Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,427
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 218:
Line 218: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
email is not working so here is the reply
I sent the email I sent you to about 5 or so other key people that I know are actively involved in Conservapedia. I couldn't email some important users as their email is not active (for example, sharon) Can you email blast the other sysops regarding the info I sent you since you seem to know how to email blast using the system? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
I sent the email I sent you to about 5 or so other key people that I know are actively involved in Conservapedia. I couldn't email some important users as their email is not active (for example, sharon) Can you email blast the other sysops regarding the info I sent you since you seem to know how to email blast using the system? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
== email is not working so here is the reply ==
Dear Terry,
I think the main point is that we are very shallow on footnotes. If we are going to be a concise encyclopedia it is all the more important we have footnotes and external links so people can get more info. Right now, our encyclopedia is rather unusable except for certain hot button "culture war" issues like creationism vs. evolution, abortion, etc. Citing also forces people to put down more reliable info. Sooner of later the liberals are going to do a study on Conservapedia in terms of accuracy and it is important we fix the problem now.
Do you approve of the use of the template?
Sincerely,
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:24, 23 June 2007 (EDT)