| Line 271: |
Line 271: |
| | |1980 | | |1980 |
| | |R | | |R |
| − | |This notorious box office bomb comes from Marxist filmmaker Michael Cimino portrays America as the villain in the Johnson County War, has an anti-capitalist rhetoric, and features a pro-illegal immigration message. Furthermore, it glamorizes [[sexual immorality|prostitution and adultery]]. | + | |Despite the Christian sounding name. This notorious box office bomb comes from Marxist filmmaker Michael Cimino portrays America as the villain in the Johnson County War, has an anti-capitalist rhetoric, and features a pro-illegal immigration message. Furthermore, it glamorizes [[sexual immorality|prostitution and adultery]]. |
| | | | | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 303: |
Line 303: |
| | |$70,405,498 | | |$70,405,498 |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | |John Q | + | |''John Q'' |
| | |2002 | | |2002 |
| | |PG-13 | | |PG-13 |
| Line 1,133: |
Line 1,133: |
| | |This final entry in the ''Indiana Jones'' movie series is also a major slap in the series' face, putting down Indiana Jones himself in favor of his goddaughter. Said goddaughter also justifies stealing an artifact that Indiana has taken by claiming "It's called capitalism". When Indiana mentions bravely fighting the Nazis, she disrespectfully attacks him for "occupying stolen land" from Native Americans, despite the two subjects are totally unrelated. | | |This final entry in the ''Indiana Jones'' movie series is also a major slap in the series' face, putting down Indiana Jones himself in favor of his goddaughter. Said goddaughter also justifies stealing an artifact that Indiana has taken by claiming "It's called capitalism". When Indiana mentions bravely fighting the Nazis, she disrespectfully attacks him for "occupying stolen land" from Native Americans, despite the two subjects are totally unrelated. |
| | |$ | | |$ |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |''It's Pat'' |
| | + | |1994 |
| | + | |PG-13 |
| | + | |Gender confused movie about the titular character. The film tanked in the box office |
| | + | |$60,822 |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |''[[Jackass]]: The Movie'' | | |''[[Jackass]]: The Movie'' |
| Line 1,244: |
Line 1,250: |
| | |2014 | | |2014 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |Apparently represents the idea of revising the ''Sleeping Beauty'' story to focus on a lesbian relationship; although Aurora clearly loves Maleficent as a mother figure, Maleficent takes over the role of the prince and is revealed to be the person whose kiss of "true love" (given on the forehead) really saved Aurora. Revisionist piece which unabashedly promotes the feminist agenda to the extent that most of the males are either villains or useless, even going so far as to heavily hint at a transgender philosophy; promotes hard-core environmentalism, moral relativism and even Marxism; pretty much ruins the morality tale for ''Sleeping Beauty''. ''The Federalist'' also had a field day with the film stating how it promoted the leftist agenda and citing point by point its agenda.<ref>https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/06/maleficent-once-upon-a-screed/</ref> In particular, King Stefan, far from being depicted as a good father who gave up Aurora to the three fairies to protect her from the curse, was shown to not care for Aurora at all and was willing to let her die from the curse. | + | |Apparently represents the idea of revising the ''Sleeping Beauty'' story to focus on a lesbian relationship; although Aurora clearly loves Maleficent as a mother figure, Maleficent takes over the role of the prince and is revealed to be the person whose kiss of "true love" (given on the forehead) really saved Aurora. Revisionist piece which unabashedly promotes the feminist agenda to the extent that most of the males are either villains or useless, even going so far as to heavily hint at a transgender philosophy; promotes hard-core environmentalism, [[moral relativism]] and even Marxism; pretty much ruins the morality tale for ''Sleeping Beauty''. ''The Federalist'' also had a field day with the film stating how it promoted the leftist agenda and citing point by point its agenda.<ref>https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/06/maleficent-once-upon-a-screed/</ref> In particular, King Stefan, far from being depicted as a good father who gave up Aurora to the three fairies to protect her from the curse, was shown to not care for Aurora at all and was willing to let her die from the curse. |
| | |$241,410,378 | | |$241,410,378 |
| | |- | | |- |
| Line 1,369: |
Line 1,375: |
| | |2023 | | |2023 |
| | |PG | | |PG |
| − | |An extremely woke version of the 1953 animated film, starting with the race swapping of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, as well as both the race and gender swapping of the Lost Boys. Tiger Lilly who was previously portrayed as a damsel in distress is now portrayed as a warrior. There is even more [[feminism]], with Wendy not having any maternal instincts instead fighting Captain Hook, and the women not fighting over Peter Pan’s affections. The mermaids are completed downgraded barely even appearing in the film, The film was also not vibrantly colorful, as like the original film. | + | |An extremely woke version of the 1953 animated film, starting with the race swapping of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, as well as both the race and gender swapping of some of the Lost Boys. Strong [[feminism]], with Wendy not having any maternal instincts instead fighting Captain Hook. Tiger Lilly whom was previously portrayed as a damsel in distress is now portrayed as a warrior. As well as none of girls not fighting over Peter Pan’s affections, in fact Wendy slaps Peter Pan at one point. The mermaids are completed downgraded barely even appearing in the film, The film was also not vibrantly colorful, as like the original film. |
| | |N/A | | |N/A |
| | |- | | |- |