Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,076
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 47:
Line 47: − − [[NATO]]/Ukraine's first mistake was recruiting people who weren’t ready to fight to the death at the scene of the attack. This led to the culprits being captured and spilling the beans about how they were recruited in exchange for [[money]], whereas ISIS-K fighters always expect to die as “martyrs”. − − The second mistake was that the GUR didn’t tell their [[proxy|proxies]] to flee to a safe house right after the attack to meet a contact that’ll then help them reach the border later on but who’d actually kill them once they meet in order to cover everything up. This led to the terrorists racing towards the Ukrainian border, thus showing everyone that they’d find sanctuary there, which made Russia’s claim of Ukrainian involvement believable for skeptical [[Western civilization|Westerners]]. − − And third, the last mistake was that the GUR used an outdated news template to claim credit for the attack on behalf of ISIS-K, who they correctly predicted would opportunistically run with it for clout. By doing so, however, they signaled that the group itself didn’t play a role in organizing what happened otherwise their more modern template would have been used instead. Taken together, these three sloppy mistakes discredited the [[Mainstream Media]]'s narrative and drew attention to the GUR instead.
→Western propaganda war
The [[fake news|NATO/CIA propaganda apparatus]] kicked into overdrive, with the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' claiming ''In The Conflict Between The West And Authoritarian Foes, Islamic State Sees All Sides As Targets'', the ''[[New York Times]]'' claiming ''ISIS-K, Group Tied To Moscow Attack, Has Grown Bolder And More Violent'' and the ''[[Washington Post]]'' stating ''What To Know About Islamic State Group, Which Claimed The Moscow Attack'' to insure maximum [[brainwashing]] before any investigation was completed.
The [[fake news|NATO/CIA propaganda apparatus]] kicked into overdrive, with the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' claiming ''In The Conflict Between The West And Authoritarian Foes, Islamic State Sees All Sides As Targets'', the ''[[New York Times]]'' claiming ''ISIS-K, Group Tied To Moscow Attack, Has Grown Bolder And More Violent'' and the ''[[Washington Post]]'' stating ''What To Know About Islamic State Group, Which Claimed The Moscow Attack'' to insure maximum [[brainwashing]] before any investigation was completed.
Coupled with its terrorist history and ties with radical Islamic groups, which respectively prove that it has the capabilities and intent to carry out the Crocus attack as well as the knowledge required to impersonate [[extremist]]s online for recruiting purposes, all of this made the GUR the prime suspect. It learned everything about terrorism from the CIA, but since it’s still a knockoff, it made a series of sloppy mistakes that resulted in incriminating Ukraine instead of lending false credence to the ISIS-K narrative.
Coupled with its terrorist history and ties with radical Islamic groups, which respectively prove that it has the capabilities and intent to carry out the Crocus attack as well as the knowledge required to impersonate [[extremist]]s online for recruiting purposes, all of this made the GUR the prime suspect. It learned everything about terrorism from the CIA, but since it’s still a knockoff, it made a series of sloppy mistakes that resulted in incriminating Ukraine instead of lending false credence to the ISIS-K narrative.