SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
8,856
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 22:
Line 22: − +
Anders v. California (view source)
Revision as of 18:18, September 10, 2024
, 18:18, September 10, 2024→Anders Brief
Some states have modified the requirements, such as not permitting the attorney to withdraw (but not subjecting him/her to sanctions for filing frivolous briefs).
Some states have modified the requirements, such as not permitting the attorney to withdraw (but not subjecting him/her to sanctions for filing frivolous briefs).
The Oregon courts noted an anomaly with the Anders decision: if an attorney argues there are ''no'' non-frivolous grounds, the court must then review the ''entire'' court record for potential error; if an attorney raises ''any'' ground for error (even one), then the court only reviews ''that portion of the record'' and not the entirety of it.
The Oregon courts noted an anomaly with the Anders decision: if an attorney argues there are ''no'' non-frivolous grounds, the court must then review the ''entire'' court record for potential error; if an attorney raises ''any'' ground for error (even if only a single one), then the court only reviews ''that portion of the record'' and not the entirety of it.
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]