Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
295,508
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 76:
Line 76: + + + + + + +
→Review
:What the liberals on the Supreme Court did with Obergefell v. Hodges went against federal and state laws and violated the Constitution, and they also did not have the power or the authority to change those laws or to legislate from the bench, which makes what they did illegal. So, in other words - nope, not gonna happen. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 22:05, 26 May 2020 (EDT)
:What the liberals on the Supreme Court did with Obergefell v. Hodges went against federal and state laws and violated the Constitution, and they also did not have the power or the authority to change those laws or to legislate from the bench, which makes what they did illegal. So, in other words - nope, not gonna happen. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 22:05, 26 May 2020 (EDT)
==Review==
This guy [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWcWxsxOfxo&t=823s with 391,000 YouTube followers] recently did a review of Conservapedia. He didn't review any of my articles, but it's interesting what he says about others. He found several dead links on this page.
He criticizes "being rude just to hurt people", for example in the Atheism and obesity article.
Not everyone has heard of Conservapedia, for example people in their 20s. That YouTube video apparently is an introduction for them. So evidently "being rude just to hurt" people isn't just a problem on CP talk pages. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 03:06, April 18, 2024 (EDT)