Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 17:11, June 23, 2007

760 bytes added ,  17:11, June 23, 2007
→‎numbers 18, 21, 22, 37
Line 199: Line 199:     
I don't mean to criticize, but if this is to be taken seriously, we should probably weed out errors or things which are outdated - otherwise, it might look like a bunch of random people smearing something they don't like, regardless of any weaknesses in Wikipedia which may exist. [[User:Aristotle|Aristotle]] 12:03, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
 
I don't mean to criticize, but if this is to be taken seriously, we should probably weed out errors or things which are outdated - otherwise, it might look like a bunch of random people smearing something they don't like, regardless of any weaknesses in Wikipedia which may exist. [[User:Aristotle|Aristotle]] 12:03, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Criticisms are welcome, and I've clarified the entry in response to your points as follows:
 +
 +
:: Point 18 is made stronger as the result of your link, which proves that Wikipedia does not warn about specifically images of sexual activities, pornography, or adult content.
 +
 +
:: Point 21 is unchanged, as Wikipedia does repeat an absurd claim of Jesus deniers.  Would Wikipedia do likewise in a serious entry about the Holocaust, and give credibility to claims of Holocaust deniers?  I hope not.
 +
 +
:: Point 22 is updated to reflect Wikipedia's backhanded reference to Christianity in its Renaissance entry.
 +
 +
:: Point 27, 1.5 was changed to 1.8.  This does not alter the point here.
 +
 +
: Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:11, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/206539"

Navigation menu