Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 2:
Line 2: + +
Rightly so, Roberts fears that the country could splinter if Leftists are allowed to block Trump from becoming president again.
A conservative-liberal divide arose on the scope of the ruling. The majority decision, published "per curiam" but probably penned by Chief Justice [[John Roberts]], went further than what was necessary to decide the case. The three [[liberal]] justices squawked about that in a joint opinion, probably written by Justice [[Elena Kagan]], and wanted to leave open the possibility of the federal government disqualifying [[Trump]] from office even if the states cannot exclude him from the ballot.
A conservative-liberal divide arose on the scope of the ruling. The majority decision, published "per curiam" but probably penned by Chief Justice [[John Roberts]], went further than what was necessary to decide the case. The three [[liberal]] justices squawked about that in a joint opinion, probably written by Justice [[Elena Kagan]], and wanted to leave open the possibility of the federal government disqualifying [[Trump]] from office even if the states cannot exclude him from the ballot.
== Fear of Disunity ==
Chief Justice [[John Roberts]], whose vote [[liberals]] need to prevail on any case, has a fear of disunity that guided his decision in this case and perhaps similar future cases. Rightly so, Roberts fears that the country could splinter if [[Leftist]]s are allowed to block Trump from becoming president again.
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]