Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,884
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
→FISA abuse
Former and [[NBC News]] "expert" [[Shawn Henry]] admitted under oath he had no evidence of Russia hacking the [[DNC]], despite having originated the [[fake news]].
Former and [[NBC News]] "expert" [[Shawn Henry]] admitted under oath he had no evidence of Russia hacking the [[DNC]], despite having originated the [[fake news]].
===Russiagate===
{{See also|Russiagate}}
In April, 2016, [[Barack Obama]] gave an interview in which he seemed to have foreknowledge that [[Hillary Clinton]] would be exonerated for her “carelessness” and did not “intentionally” mishandle classified [[email]]s, words that FBI director [[Jimmy "the Weasel" Comey]] would use just a few months later. In an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” Mr. Obama seemed to prejudge the outcome of the ongoing inquiry into Mrs. Clinton’s email scandal, and he disputed the notion that any of the emails contained classified information of true importance. "She would never intentionally put America in any kind of jeopardy,” he said. “What I also know is that there’s classified and then there’s classified. There’s stuff that is really top secret top secret, and then there’s stuff that is being presented to the president, the secretary of state, you may not want going out over the wire.”…...we now see how Obama’s pledge that politics would not taint the investigation was a bald-faced lie. This confidence in her exoneration was shared by Mrs. Clinton, who also seemed to have foreknowledge that the fix was in: The FBI is investigating the matter, and while Mrs. Clinton has virtually promised she will not be indicted, the scandal still hangs over her presidential ambitions...“That is not going to happen,” she told NBC News when asked if she would be indicted. “There is not even the remotest chance that it’s going to happen.”<ref>Barack Obama intervened into the [[Hillary Clinton email investigation]] when he publicly stated that [[Hillary Clinton]] showed “carelessness” in using a private [[e-mail]] server. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/10/obama-says-hillary-clinton-emails-did-not-endanger/ </ref>
Andrew McCarthy long argued that Obama was the ringleader in obstructing justice in the [[Hillary email investigation]]: "From the first, these columns have argued that the whitewash of the Hillary Clinton-emails caper was President Barack Obama’s call -- not the FBI’s, and not the [[Justice Department]]’s… The decision was inevitable. Obama, using a pseudonymous email account, had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account....If Clinton had been charged, Obama’s culpable involvement would have been patent. In any prosecution of Clinton, the Clinton -- Obama emails would have been in the spotlight. For the prosecution, they would be more proof of willful (or, if you prefer, grossly negligent) mishandling of intelligence. More significantly, for Clinton’s defense, they would show that Obama was complicit in Clinton’s conduct yet faced no criminal charges."
A draft dated June 30, 2016 (i.e., five days before Comey delivered the final version), contained a passage expressly referring to a troublesome email exchange between Clinton and Obama. (The [[FBI]]’s report of its eventual interview of Clinton contains a cryptic reference to a July 1, 2012, email that Clinton sent from [[Russia]] to Obama’s email address. See report, page 2.) The passage in the June 30 draft stated: ''We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including from the territory of sophisticated adversaries. That use included an email exchange with the President while Secretary Clinton was on the territory of such an adversary. [Emphasis added.] Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account.''
On the same day, according to a [[Strzok]]–[[Lisa Page|Page]] text, a revised draft of Comey’s remarks was circulated by Comey's [[chief of staff]], [[Jim Rybicki]]. It replaced “the President” with “another senior government official.” So not only were edits made to Comey’s draft memo to hide Hillary’s guilt but also Obama’s involvement.
From the Strzok-Page text messages it was apparent that [[Loretta Lynch]] knew Hillary would not be prosecuted. That meeting on the tarmac was to tell [[Bill Clinton]] the fix was in, a fix whose impetus came from the [[White House]] and an occupant concerned with both his legacy being erased by a President Trump but also by his involvement in covering up Hillary’s [[crime]]s.
This was [[Watergate]] on steroids. Not only do we have one party colluding with government agencies to keep its candidate from being prosecuted for her [[crime]]s and preventing the election of the other party’s candidate, but we also have a sitting and [[corrupt]] President using the powers of his office to [[subvert]] an [[election]] and hand-pick his successor.<ref>[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/01/obama__leader_of_the_deep_state_coup.html#.WnCBy6djFw9.facebook Obama -- Leader of the Deep State Coup], By Daniel John Sobieski, ''American Thinker'', January 27, 2018.</ref> Strzok struck Comey's original finding, "grossly negligent", and inserted Obama's "extremely careless."
===Michael Sussmann trial===
===Michael Sussmann trial===