| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |December 17, 2006 | | |December 17, 2006 |
| − | |[[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary "has many errors and biases."<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Merriam-Webster&oldid=6164</ref> | + | |''Conservapedia'' explained that the [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary "has many errors and biases."<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Merriam-Webster&oldid=6164</ref> |
| | |This dictionary continued to be cited as an authority by courts and the [[liberal media]]. | | |This dictionary continued to be cited as an authority by courts and the [[liberal media]]. |
| | |“Merriam Webster Redefines 'Female' to Include Men Who Say They Are Female.”<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/20/merriam-webster-redefines-female-include-men-female/</ref> | | |“Merriam Webster Redefines 'Female' to Include Men Who Say They Are Female.”<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/07/20/merriam-webster-redefines-female-include-men-female/</ref> |
| Line 15: |
Line 15: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |December 26, 2006 | | |December 26, 2006 |
| − | |The [[Nobel Prize]] "selection process has become political, as it was not given to [[Ronald Reagan]] or [[Pope John Paul II]] or to anyone who criticizes the [[theory of evolution]]. The Nobel Prizes for literature and peace are mostly given to outspoken [[liberal]]s, such as [[Jimmy Carter]]."<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nobel_Prize&oldid=7393</ref> | + | |''Conservapedia'' explained that the [[Nobel Prize]] "selection process has become political, as it was not given to [[Ronald Reagan]] or [[Pope John Paul II]] or to anyone who criticizes the [[theory of evolution]]. The Nobel Prizes for literature and peace are mostly given to outspoken [[liberal]]s, such as [[Jimmy Carter]]."<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nobel_Prize&oldid=7393</ref> |
| | |[[Liberal denial]] insists that the Nobel Prize has integrity, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. | | |[[Liberal denial]] insists that the Nobel Prize has integrity, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. |
| | |Subsequently, the Nobel Peace Prize was absurdly awarded to [[Barack Obama]] despite a lack of any beneficial, meaningful achievement, and even Obama supporters reacted with "shock" and "a belief that the award was premature, a disservice and a potential liability."<ref>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/10/09/a_weighty_prize.html</ref> | | |Subsequently, the Nobel Peace Prize was absurdly awarded to [[Barack Obama]] despite a lack of any beneficial, meaningful achievement, and even Obama supporters reacted with "shock" and "a belief that the award was premature, a disservice and a potential liability."<ref>http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2009/10/09/a_weighty_prize.html</ref> |
| Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |February 18, 2007 | | |February 18, 2007 |
| − | |Explained that [[abortion]] increases the risk of breast cancer.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&oldid=14427</ref> | + | |''Conservapedia'' explained that [[abortion]] increases the risk of breast cancer.<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&oldid=14427</ref> |
| | |Strident, hysterical denials by liberals, who oppose even telling women of the possibility of an increase in risk. | | |Strident, hysterical denials by liberals, who oppose even telling women of the possibility of an increase in risk. |
| | |A study published in 2013 showed more than a six-fold increase of cancer in women who had an abortion.<ref>[http://www.indianjcancer.com/article.asp?issn=0019-509X;year=2013;volume=50;issue=4;spage=316;epage=321;aulast=Bhadoria AS Bhadoria, U Kapil, N Sareen, P Singh, "Reproductive factors and breast cancer: A case-control study in tertiary care hospital of North India," 50 ''Indian Journal of Cancer'' 4, 316-321 (2013)]</ref> In addition, another study showed that the "number of young women being diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer has been slowly but steadily rising over the past 3 decades," beginning a few years after ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'',<ref>https://abcnews.go.com/Health/advanced-breast-cancer-rise-younger-women/story?id=18606955</ref> and a massive research project in China showed a 44% increase in breast cancer from abortion.<ref>https://www.lifenews.com/2013/12/02/bombshell-study-finds-44-increased-breast-cancer-risk-for-women-having-abortions/</ref> | | |A study published in 2013 showed more than a six-fold increase of cancer in women who had an abortion.<ref>[http://www.indianjcancer.com/article.asp?issn=0019-509X;year=2013;volume=50;issue=4;spage=316;epage=321;aulast=Bhadoria AS Bhadoria, U Kapil, N Sareen, P Singh, "Reproductive factors and breast cancer: A case-control study in tertiary care hospital of North India," 50 ''Indian Journal of Cancer'' 4, 316-321 (2013)]</ref> In addition, another study showed that the "number of young women being diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer has been slowly but steadily rising over the past 3 decades," beginning a few years after ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'',<ref>https://abcnews.go.com/Health/advanced-breast-cancer-rise-younger-women/story?id=18606955</ref> and a massive research project in China showed a 44% increase in breast cancer from abortion.<ref>https://www.lifenews.com/2013/12/02/bombshell-study-finds-44-increased-breast-cancer-risk-for-women-having-abortions/</ref> |
| Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |March 15, 2007 | | |March 15, 2007 |
| − | |Observed that [[Bill O'Reilly]] of the [[Fox News Channel]] is not [[conservative]], and cited several key examples.<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_O%27Reilly&direction=next&oldid=37999</ref> | + | |''Conservapedia'' observed that [[Bill O'Reilly]] of the [[Fox News Channel]] is not [[conservative]], and cited several key examples.<ref>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_O%27Reilly&direction=next&oldid=37999</ref> |
| | |[[Liberal media]] continued to pretend that O'Reilly is somehow a leader of the [[conservative movement]]. | | |[[Liberal media]] continued to pretend that O'Reilly is somehow a leader of the [[conservative movement]]. |
| | |O'Reilly endorses the [[liberal]]s' amnesty bill for illegal immigration. (Ultimately he was fired for personal misconduct.) | | |O'Reilly endorses the [[liberal]]s' amnesty bill for illegal immigration. (Ultimately he was fired for personal misconduct.) |