Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,100
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 81:
Line 81: − − ==Intelligent Design: == − This theory simply put says that the existence of the universe is evidence of an intelligent creator. Something that is capable of calculating every physical constant to be able to work together in such a pristine way that it's capable of supporting the existence of everything we can see and not see. − This theory, as far fetched as some may think, is the most likely and most capable theory we have. It explains why every physical constant is so perfectly in tune with all of the other constants and provides such an existence. Some critique this theory because of the lack of empirical evidence, it's philosophical and theological nature, and the scientific proclivity that generally supports theories that are based on natural laws and observable phenomena. In contrast, this is the only theory that satisfies all of the observable and natural laws, including but not limited to the law of entropy and the unfathomably low probability of something like our universe to exist the way that it does.
→Intelligent Design:
This principle simply put says that the universe is not specifically fine tuned to support life, but life naturally would find a way to adapt to however the physical structure of the universe is made up.
This principle simply put says that the universe is not specifically fine tuned to support life, but life naturally would find a way to adapt to however the physical structure of the universe is made up.
The problem with this theory in the fact that it is almost dismissive of the fact that we got one universe (that's still yet to be explained how it was created to begin with), was created with physical constants that just so happen to work so well together that it has the capability to support not only the existence of matter, space, time, etc., but also something as fragile as life. There's absolutely no reason whatsoever to think with all the infinite possibilities of how the universe could’ve been constructed, it would’ve randomly constructed itself in such a way that could not only allow the existence of anything let alone everything, tangible or otherwise. According to our observable law of entropy, if any one or multitude of the physical constants were changed, it would be far more likely that the universe wouldn't be able to sustain any sort of creation in it whatsoever, let alone life which is extremely fragile by nature. According to the law of entropy, it's unfathomably more likely that if the universes constants were “random” atoms, space, time, everything, wouldn't be possible to even exist.
The problem with this theory in the fact that it is almost dismissive of the fact that we got one universe (that's still yet to be explained how it was created to begin with), was created with physical constants that just so happen to work so well together that it has the capability to support not only the existence of matter, space, time, etc., but also something as fragile as life. There's absolutely no reason whatsoever to think with all the infinite possibilities of how the universe could’ve been constructed, it would’ve randomly constructed itself in such a way that could not only allow the existence of anything let alone everything, tangible or otherwise. According to our observable law of entropy, if any one or multitude of the physical constants were changed, it would be far more likely that the universe wouldn't be able to sustain any sort of creation in it whatsoever, let alone life which is extremely fragile by nature. According to the law of entropy, it's unfathomably more likely that if the universes constants were “random” atoms, space, time, everything, wouldn't be possible to even exist.
==Theistic Implications==
==Theistic Implications==