Changes

|2019

|2019

|PG-13

|PG-13

|From producer [[James Cameron]] and director [[Robert Rodriguez]], this American film loosely based on the Japanese manga with the same name supports [[feminism]], [[environmentalism]], [[illegal immigration]] and [[anti-capitalism]], as the villains of the film are depicted as wealthy slavers who live above the poor ghettos, whereas the heroes are violent street thugs who hate money.

|From producer [[James Cameron]] and director [[Robert Rodriguez]], this American film loosely based on the Japanese manga with the same name supports [[feminism]], [[environmentalism]], [[illegal immigration]] and [[anti-capitalism]], as the villains of the film are depicted as wealthy slavers who live above the poor ghettos. In contrast, the heroes are violent street thugs who hate money.

|$404,800,000

|$404,800,000

|-

|-

|2010

|2010

|PG

|PG

|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct based on the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can also be seen as pro-environmentalist because some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries instead of caribou, despite wolves being natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are painted in an elitist light for being determined and hardworking. One female wolf named Kate can be described as a modern feminist. Similar to the other liberal film, ''Open Season,'' it spawned multiple unneeded direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film called ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', only in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series called ''Back at the Barnyard'' instead of film sequels.

|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct based on the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can also be seen as pro-environmentalist because some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries instead of caribou, despite wolves being natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are painted in an elitist light for being determined and hardworking. One female wolf named Kate can be described as a modern feminist. Similar to the other liberal film, ''Open Season,'' it spawned multiple unneeded direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film called ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', but in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series called ''Back at the Barnyard'' instead of film sequels.

|$25,107,267

|$25,107,267

|-

|-

|2010

|2010

|PG

|PG

|A goofy meerkat and a pacifistic lion journey with other animals from around the world (a polar bear, two tortoises, a kangaroo, a Tasmanian devil, and a rooster) to take down a dam built by humans, which had caused the Okavango Delta to dry up. This movie, based on a children's book, promotes a heavy environmentalist message, with the animals saying that all humans are causing bad things to happen worldwide (like causing a polar bear's snowy home to melt and letting the Outback catch on fire). The ending of the movie amps the environmental message up to eleven, with many animals storming the cities and news reporters saying that the animals are going to make humans pay for ruining the world.

|A goofy meerkat and a pacifistic lion journey with other animals from around the world (a polar bear, two tortoises, a kangaroo, a Tasmanian devil, and a rooster) to take down a dam built by humans, which had caused the Okavango Delta to dry up. This movie, based on a children's book, promotes a heavy environmentalist message, with the animals saying that all humans are causing bad things to happen worldwide (like causing a polar bear's snowy home to melt and letting the Outback catch on fire). The movie's ending amps the environmental message up to eleven, with many animals storming the cities and news reporters saying that the animals will make humans pay for ruining the world.

|£2,133,051

|£2,133,051

|-

|-

|1998

|1998

|G

|G

|This film, unlike the other three ''American Tail'' films, definitely has a liberal bent.  Not only does it vilify businessmen (though it, I suppose, was mocking the Robber Barons and might have had some merit in that regard.)  What is harder to excuse pushing the point of white/European guilt of what happened to the Native Americans, even making Fievel, who himself fled from a bad situation in Russia, somehow feel responsible for the plight of the Native American mice.  This film and the negative reception were ultimately responsible for the death of the ''American Tail'' franchise.  

|This film, unlike the other three ''American Tail'' films, definitely has a liberal bent.  Not only does it vilify businessmen (though it, I suppose, was mocking the Robber Barons and might have had some merit in that regard.)  What is harder to excuse is pushing the point of white/European guilt of what happened to the Native Americans, even making Fievel, who himself fled from a bad situation in Russia, somehow feel responsible for the plight of the Native American mice.  This film and the negative reception were ultimately responsible for the death of the ''American Tail'' franchise.  

|N/A (direct to video)  

|N/A (direct to video)  

|-     

|-     

|''The Ant Bully''

|''The Ant Bully''

|2006

|2006

|PG

|PG

|This pro-Communist film's main message of the power of the individual to be more powerful than one another is a bad thing. The exterminator, apparently the main antagonist, is vilified for simply doing his job, thus giving the animation an environmentalist message.

|This pro-Communist film's main message of the power of the individual to be more powerful than one another is portrayed as a good thing. The exterminator, apparently the main antagonist, is vilified for simply doing his job, thus giving the animation an environmentalist message.

|$28,142,535

|$28,142,535

|-

|-

|2006

|2006

|PG

|PG

|Set on a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of real humans, this ''Lion King'' clone stars a bull who witnesses his father die after being wounded by coyotes, then gradually accepts the responsibilities that come with being the leader of his animal community. Nevertheless, ''Barnyard'' accepts disorderly conduct because the animals still party recklessly, even with a serious, dedicated bull in charge. Plus, it portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid and persecutes coyotes for being carnivores. The neurotic ferret Freddy goes to liberal lengths to avoid temptation to eat his rooster friend by becoming a [[vegetarianism|vegetarian]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and [[gambling]].

|Set in a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of actual humans, this ''Lion King'' clone stars a bull who witnesses his father die after being wounded by coyotes, then he gradually accepts the responsibilities that come with being the leader of his animal community. Nevertheless, ''Barnyard'' accepts disorderly conduct because the animals still party recklessly, even with a serious and dedicated bull in charge. Plus, it portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid and persecutes coyotes for being carnivores. The neurotic ferret Freddy goes to liberal lengths to avoid the temptation to eat his rooster friend by becoming a [[vegetarianism|vegetarian]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and [[gambling]].

|$116,500,000

|$116,500,000

|-

|-

|2012

|2012

|PG

|PG

|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup regardless of the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film and being created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. Also has a similar setting to Great Conservative Film ''How to Train Your Dragon'', which was released two years before.

|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup regardless of the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film and being created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. It also has a setting similar to the Great Conservative Film ''How to Train Your Dragon'', released two years before.

|$540.4 million  

|$540.4 million  

|-

|-

|2005

|2005

|G

|G

|This painfully unoriginal animation, which was adapted from a 1943 World War II propaganda short by conservative filmmaker Walt Disney (which was itself adapted from one of Aesop's fables), ridicules family values, especially when the title chicken's widower father, Buck "Ace" Cluck, is shown to be willing to disown his son. Later on, when the aliens proceed to attempt to invade and detonate Earth, it is simply because they thought it is a living organism that kidnapped one of their children. The film is borderline nihilistic because the townspeople are mean-spirited and frequently bully Chicken Little, and a brief gag implies that warping someone's mind against their will is acceptable. As one of the worst theatrical productions ever made by the Walt Disney Company under [[Michael Eisner]] (both critics and audiences agree on this), and even the very first Walt Disney Animation Studios' full-length feature completely animated in 3D (so not exactly a good start), the film's mean-spirited and deeply cynical plot line is suspected to have been done to compete with [[DreamWorks]] animated films helmed by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]].

|This painfully unoriginal animation, which was adapted from a 1943 World War II propaganda short by conservative filmmaker Walt Disney (which was itself adapted from one of Aesop's fables), ridicules family values, especially when the title chicken's widower father, Buck "Ace" Cluck, is shown to be willing to disown his son. Later on, when the aliens proceed to attempt to invade and detonate Earth, it is simply because they thought it was a living organism that kidnapped one of their children. The film is borderline nihilistic because the townspeople are mean-spirited and frequently bully Chicken Little, and a brief gag implies that warping someone's mind against their will is acceptable. As one of the worst theatrical productions ever made by the Walt Disney Company under [[Michael Eisner]] (both critics and audiences agree on this), and even the very first Walt Disney Animation Studios' full-length feature completely animated in 3D (so not exactly a good start), the film's mean-spirited and deeply cynical plot line is suspected to have been done to compete with [[DreamWorks]] animated films helmed by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]].

|$135,386,665

|$135,386,665

|-

|-

|2012

|2012

|PG

|PG

|A leopard cub and his mother in India join a gang of animals (a bear, a monkey, and a pet parrot) in their journey to Delhi to make the humans stop destroying their homes. This movie is very environmentalist, with examples being the parrot Alex pleading with the humans to "share the world" with the animals, which results in laws of environmentalism being passed and apartment buildings being canceled.

|A leopard cub and his mother in India join a gang of animals (a bear, a monkey, and a pet parrot) on their journey to Delhi to make the humans stop destroying their homes. This movie is very environmentalist, with examples of the parrot Alex pleading with humans to "share the world" with animals, which results in environmentalist laws being passed and apartment buildings being canceled.

|$3.10 million

|$3.10 million

|-

|-

|2017

|2017

|PG (Should be PG-13 for multiple references to the dreaded S-word in profanity)

|PG (Should be PG-13 for multiple references to the dreaded S-word in profanity)

|Not only is this film clearly an infomercial for various smartphone applications and features thinly disguised as an unoriginal take on the "hero's journey" story archetype, but it appears to devalue human language: the main teenager Alex can only win over his crush by communicating via text messages comprised exclusively of emojis, and a background teenager even says, "Words aren't cool". Openly homosexual writer and director Anthony "Tony" Leondis considers the movie a deeply personal project for him: the main character is a sentient emoji who is different from his friends with his ability to show multiple expressions, which reflects Leondis' laughable belief that he is an outcast when, in reality, Hollywood praises that sort of sinful sexuality. The film briefly glorifies [[Facebook]], the world's largest social network and a hotbed for narcissism and relationship destruction; gives minor lip service to feminism in the form of Jailbreak, a computer hacker girl emoji who refuses to be the princess emoji she was created to be; and has been unfavorably compared to ''Wreck-It Ralph'' and ''Inside Out'', two great conservative animations, plus the ambiguously conservative ''LEGO Movie''.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydvQB-4bBfQ</ref> Worst of all, TJ Miller, who voices the lead emoji, once said the film is a subtle protest against [[Donald Trump]] based on allegations that Trump wants to censor Hollywood and other liberally biased media.

|Not only is this film clearly an infomercial for various smartphone applications and features thinly disguised as an unoriginal take on the "hero's journey" story archetype, but it appears to devalue human language: the main teenager Alex can only win over his crush by communicating via text messages comprised exclusively of emojis, and a background teenager even says, "Words aren't cool." Openly homosexual writer and director Anthony "Tony" Leondis considers the movie a deeply personal project for him: the main character is a sentient emoji who is different from his friends with his ability to show multiple expressions, which reflects Leondis' laughable belief that he is an outcast when, in reality, Hollywood praises that sort of sinful sexuality. The film briefly glorifies [[Facebook]], the world's largest social network and a hotbed for narcissism and relationship destruction; it gives minor lip service to feminism in the form of Jailbreak, a computer hacker girl emoji who refuses to be the princess emoji she was created to be; and has been unfavorably compared to ''Wreck-It Ralph'' and ''Inside Out'', two great conservative animations, plus the ambiguously conservative ''LEGO Movie''.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydvQB-4bBfQ</ref> Worst of all, TJ Miller, who voices the lead emoji, once said the film is a subtle protest against [[Donald Trump]] based on allegations that Trump wants to censor Hollywood and other liberally biased media.

|$25,650,000

|$25,650,000

|-

|-

|1997

|1997

|R

|R

|With Shinji Ikari failing to do his duty until his boss (Misato Kasuragi) and partner (Asuka Langley Soryu) were killed, along with Shinji masturbating over Asuka earlier, we have one of the most depressing movies ever made which ends with the destruction of the world.

|With Shinji Ikari failing to do his duty until his boss (Misato Kasuragi) and partner (Asuka Langley Soryu) were killed, along with Shinji masturbating over Asuka earlier, we have one of the most depressing movies ever made, which ends with the destruction of the world.

|$19,000,000

|$19,000,000

|-

|-

|1999

|1999

|Not Rated

|Not Rated

|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making a statement against the whaling industry. It even has a sequel in 2004, which is not only horrific but is also flat-out bizarre.

|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making a statement against the whaling industry. It even has a sequel in 2004, which is not only horrible but also flat-out bizarre.

|

|

|-

|-

|2015

|2015

|PG

|PG

|This spinoff prequel to the ''Despicable Me'' films begins with the "evolution" of the minions, which flies in the face of the creationist truth. The film shows the minions evolving from single cell organisms in the ocean, suggesting that God does not exist. This film also glorifies criminality. Not to mention it seems to sympathize with a family that has robbed a bank, an action which is congruent with the liberal idea of not working hard for wealth. A sequel was released in 2022 called ''The Rise of Gru''.

|This spinoff prequel to the ''Despicable Me'' films begins with the "evolution" of the minions, which flies in the face of the creationist truth. The film shows the minions evolving from single-cell organisms in the ocean, suggesting that God does not exist. This film also glorifies criminality. Not to mention it seems to sympathize with a family that has robbed a bank, an action which is congruent with the liberal idea of not working hard for wealth. A sequel was released in 2022 called ''The Rise of Gru''.

|$1.159 billion

|$1.159 billion

|-

|-

|2006

|2006

|PG

|PG

|Although conservative star Gary Sinise appears, environmentalism and hate speech against hunters runs rampant. It had gotten three sequels since, each lowering in quality.

|Although conservative star Gary Sinise appears, environmentalism and hate speech against hunters run rampant. It had gotten three sequels since then, each lowering in quality.

|$85,105,259   

|$85,105,259   

|-

|-

|2006

|2006

|PG

|PG

|Based upon the comic strip of the same name, animals who are struggling to steal food from trash for the winter are the heroes, while humans are painted as ignorant, uncaring towards animals (clearly an environmentalist message), and obsessed with food. Plus, a businesswoman is the main antagonist, and an exterminator is scorned for simply doing his job. In addition, one of the other main antagonists of the film (and the only animal main antagonist), Vincent the Bear, is villainized for forcing RJ the Raccoon to replace the food he had after the latter in a botched attempt to steal food that Vincent had hoarded for the winter ended up accidentally destroying the food stash, with an ad-libbed scene in the climax having Vincent admit that he got where he was by "backstabbing, betraying, and murdering" those that placed trust in him, which can be interpreted as a dig against Capitalism and the concept of private property.

|Based upon the comic strip of the same name, animals struggling to steal food from trash for the winter are the heroes. At the same time, humans are painted as ignorant, uncaring towards animals (clearly an environmentalist message), and obsessed with food. Plus, a businesswoman is the main antagonist, and an exterminator is scorned for simply doing his job. In addition, one of the other main antagonists of the film (and the only animal main antagonist), Vincent the Bear, is villainized for forcing RJ the Raccoon to replace the food he had after the latter in a botched attempt to steal food that Vincent had hoarded for the winter ended up accidentally destroying the food stash, with an ad-libbed scene in the climax having Vincent admit that he got where he was by "backstabbing, betraying, and murdering" those that placed trust in him, which can be interpreted as a dig against Capitalism and the concept of private property.

|$155,019,340

|$155,019,340

|-

|-

|2018

|2018

|G

|G

|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged under the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic" that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel titled ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'' was released in 2021.

|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged under the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic" that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel - ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'' - was released in 2021.

|$146,983,492

|$146,983,492

|-

|-

|1995

|1995

|G

|G

|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism. Also, unlike the film character who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men.  

|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism. Also, unlike the film character, who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men.  

Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-than-expected box office receipts.

Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-than-expected box office receipts.

|1998

|1998

|G

|G

|This revisionist take on Arthurian legend throws everything that makes the source material great (Christianity, heroism, bravery, etc.) out the window for the sake of advocating feminism and wanting to be as worthy a Disney animated musical film (Its from Warner Bros), only to be panned by critics in the end. Even though it's supposed to be a G-rated family comedy, an incest joke appears as well.<ref>https://www.imdb.com/character/ch0100869/quotes</ref>

|This revisionist take on Arthurian legend throws everything that makes the source material great (Christianity, heroism, bravery, etc.) out the window for the sake of advocating feminism and wanting to be as worthy a Disney animated musical film (Warner Bros produced this film), only to be panned by critics in the end. Even though it's supposed to be a G-rated family comedy, an incest joke appears as well.<ref>https://www.imdb.com/character/ch0100869/quotes</ref>

|$22,510,798

|$22,510,798

|-

|-

|2016

|2016

|R

|R

|As the first R-rated American animated film to be released by a major film studio in the United States following 1999's ''South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut'', ''Sausage Party'' blatantly criticizes religion and deceives audiences into think that, without religion and the existence of God, everyone can enjoy the most selfish, crude, and debauched activities (e.g. humanism, homosexuality, obscenity, and non-stop sexual intercourse) without guilt or a sense of a "religious obligation". Made by Nitrogen Studios. A typical offensive and raunchy comedy film by modern Hollywood standards, directors Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan, producer Megan Ellison, producer/writer Evan Goldberg, and producer/writer/actor Seth Rogen (all of them fiercely liberal and some, ironically, of Jewish origin) made this film to bastardize the animation genre, as well as to push the liberal Hollywood agenda on politics and religion. Animated feature films, for the past century, have enthralled and enhanced audiences around the world, as the best ones tell timely stories that children, teenagers, and adults alike can relate to and enjoy. The makers of ''Sausage Party'' seemed to not care about any of this, as they made this untimely film strictly for adults, as they believed that there aren't and should be any animated films for adults only to enjoy. Their warped belief is made very clear by the film's criticism and parody of many other animated films (namely Disney animations) as well as the presence of regular Disney collaborator Alan Menken as the film's songwriter. Altogether, ''Sausage Party'' is painfully unfunny and has virtually no plot or philosophical merit. Upon release, only liberally biased film critics praised the film, while general audiences were repulsed by it.

|As the first R-rated American animated film to be released by a major film studio in the United States following 1999's ''South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut'', ''Sausage Party'' blatantly criticizes religion and deceives audiences into thinking that, without religion and the existence of God, everyone can enjoy the most selfish, crude, and debauched activities (e.g. humanism, homosexuality, obscenity, and non-stop sexual intercourse) without guilt or a sense of a "religious obligation". Made by Nitrogen Studios. A typical offensive and raunchy comedy film by modern Hollywood standards, directors Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan, producer Megan Ellison, producer/writer Evan Goldberg, and producer/writer/actor Seth Rogen (all of them fiercely liberal and some, ironically, of Jewish origin) made this film to bastardize the animation genre, as well as to push the liberal Hollywood agenda on politics and religion. For the past century, animated feature films have enthralled and enhanced audiences worldwide, as the best ones tell timely stories that children, teenagers, and adults alike can relate to and enjoy. The makers of ''Sausage Party'' seemed to not care about any of this, as they made this untimely film strictly for adults and believed that there aren't and should be any animated films for adults only to enjoy. Their warped belief is made very clear by the film's criticism and parody of many other animated films (namely Disney animations) and the presence of regular Disney collaborator Alan Menken as the film's songwriter. Altogether, ''Sausage Party'' is painfully unfunny and has virtually no plot or philosophical merit. Only liberally biased film critics praised the film upon release, while general audiences were repulsed by it.

On a side note, ''Sausage Party'' has attracted a great deal of criticism on two additional issues. First, the animators worked under poor, cruel conditions and were forced by the directors to work overtime without pay. Thirty-six of the 83 animators were blacklisted and went uncredited in the film, believed to be due to their complaints; comments made in anonymous interviews of some of the animators involved in the project by ''Variety'', ''The Washington Post'', and ''The Hollywood Reporter'' alleged that the comments were accurate. All the animators in the film were told outright that they would be blacklisted if they did not work overtime without pay. Second, a red-band trailer for the film was accidentally played before a showing of the Walt Disney Pictures/Pixar Animation Studios' PG-rated and family-oriented ''Finding Dory'', at a Concord, California multiplex in mid-June 2016.<ref>http://ew.com/article/2016/06/29/theater-plays-sausage-party-trailer-before-finding-dory-apologizes/</ref> The theater staff had forgotten to switch out an adult-audience trailer roll for one meant for G and PG-rated films, when adding additional screens to carry ''Finding Dory'' to meet audience demand. The incident occurred only once, and the theater apologized, while Rogen [[Twitter|tweeted]] that the story "made his day".  

On a side note, ''Sausage Party'' has attracted much criticism on two additional issues. First, the animators worked under poor, cruel conditions and were forced by the directors to work overtime without pay. Thirty-six of the 83 animators were blacklisted and went uncredited in the film, believed to be due to their complaints; comments made in anonymous interviews of some of the animators involved in the project by ''Variety'', ''The Washington Post'', and ''The Hollywood Reporter'' alleged that the comments were accurate. All the animators in the film were told outright that they would be blacklisted if they did not work overtime without pay. Second, a red-band trailer for the film was accidentally played before a showing of the Walt Disney Pictures/Pixar Animation Studios' PG-rated and family-oriented ''Finding Dory'', at a Concord, California multiplex in mid-June 2016.<ref>http://ew.com/article/2016/06/29/theater-plays-sausage-party-trailer-before-finding-dory-apologizes/</ref> The theater staff had forgotten to switch out an adult-audience trailer roll for one meant for G and PG-rated films, when adding additional screens to carry ''Finding Dory'' to meet audience demand. The incident occurred only once, and the theater apologized, while Rogen [[Twitter|tweeted]] that the story "made his day".  

|$89,645,124

|$89,645,124

|-

|-

|2010

|2010

|G

|G

|Japanese anime film is about a tiny homeless family that steals from regular people. Demonizes capitalism and promotes redistribution of wealth.

|Japanese anime film is about a tiny homeless family that steals from regular people. Demonizes capitalism and promotes the redistribution of wealth.

|$19,202,743

|$19,202,743

|-

|-

|2022

|2022

|PG

|PG

|This pro-environmental Disney movie about an exploration family is also loaded with the LGBT agenda and identity politics. It has even gotten to the point where people have started walking out of the theater while the film was still playing.

|This pro-environmental Disney movie about an exploration family is also loaded with the LGBT agenda and identity politics. It even got to the point where people started walking out of the theater while the film was still playing.

|$18,600,000

|$18,600,000

|-

|-

|2023

|2023

|PG

|PG

|A 3D animated reboot film of the TMNT/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise produced by infamously [[woke]], mediocre, narcissistic and toxic actor [[Seth Rogen]], showing the iconic, popular and alluring character April O'Neil, who is classicly a Caucasian redheaded young woman of Irish-Scottish descents, as a cringe and deliberately blackwashed and obese teenager, another victim of modern liberal [[Hollywood]]'s anti-redhead/ginger racism and hatred and also its obesity promotion and propaganda with the misleading and deceitful term "body positivity". This is also the second time [[Nickelodeon]] blackwashed said character, the first time was in the short-lived TV series ''Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles''.

|A 3D animated reboot film of the TMNT/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise produced by infamously [[woke]], mediocre, narcissistic and toxic actor [[Seth Rogen]], showing the iconic, popular and alluring character April O'Neil, who is classicly a Caucasian redheaded young woman of Irish-Scottish descents, as a cringey and deliberately blackwashed and obese teenager, another victim of modern liberal [[Hollywood]]'s anti-redhead/ginger racism and hatred and also its obesity promotion and propaganda with the misleading and deceitful term "body positivity". This is also the second time [[Nickelodeon]] blackwashed said character, the first time was in the short-lived TV series ''Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles''.

|-

|-

|''Tentacolino'' (AKA ''In Search of the Titanic'')

|''Tentacolino'' (AKA ''In Search of the Titanic'')

|1994

|1994

|G

|G

|Considered by many to be Don Bluth's worst film, the movie stars a troll named Stanley exiled from the Land of Trolls for his love of growing flowers and ends up in Central Park, meeting two children. He also ends up being a little ''too'' happy with a little girl kissing him on the cheek. The end of the movie has an environmental message when Stanley causes plants to grow all over the city, potentially causing trouble for people in New York City. Even Don Bluth admitted that this was the worst movie he had created, a statement many directors in the 2020s would never admit with their recent flops.

|Considered by many to be Don Bluth's worst film, the movie stars a troll named Stanley, who is exiled from the Land of Trolls for his love of growing flowers. He ends up in Central Park, meeting two children. He also ends up being a little ''too'' happy with a little girl kissing him on the cheek. The movie's end has an environmental message when Stanley causes plants to grow all over the city, potentially causing trouble for people in New York City. Even Don Bluth admitted that this was the worst movie he had created, a statement many directors in the 2020s would never admit with their recent flops.

|$71,368

|$71,368

|-

|-

|2023

|2023

|PG

|PG

|The film has the hero (Asha) team up with a fallen star to stop the evil King Magnifico from not granting all the wishes that people give him. While Magnifico is the villain of this film, some viewers felt that he has a point in not granting every single wish; some of those wishes could be used for more nefarious purposes. Furthermore, the film says humans come from stardust, which goes against basic theology.

|The Walt Disney Company's 100th-anniversary film has the hero (Asha) team up with a fallen star to stop the evil King Magnifico from not granting all the wishes that people give him. While Magnifico is the villain of this film, some viewers feel that he has a point in not granting every single wish; some of those wishes could be used for more nefarious purposes. Furthermore, the film says humans come from stardust, which goes against basic theology.

| N/A (Has yet to be released)

| N/A (Has yet to be released)

|-

|-