Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:  
:So you are agreeing that evolution per se is not falsifiable?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:43, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
 
:So you are agreeing that evolution per se is not falsifiable?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:43, 21 June 2007 (EDT)
 
::With apologies to Mr. Rayment, I must take issue with Angst's claim that "The Bible claims to be inerrant."  It makes no such claim.  And even if it did claim to be inerrant, finding an error would only disprove the individual proposition of inerrancy -- it would not prove that everything in the Bible is wrong.  [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]]
 
::With apologies to Mr. Rayment, I must take issue with Angst's claim that "The Bible claims to be inerrant."  It makes no such claim.  And even if it did claim to be inerrant, finding an error would only disprove the individual proposition of inerrancy -- it would not prove that everything in the Bible is wrong.  [[User:Ungtss|Ungtss]]
 +
:::Correction accepted. The Bible makes no claim to be inerrant.  Instead, others make this claim of the Bible.  Similarly, finding an error in the theory of evolution would only disprove the individual proposition -- it would not disprove evolutionary theory in it's entirety. [[User:PerpetualAngst|PerpetualAngst]]
 +
::The Theory of Evolution is still falsifiable.  Tens of thousands of papers and supporting theories would need to be refuted before one could claim the larger evolutionary theory has been refuted.[[User:PerpetualAngst|PerpetualAngst]]

Navigation menu