Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 46: Line 46:  
{{quotebox-float|“Why has DA Willis invoked Georgia’s version of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, which is typically applied to mobsters engaged in the familiar rackets of murder, extortion, trafficking in narcotics and stolen goods, gambling, prostitution and so on?...Because there’s a giant hole in her case: the lack of a clear crime to which Trump and his co-defendants can plausibly be said to have agreed...That is what’s so strange about DA Willis’s indictment...She alleges that the 19 people named in her indictment are guilty of conspiracy because they agreed to try to keep Donald Trump in power as president — specifically, to change the outcome of the election in favor of Trump...Trying to change an election outcome is legal; the end doesn’t become illegal if pursued by illegal means — instead, those illegal means can be charged as crimes...But there is no conspiracy unless the objective itself is clearly a crime...An agreement to try to reverse the result of an election is not an agreement to commit a crime”.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/andrew-mccarthy-reveals-giant-hole-fani-williss-case/</ref>}}
 
{{quotebox-float|“Why has DA Willis invoked Georgia’s version of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, which is typically applied to mobsters engaged in the familiar rackets of murder, extortion, trafficking in narcotics and stolen goods, gambling, prostitution and so on?...Because there’s a giant hole in her case: the lack of a clear crime to which Trump and his co-defendants can plausibly be said to have agreed...That is what’s so strange about DA Willis’s indictment...She alleges that the 19 people named in her indictment are guilty of conspiracy because they agreed to try to keep Donald Trump in power as president — specifically, to change the outcome of the election in favor of Trump...Trying to change an election outcome is legal; the end doesn’t become illegal if pursued by illegal means — instead, those illegal means can be charged as crimes...But there is no conspiracy unless the objective itself is clearly a crime...An agreement to try to reverse the result of an election is not an agreement to commit a crime”.<ref>https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/andrew-mccarthy-reveals-giant-hole-fani-williss-case/</ref>}}
 
Big Fani Willis was part of a [[conspiracy]] that questioned the legitimacy of Fulton county's [[2020 presidential election]].<ref>[https://thepoliticalinsider.com/social-media-posts-show-fulton-county-da-fani-willis-questioning-2020-election/ Social Media Posts Show Fulton County DA Fani Willis Questioning 2020 Election], BY RUSTY WEISS, AUGUST 25, 2023. thepoliticalinsider.com</ref><ref>[https://heavy.com/news/fani-willis-politics-democrat/ Fani Willis Politics: She Is a Democrat Who Praised Obama & Harris], By Jessica McBride, Updated Aug 14, 2023. heavy.com</ref>
 
Big Fani Willis was part of a [[conspiracy]] that questioned the legitimacy of Fulton county's [[2020 presidential election]].<ref>[https://thepoliticalinsider.com/social-media-posts-show-fulton-county-da-fani-willis-questioning-2020-election/ Social Media Posts Show Fulton County DA Fani Willis Questioning 2020 Election], BY RUSTY WEISS, AUGUST 25, 2023. thepoliticalinsider.com</ref><ref>[https://heavy.com/news/fani-willis-politics-democrat/ Fani Willis Politics: She Is a Democrat Who Praised Obama & Harris], By Jessica McBride, Updated Aug 14, 2023. heavy.com</ref>
−
 
+
[[File:Big Fani Willis.PNG|left|250px|thumb|Big Fani Willis]]
 
In August 2023 the [[United States House Committee on the Judiciary]] launched an investigation into the prosecutorial misconduct of Willis examining her use of federal funds for a politically motivated prosecution interfering with federal elections and American [[democracy]]. There were 5 questions regarding her abuse of power:
 
In August 2023 the [[United States House Committee on the Judiciary]] launched an investigation into the prosecutorial misconduct of Willis examining her use of federal funds for a politically motivated prosecution interfering with federal elections and American [[democracy]]. There were 5 questions regarding her abuse of power:
 
*four days before the indictment was announced, Willis "launched a new campaign fundraising website that highlighted" her investigation into Trump;
 
*four days before the indictment was announced, Willis "launched a new campaign fundraising website that highlighted" her investigation into Trump;
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,598

edits

Navigation menu