Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
link
Line 54: Line 54:     
==Cosmological Natural Selection: ==
 
==Cosmological Natural Selection: ==
This theory riffs off of the multiverse theory except for there being infinite universes, universes are instead born through the creation of black holes. This theory simply put says that each time a black hole is created, a new universe is created on the other side of the singularity of that black hole, and with each time a new universe is created, it has slight variations to the physical constants of the parent universe. It posits this happens exponentially because each universe creates a new universe full of stars that create more black holes, that create more universes, and so on. It also states that only universes where the physical constants work together in such a pristine way as our universe does it creates a sort of “natural selection” for universes that can be born and reproduce.  
+
This theory riffs off of the multiverse theory except for there being infinite universes, universes are instead born through the creation of [[black hole]]s. This theory simply put says that each time a black hole is created, a new universe is created on the other side of the singularity of that black hole, and with each time a new universe is created, it has slight variations to the physical constants of the parent universe. It posits this happens exponentially because each universe creates a new universe full of stars that create more black holes, that create more universes, and so on. It also states that only universes where the physical constants work together in such a pristine way as our universe does it creates a sort of “natural selection” for universes that can be born and reproduce.  
 
Why this theory comes with a very high intellectual price tag is because it hinges on the behaviour of singularities, naturally creating something new. According to the law of entropy this cannot occur because creation does not come from destruction, so when a star is destroyed, there’s no reason whatsoever to believe it creates anything new. Also this theory does not even attempt to explain where the first Universe came into existence and why it had properties capable of producing more black holes.
 
Why this theory comes with a very high intellectual price tag is because it hinges on the behaviour of singularities, naturally creating something new. According to the law of entropy this cannot occur because creation does not come from destruction, so when a star is destroyed, there’s no reason whatsoever to believe it creates anything new. Also this theory does not even attempt to explain where the first Universe came into existence and why it had properties capable of producing more black holes.
  
SkipCaptcha
36

edits

Navigation menu