The book notes how political experts are often no more accurate at making political predictions than most people, and in instances where they are wrong, they are rarely held accountable.<ref>[https://archive.ph/saXJ2 Everybody’S an Expert:Putting predictions to the test] by Louis Menand, ''The New Yorker'', 2005</ref> The book analyzed which styles of thinking are more successful in forecasting. APA PsycNet notes that Tetlock shows that there is a "perversely inverse relationship between the best scientific indicators of good judgment and the qualities that the media most prizes in pundits - the single minded determination required to prevail in ideological combat."<ref>[https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-09833-000 Expert political judgement: How good is it? How can we know?], APA PsycNet, American Psychological Association</ref> | The book notes how political experts are often no more accurate at making political predictions than most people, and in instances where they are wrong, they are rarely held accountable.<ref>[https://archive.ph/saXJ2 Everybody’S an Expert:Putting predictions to the test] by Louis Menand, ''The New Yorker'', 2005</ref> The book analyzed which styles of thinking are more successful in forecasting. APA PsycNet notes that Tetlock shows that there is a "perversely inverse relationship between the best scientific indicators of good judgment and the qualities that the media most prizes in pundits - the single minded determination required to prevail in ideological combat."<ref>[https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-09833-000 Expert political judgement: How good is it? How can we know?], APA PsycNet, American Psychological Association</ref> |