Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎D. James Kennedy: right, and welcome!
Line 231: Line 231:  
And in the spirit of full disclosure, that addition to Kennedy's article is what drove me to leave Wikipedia.  I argued against it (quite well, if I may be so bold) and got ganged up on by at least three liberal editors who used their combined efforts to "game the system" and dodge Wiki's "3 reverts rule."  I watched my edits so as not to run afoul of the 3RR, but was still found in violation of it despite not having more than three reverts in 24 hours because I was watching my edits!  (Someone explain that one to me.)  
 
And in the spirit of full disclosure, that addition to Kennedy's article is what drove me to leave Wikipedia.  I argued against it (quite well, if I may be so bold) and got ganged up on by at least three liberal editors who used their combined efforts to "game the system" and dodge Wiki's "3 reverts rule."  I watched my edits so as not to run afoul of the 3RR, but was still found in violation of it despite not having more than three reverts in 24 hours because I was watching my edits!  (Someone explain that one to me.)  
 
[[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 00:33, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
 
[[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 00:33, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: I'll add this to the next update the [[Bias in Wikipedia]] list, probably tomorrow.  Your comments here are right on target.  I just returned from a conference where a leading ID scientist drew the same distinctions that you have.  The [[liberals]] at Wikipedia no longer surprise me in their bias and unwillingness to accept basic logic.  Welcome to Conservapedia, where logic is respected.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:45, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
    
== Midge Potts ==
 
== Midge Potts ==
    
A cross-dressing man who has not undergone conventional hormone therapy and has not had sex change surgery is referred to as "she/her" on Wikipedia because he "identifies as a woman."  I confronted this liberal nonsense [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Midge_Potts#Status_of_Potts.27_gender_alteration_and_pronouns here] with no liberals being able to successfully counter my arguments.  Still, the article has been continually reverted to the version with female pronouns. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 00:41, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
 
A cross-dressing man who has not undergone conventional hormone therapy and has not had sex change surgery is referred to as "she/her" on Wikipedia because he "identifies as a woman."  I confronted this liberal nonsense [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Midge_Potts#Status_of_Potts.27_gender_alteration_and_pronouns here] with no liberals being able to successfully counter my arguments.  Still, the article has been continually reverted to the version with female pronouns. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 00:41, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,899

edits

Navigation menu