Changes

"Due to your whitewashing of Palestinian terror and the propagation of half-truths, your readers are hardly aware of these Jihadist organizations’ existence, let alone the constant threat they pose to Israel. In the future, if Israel is again forced to defend itself against indiscriminate Palestinian rocket fire on our homefront, whether from Gaza or Lebanon, your readership will unknowingly infer that Israel is the aggressor, despite the exact opposite being true. Through this deceitful coverage, The Times not only twists the truth but also incentivizes terrorism."

"Due to your whitewashing of Palestinian terror and the propagation of half-truths, your readers are hardly aware of these Jihadist organizations’ existence, let alone the constant threat they pose to Israel. In the future, if Israel is again forced to defend itself against indiscriminate Palestinian rocket fire on our homefront, whether from Gaza or Lebanon, your readership will unknowingly infer that Israel is the aggressor, despite the exact opposite being true. Through this deceitful coverage, The Times not only twists the truth but also incentivizes terrorism."

 "As you are aware, antisemitism is rising at a terrifying rate," Erdan continued.  "Much of today’s violent Jew-hatred takes the form of Israel-hatred. And part of the blame for this growing bigotry lays on your shoulders. The New York Times’ libelous narratives are actively contributing to the growing hatred of my country, and as a result, your publication plays a role in endangering Jews around the globe."

"As you are aware, antisemitism is rising at a terrifying rate," Erdan continued.  "Much of today’s violent Jew-hatred takes the form of Israel-hatred. And part of the blame for this growing bigotry lays on your shoulders. The New York Times’ libelous narratives are actively contributing to the growing hatred of my country, and as a result, your publication plays a role in endangering Jews around the globe."

The Gray Lady was already under fire for 'pushing antisemitic tropes'

The Gray Lady was already under fire for 'pushing antisemitic tropes'

Article:  'Ferocious’ [sic] Israel, ‘Rabidly Partisan’ Adelson.' 'For a telltale indicator of New York Times bias, keep an eye on the adjectives and adverbs. Two recent front-page Times articles offer examples of this particular problem skewing the coverage. A Times article purporting to show how Israelis “feel little sympathy” for Gazans suffering includes the line, “Michael Zigdon, who operates a small food shack in Netivot’s rundown market and had employed two men from Gaza until the attack, expressed little sympathy for Gazans, who have endured a ferocious Israeli military onslaught for the past eight months.” The “ferocious” adjective gets hurled by the Times a second time in the same article, which goes on, in case any reader failed to absorb the point the first time, to say that “the death toll in Gaza has spiraled to at least 37,000 since Israel began its ferocious offensive.”

Article:  'Ferocious’ [sic] Israel, ‘Rabidly Partisan’ Adelson.' 'For a telltale indicator of New York Times bias, keep an eye on the adjectives and adverbs. Two recent front-page Times articles offer examples of this particular problem skewing the coverage. A Times article purporting to show how Israelis “feel little sympathy” for Gazans suffering includes the line, “Michael Zigdon, who operates a small food shack in Netivot’s rundown market and had employed two men from Gaza until the attack, expressed little sympathy for Gazans, who have endured a ferocious Israeli military onslaught for the past eight months.” The “ferocious” adjective gets hurled by the Times a second time in the same article, which goes on, in case any reader failed to absorb the point the first time, to say that “the death toll in Gaza has spiraled to at least 37,000 since Israel began its ferocious offensive.”

The Israeli self-defense operation gets described by the Times as “ferocious,” [“a ferocious Israeli military onslaught”] while the Hamas attack of Oct. 7 earns no such label. My Webster’s Second defines ferocious as “having or exhibiting ferocity, cruelty, savagery, etc; violently cruel.” Ferocity is defined as coming from the Latin root ferus, meaning wild, “as the ferocity of barbarians.” That qualifies as slander of Israel, opinion masquerading as New York Times news writing. If the Times news writers and editors want to accuse Israel of waging barbaric, savage...'<ref>[https://www.algemeiner.com/2024/06/28/jewish-leader-slams-new-york-times-dreadful-bias-paper-faults-ferocious-israel-rabidly-partisan-adelson/ Ferocious’ (sic) Israel, ‘Rabidly Partisan’ Adelson]. Ny Ira Stoll, ''Algemeiner'', June 28, 2024</ref>

The Israeli self-defense operation gets described by the Times as “ferocious,” [“a ferocious Israeli military onslaught”] while the Hamas attack of Oct. 7 earns no such label. My Webster’s Second defines ferocious as “having or exhibiting ferocity, cruelty, savagery, etc; violently cruel.” Ferocity is defined as coming from the Latin root ferus, meaning wild, “as the ferocity of barbarians.” That qualifies as slander of Israel, opinion masquerading as New York Times news writing. If the Times news writers and editors want to accuse Israel of waging barbaric, savage...'<ref>[https://www.algemeiner.com/2024/06/28/jewish-leader-slams-new-york-times-dreadful-bias-paper-faults-ferocious-israel-rabidly-partisan-adelson/ Ferocious’ (sic) Israel, ‘Rabidly Partisan’ Adelson]. Ny Ira Stoll, ''Algemeiner'', June 28, 2024</ref>

===Whitewashing hate (at 'swastika palestine' protests)===

===Whitewashing hate (at 'swastika palestine' protests)===