Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,865
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36:
Line 36: − +
→Macron's wife is a possible transexual? Why is this in the article?
::NASA probably has denied the man on the moon landing was a fraud allegation, but that doesn't mean we highlight it in the 2nd section of the [[Apollo 11]] Conservapedia article. Oh well, some people double down on their craziness because the loathe admitting that they are wrong about matters.
::NASA probably has denied the man on the moon landing was a fraud allegation, but that doesn't mean we highlight it in the 2nd section of the [[Apollo 11]] Conservapedia article. Oh well, some people double down on their craziness because the loathe admitting that they are wrong about matters.
::Unfortunately, I don't expect the Emmanuel Macron to hit the 1,000,000 a page view benchmark. It's not even close the 100,000 page view benchmark. The leading section is terrible because it doesn't follow the principle of an article building a case. For example, it engages in hyper-partisan language that is not even accurate in places (Macron is fascist, etc.). What this does is prevent the people who are persuadable from diving deeper into the article. So you are merely preaching to the choir which is a pretty lame and pointless exercise. I would suggest dumping your frequent all-or-nothing thinking which makes it more likely that you engage in demonization. So many of your articles do this. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:49, March 16, 2024 (EDT)
::Unfortunately, I don't expect the Emmanuel Macron to hit the 1,000,000 a page view benchmark. It's not even close the 100,000 page view benchmark. The leading section is terrible because it doesn't follow the principle of an article building a case. For example, it engages in hyper-partisan language that is not even accurate in places (Macron is fascist, etc. France was taken over by fascist Germany in WWII and now they have a fascist president?). What this does is prevent the people who are persuadable from diving deeper into the article. So you are merely preaching to the choir which is a pretty lame and pointless exercise. I would suggest dumping your frequent all-or-nothing thinking which makes it more likely that you engage in demonization. So many of your articles do this. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:49, March 16, 2024 (EDT)