not in the first 5 pages. We need to get more publicity. This is done by: 1. More terms and higher quality; 2. Sharing it with others. Thats all we can do for now. If there is anything else, add on to the list.        [[Will N.]]

I agree with you Sharon, but disagree at the same time. We can make higher quality pages (which I have already seen us do), but lets make alot of them. Cant hurt us. It will only make us better. More pages, and higher quality. Thats what we should do. We have alot of pages (considering how long we have been around), but they are of a high quality. We need to keep doing this. On google if u punch in Online Encyclipideia, ours is not in the first 5 pages. We need to get more publicity. This is done by: 1. More terms and higher quality; 2. Sharing it with others. Thats all we can do for now. If there is anything else, add on to the list.        Will N.

As a way of placing more information on Conservapedia and encouraging more posting by others, I've just added links to Conservapedia by other websites and posted my [[American History Lecture One]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:29, 20 January 2007 (EST)

As a way of placing more information on Conservapedia and encouraging more posting by others, I've just added links to Conservapedia by other websites and posted my [[American History Lecture One]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:29, 20 January 2007 (EST)