Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes added ,  20:23, May 23, 2024
m
Line 14: Line 14:  
Strzok interviewed [[Cheryl Mills]] on April 9, 2016. Mills was granted immunity, nevertheless Mills lied to Strzok anyway and was not prosecuted. “Mills did not learn Clinton was using a private server until after Clinton’s [Department of State] tenure...Mills stated she was not even sure she knew what a server was at the time," Strzok reported. Mills asked about it in a Feb. 27, 2010 email to Abedin and an aide to [[Bill Clinton]] who helped set up the Clinton Chappaqua server. “Ur funny. We are on the same server,” Cooper replied.
 
Strzok interviewed [[Cheryl Mills]] on April 9, 2016. Mills was granted immunity, nevertheless Mills lied to Strzok anyway and was not prosecuted. “Mills did not learn Clinton was using a private server until after Clinton’s [Department of State] tenure...Mills stated she was not even sure she knew what a server was at the time," Strzok reported. Mills asked about it in a Feb. 27, 2010 email to Abedin and an aide to [[Bill Clinton]] who helped set up the Clinton Chappaqua server. “Ur funny. We are on the same server,” Cooper replied.
   −
The next day [[President Obama]] intervened in the ongoing [[criminal]] investigation when he publicly declared that Hillary Clinton showed “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information.<ref>https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/10/obama-says-hillary-clinton-emails-did-not-endanger/ </ref><ref><small>"in April, 2016, President Obama gave an interview in which he seemed to have foreknowledge that Hillary Clinton would be exonerated for her “carelessness” and did not “intentionally” mishandle classified emails, words that Comey would use just a few months later...In an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” Mr. Obama seemed to prejudge the outcome of the ongoing inquiry into Mrs. Clinton’s email scandal, and he disputed the notion that any of the emails contained classified information of true importance. "She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy,” he said. “What I also know is that there’s classified and then there’s classified. There’s stuff that is really top secret top secret, and then there’s stuff that is being presented to the president, the secretary of state, you may not want going out over the wire.”…<br>...we now see how Obama’s pledge that politics would not taint the investigation was a bald-faced lie. This confidence in her exoneration was shared by Mrs. Clinton, who also seemed to have foreknowledge that the fix was in: The FBI is investigating the matter, and while Mrs. Clinton has virtually promised she will not be indicted, the scandal still hangs over her presidential ambitions...“That is not going to happen,” she told NBC News when asked if she would be indicted. “There is not even the remotest chance that it’s going to happen.”<br>''[[National Review]]'' Contributing Editor Andrew McCarthy has long argued that Obama was the ringleader in obstructing justice in the Hillary email investigation: "From the first, these columns have argued that the whitewash of the Hillary Clinton-emails caper was President Barack Obama’s call -- not the FBI’s, and not the [[Justice Department]]’s… The decision was inevitable. Obama, using a pseudonymous email account, had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account....If Clinton had been charged, Obama’s culpable involvement would have been patent. In any prosecution of Clinton, the Clinton -- Obama emails would have been in the spotlight. For the prosecution, they would be more proof of willful (or, if you prefer, grossly negligent) mishandling of intelligence. More significantly, for Clinton’s defense, they would show that Obama was complicit in Clinton’s conduct yet faced no criminal charges."<br>...a draft dated June 30, 2016 (i.e., five days before Comey delivered the final version), contained a passage expressly referring to a troublesome email exchange between Clinton and Obama. (I note that the FBI’s report of its eventual interview of Clinton contains a cryptic reference to a July 1, 2012, email that Clinton sent from Russia to Obama’s email address. See report, page 2.) The passage in the June 30 draft stated: ''We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries. That use included an email exchange with the President while Secretary Clinton was on the territory of such an adversary. [Emphasis added.] Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account.''<br>On the same day, according to a Strzok–Page text, a revised draft of Comey’s remarks was circulated by his chief of staff, [[Jim Rybicki]]. It replaced “the President” with “another senior government official.” So not only were edits made to Comey’s draft memo to hide Hillary’s guilt but also Obama’s involvement.<br>From the Strzok-Page text messages we know that Loretta Lynch knew Hillary would not be prosecuted. That meeting on the tarmac was to tell Bill Clinton the fix was in, a fix whose impetus came from the [[White House]] and an occupant concerned with both his legacy being erased by a President Trump but also by his involvement in covering up Hillary’s crimes....<br>This is [[Watergate]] on steroids. Not only do we have one party colluding with government agencies to keep its candidate from being prosecuted for her [[crime]]s and preventing the election of the other party’s candidate, but we also have a sitting and corrupt President using the powers of his office to subvert an election and hand-pick his successor.<br></small>[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/01/obama__leader_of_the_deep_state_coup.html#.WnCBy6djFw9.facebook]</ref> Strzok texted [[Lisa Page]], his cohort and an FBI lawyer that he was “increasingly profoundly bothered by [ [[FBI General Counsel James Baker]] ] call and the lack of ANY heads up. Deeply. It was wrong given what I had already been asked to do...I’m not sure if I want to be part of this.” Lisa Page responded, “You are part of this and that’s not going to change. But I think you have every right to be angry and frustrated about being left out of the loop on your investigation, especially when you’re going to be left holding the bag. . . . Big big case, big big problems.” Sen. [[Chuck Grassley]] noted 17 witnesses, including Clinton herself, were interviewed after the decision not to prosecute Clinton was made.<ref>May 4, 2016 Lisa Page and Strzok discuss Trump sealing the GOP nomination:
+
The next day [[President Obama]] intervened in the ongoing [[criminal]] investigation when he publicly declared that Hillary Clinton showed “carelessness” in using a private e-mail server to handle classified information.<ref>https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/10/obama-says-hillary-clinton-emails-did-not-endanger/ </ref><ref><small>"in April, 2016, President Obama gave an interview in which he seemed to have foreknowledge that Hillary Clinton would be exonerated for her “carelessness” and did not “intentionally” mishandle classified emails, words that Comey would use just a few months later...In an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” Mr. Obama seemed to prejudge the outcome of the ongoing inquiry into Mrs. Clinton’s email scandal, and he disputed the notion that any of the emails contained classified information of true importance. "She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy,” he said. “What I also know is that there’s classified and then there’s classified. There’s stuff that is really top secret top secret, and then there’s stuff that is being presented to the president, the secretary of state, you may not want going out over the wire.”…<br>...we now see how Obama’s pledge that politics would not taint the investigation was a bald-faced lie. This confidence in her exoneration was shared by Mrs. Clinton, who also seemed to have foreknowledge that the fix was in: The FBI is investigating the matter, and while Mrs. Clinton has virtually promised she will not be indicted, the scandal still hangs over her presidential ambitions...“That is not going to happen,” she told NBC News when asked if she would be indicted. “There is not even the remotest chance that it’s going to happen.”<br>''[[National Review]]'' Contributing Editor [[Andrew McCarthy]] has long argued that Obama was the ringleader in obstructing justice in the Hillary email investigation: "From the first, these columns have argued that the whitewash of the Hillary Clinton-emails caper was President Barack Obama’s call -- not the FBI’s, and not the [[Justice Department]]’s… The decision was inevitable. Obama, using a pseudonymous email account, had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account....If Clinton had been charged, Obama’s culpable involvement would have been patent. In any prosecution of Clinton, the Clinton -- Obama emails would have been in the spotlight. For the prosecution, they would be more proof of willful (or, if you prefer, grossly negligent) mishandling of intelligence. More significantly, for Clinton’s defense, they would show that Obama was complicit in Clinton’s conduct yet faced no criminal charges."<br>...a draft dated June 30, 2016 (i.e., five days before Comey delivered the final version), contained a passage expressly referring to a troublesome email exchange between Clinton and Obama. (I note that the FBI’s report of its eventual interview of Clinton contains a cryptic reference to a July 1, 2012, email that Clinton sent from Russia to Obama’s email address. See report, page 2.) The passage in the June 30 draft stated: ''We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries. That use included an email exchange with the President while Secretary Clinton was on the territory of such an adversary. [Emphasis added.] Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account.''<br>On the same day, according to a Strzok–Page text, a revised draft of Comey’s remarks was circulated by his chief of staff, [[Jim Rybicki]]. It replaced “the President” with “another senior government official.” So not only were edits made to Comey’s draft memo to hide Hillary’s guilt but also Obama’s involvement.<br>From the Strzok-Page text messages we know that Loretta Lynch knew Hillary would not be prosecuted. That meeting on the tarmac was to tell Bill Clinton the fix was in, a fix whose impetus came from the [[White House]] and an occupant concerned with both his legacy being erased by a President Trump but also by his involvement in covering up Hillary’s crimes....<br>This is [[Watergate]] on steroids. Not only do we have one party colluding with government agencies to keep its candidate from being prosecuted for her [[crime]]s and preventing the election of the other party’s candidate, but we also have a sitting and corrupt President using the powers of his office to subvert an election and hand-pick his successor.<br></small>[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/01/obama__leader_of_the_deep_state_coup.html#.WnCBy6djFw9.facebook]</ref> Strzok texted [[Lisa Page]], his cohort and an FBI lawyer that he was “increasingly profoundly bothered by [ [[FBI General Counsel James Baker]] ] call and the lack of ANY heads up. Deeply. It was wrong given what I had already been asked to do...I’m not sure if I want to be part of this.” Lisa Page responded, “You are part of this and that’s not going to change. But I think you have every right to be angry and frustrated about being left out of the loop on your investigation, especially when you’re going to be left holding the bag. . . . Big big case, big big problems.” Sen. [[Chuck Grassley]] noted 17 witnesses, including Clinton herself, were interviewed after the decision not to prosecute Clinton was made.<ref>May 4, 2016 Lisa Page and Strzok discuss Trump sealing the GOP nomination:
 
{{Quotebox|Page – And holy sh*t [[Ted Cruz|Cruz]] just dropped out of the race. It’s going to be a Clinton Trump race. Unbelievable.<br>Strzok – What?!?!??<br>Page – You heard that right my friend<br>Strzok – I saw Trump won, figured it would be a bit<br>Strzok - Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE [Mid Year Exam - codename for the Clinton investigation] ….<br>Page - It sure does. We need to talk about follow up call tomorrow. We still never have.}} https://dailycaller.com/2018/01/21/fbi-agents-felt-pressure-wrap-up-clinton-email-probe-trump/</ref>
 
{{Quotebox|Page – And holy sh*t [[Ted Cruz|Cruz]] just dropped out of the race. It’s going to be a Clinton Trump race. Unbelievable.<br>Strzok – What?!?!??<br>Page – You heard that right my friend<br>Strzok – I saw Trump won, figured it would be a bit<br>Strzok - Now the pressure really starts to finish MYE [Mid Year Exam - codename for the Clinton investigation] ….<br>Page - It sure does. We need to talk about follow up call tomorrow. We still never have.}} https://dailycaller.com/2018/01/21/fbi-agents-felt-pressure-wrap-up-clinton-email-probe-trump/</ref>
  
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,467

edits

Navigation menu