Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
add citation to the study
Line 30: Line 30:  
|"The founders of Conservapedia.com say that the site offers a 'much-needed alternative' to Wikipedia, which they believe is 'increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American,'" as reported in ''[[The Guardian]]''.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2007/mar/01/wikipedia.news</ref>
 
|"The founders of Conservapedia.com say that the site offers a 'much-needed alternative' to Wikipedia, which they believe is 'increasingly anti-Christian and anti-American,'" as reported in ''[[The Guardian]]''.<ref>https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2007/mar/01/wikipedia.news</ref>
 
|[[Liberal logic]] falsely pretends that because anyone can edit [[Wikipedia]] (and quickly be reverted if the edits are not [[liberal]]), then it is not biased.
 
|[[Liberal logic]] falsely pretends that because anyone can edit [[Wikipedia]] (and quickly be reverted if the edits are not [[liberal]]), then it is not biased.
−
|A study by the Manhattan Institute proves extensive and pervasive [[liberal bias]] at Wikipedia.
+
|A study by the Manhattan Institute proves extensive and pervasive [[liberal bias]] at Wikipedia.<ref>https://manhattan.institute/article/new-study-finds-political-bias-embedded-in-wikipedia-articles</ref>
 
|June 20, 2024
 
|June 20, 2024
 
|-
 
|-
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,527

edits

Navigation menu