Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: − +
→Controversy
==Controversy==
==Controversy==
As Paul is seen as specifically providing a formal treatise on the actual means of salvation, not by the merit of our works but by "the gift of righteousness" (Rm. 5:17), it is often seen to be in tension (most particularly) with James 2, and has been abused by some as to mean that works are not necessary as an evidential outworking of saving faith, giving birth to ''[[antinomianism]]''.
As Paul is seen as specifically providing a formal treatise on the actual means of [[salvation]], not by the merit of our works but by "the gift of righteousness" (Rm. 5:17), it is often seen to be in tension (most particularly) with James 2, and has been abused by some as to mean that works are not necessary as an evidential outworking of saving faith, giving birth to ''[[antinomianism]]''.
Romans 9 through 11 deals with [[predestination]], the basis for which is the cause of disagreement between [[Arminianism]] and [[Calvinism]].
Romans 9 through 11 deals with [[predestination]], the basis for which is the cause of disagreement between [[Arminianism]] and [[Calvinism]].