SkipCaptcha
4,063
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: +
→Eeks of Liberal Bias
:::How about this: put in both sides of the story without slanting one direction or the other. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 02:10, March 21, 2024 (EDT)
:::How about this: put in both sides of the story without slanting one direction or the other. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''Zelensky didn't kill himself'']]</sup> 02:10, March 21, 2024 (EDT)
::::Mr. Nationalist, reverted as per the request of someone. Also, your "better wording" false claim (you substantially changed the content) is a sign to me that the person who told me to revert made a valid request of me. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:39, May 21, 2024 (EDT)
::::Mr. Nationalist, reverted as per the request of someone. Also, your "better wording" false claim (you substantially changed the content) is a sign to me that the person who told me to revert made a valid request of me. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:39, May 21, 2024 (EDT)
You misunderstood the "better wording" edit. I called it that because I removed the words "According to" in one sentence because the next sentence started with "According to" as well. I thought it would be poor writing/phrasing to have two straight sentences start with the phrase "According to". Hence, I added the note "better wording" to my edit, as wording simply has to do with phrasing and not point of view. As for changing the content, I noticed that somebody had said the article had seemed to have been written from a liberal point of view (check the categories) and added a banner at the top of the page. I also saw this on the talk page as well. I decided to do some research and change the article to maintain a better point of view due to the request. My goal was not to leave the article openly reflecting the views of any side in the case of Leo Frank one way or the other. I only added a writing by Emory University Professor Don Livingston and said that he thought Frank was guilty. -[[User:Mr. Nationalist|Mr. Nationalist]] ([[User talk:Mr. Nationalist|talk]]) 00:18, May 22, 2024 (EDT)
:::::The job of an Admin is to seek compromise and neutral language, not to weigh in wholesale as a stooge for one party or the other on a subject the Admin has no interest or understanding of. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 00:02, May 22, 2024 (EDT)
:::::The job of an Admin is to seek compromise and neutral language, not to weigh in wholesale as a stooge for one party or the other on a subject the Admin has no interest or understanding of. Thank you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]<sup>[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]</sup> 00:02, May 22, 2024 (EDT)