Changes

MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press. <ref>[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003</ref>  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [["Sensitive Security Information"]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.

MacLean was rebuffed by his FAMS managers and the [[Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General]], so he warned the public by going to the press. <ref>[http://onoekeh.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_archive.html Air Marshals Pulled from 'Key Flights'], Brock Meeks, ''NBC News (MSNBC)'', August 29, 2003</ref>  The message he disclosed was not labeled as [["Sensitive Security Information"]] (SSI), the often abused information control label within DHS' [[Transportation Security Administration]] (TSA) used to protect information--unaware of any obligation to protect the information.  For employees dealing with traditional classified information, which is typically much more sensitive that SSI, they must be made aware of its status so as to protect it accordingly.

MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. <ref>[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006</ref>  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. <ref>[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&& Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003</ref>  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, "Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved."<ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003</ref>

MacLean's disclosure helped to draw public scrutiny and congressional outrage to TSA's ill-conceived plan which rapidly led to them reversing their plan. <ref>[http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20061029-115609-8718r Ex-air marshal to sue over 'SSI' label], Audrey Hudson, ''The Washington Times'', October 30, 2006</ref>  TSA first denied that air marshals would have been shifted, but the morning after MacLean's disclosure, Senators [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Barbara Boxer]], and [[Charles Schumer]] held press conferences condemning the plan forcing the TSA to backpedal. <ref>[http://clinton.senate.gov/news/statements/details.cfm?id=235267&& Senator Clinton Reiterates Call on TSA to Justify Security Cuts at Nation’s Airports], Senator Hillary Clinton, ''Official Site of the U.S. Senate'', July 30, 2003</ref>  Later that day the TSA acknowledged that schedules had been changed and their spokesman, Robert Johnson, stated in a press conference, ''"Those actions were premature and a mistake by the people who were involved."''<ref>[http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2003/07/31-air-marshals.htm Air marshals back to long flights], Mimi Hall and Fred Bayles, ''USA Today'', August 1, 2003</ref>

 

 

During a July 30, 2003 White House press conference, President [[George W. Bush]] was prompted for his reaction to the July 26, 2003 DHS Advisory concerning the al-Qaeda threat of suicide hijacks during the summer of 2003.  President Bush stated, ''"The threat is a real threat...we obviously don't have specific data...al-Qaeda tends to use the methodologies that worked in the past...we're focusing on the airline industry right now and we've got reason to do so."'' <ref>[http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-newsconference.v.html], President George W. Bush, ''White House Official Website'', July 30, 2003</ref>

On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. <ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007</ref>  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. <ref>[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006</ref>  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. <ref>[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005</ref>  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as "sensitive" to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. <ref>[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007</ref>

On [[August 31]], [[2006]], a year after proposing to terminate MacLean, the TSA asserted that the July 2003 information he disclosed was SSI. <ref>[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/10/ap/government/main2787504.shtml U.S. Labels 2003 Leaked Memo 'Sensitive'], Larry Margasak, ''Associated Press'', May 10, 2007</ref>  TSA labeled MacLean's disclosure as SSI over three years after it was made public. <ref>[http://www.pogo.org/m/hsp/MacLeanFinalOrderSSI.pdf TSA's August 31, 2006 Final Order on Sensitive Security Information], Andrew Colsky, ''Transportation Security Administration'', August 31, 2006</ref>  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the DHS for failing to have clear policies and oversight of its SSI designations, and using vague standards for its use. <ref>[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05677.pdf Clear Policies and Oversight Needed for Designation of Sensitive Security Information], Steven J. Pecinovsky, ''Government Accountability Office'', June 1, 2005</ref>  If DHS and the [[Department of Justice]] (DOJ) succeed with their removal of MacLean, these pseudo-classification markings will be abused to retroactively mark information as "sensitive" to then retaliate against whistleblowers, possibly decreasing the flow of critical information to the public. <ref>[http://pogo.org/p/government/rmaclean-dhs.html Retroactive Labeling in Robert MacLean v. Department of Homeland Security], Nick Schwellenbach, ''Project On Government Oversight'', May 5, 2007</ref>