Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
293,467
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 18:
Line 18: − − === Alvin Plantinga's ontological argument === − − *[https://edwardfeser.blogspot.com/2010/12/plantingas-ontological-argument.html Plantinga’s ontological argument] − *[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbY05GupB78 Plantinga's Modal Ontological Argument Explained ], video
Reverted edits by Conservative (talk) to last revision by RobSmith
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy states the following regarding recent developments in ontological arguments for the existence of God:
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy states the following regarding recent developments in ontological arguments for the existence of God:
{{cquote|In more recent times, [[Kurt Gödel]], Charles Hartshorne, Norman Malcolm and [[Alvin Plantinga]] have all presented much-discussed ontological arguments which bear interesting connections to the earlier arguments of St. Anselm, [[Rene Descartes|Descartes]] and [[Gottfried Leibniz|Leibniz]]. Of these, the most interesting are those of Gödel and Plantinga; in these cases, however, it is unclear whether we should really say that these authors claim that the arguments are proofs of the existence of God.<ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments/</ref>}}
{{cquote|In more recent times, [[Kurt Gödel]], Charles Hartshorne, Norman Malcolm and [[Alvin Plantinga]] have all presented much-discussed ontological arguments which bear interesting connections to the earlier arguments of St. Anselm, [[Rene Descartes|Descartes]] and [[Gottfried Leibniz|Leibniz]]. Of these, the most interesting are those of Gödel and Plantinga; in these cases, however, it is unclear whether we should really say that these authors claim that the arguments are proofs of the existence of God.<ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments/</ref>}}
== Criticism ==
== Criticism ==