nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Reverted edits by ABCDEFG (Talk); changed back to last version by Learn together
{{Protected|TK}}
== He is considered by many to be one of the greatest presidents ==
I'll freely admit that Bush Senior looks a LOT better now that we've seen Junior at work, but, seriously. You can say that about EVERY president except Millard Fillmore and it'd be true. Are there any non-Democrat presidents Conservapedia DOESN'T like? --[[User:Scrap|Scrap]] 01:40, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
I agree with you on most of your statement (except for the part about Junior at work.) We should avoid that kind of talk about Presidents. --[[User:Additioner]] 15:05, 25 April 2007
George, Sr. was a one term president, George, Jr, is polling equal to Jimmy Carter. I would not consider that one of the great political families. [[User:crshedd|crshedd]] May 6, 2007
*Well thank goodness they didn't do polling back in the days of the Adams men, eh? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 08:31, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
== Voodoo Economics... ==
Please read the articles. It is mentioned in the campaign section. Please refrain from repeating slogans. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 15:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
:No need to be snippy, TK, I didn't mean to hit a nerve. I don't see any mention of "voodoo economics" in the campaign section. I respectfully request that you restore the reference to the GHWB article.
:*Done. Sorry if you thought directness was snippy. I will try to watch that. --~ [[User:TK|<sup>Sysop-</sup>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 01:31, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
If by "directness" you are referring to your snide suggestion that I read the article, you are misusing the word. Unless you have evidence to the contrary, I would suggest you assume the contributor has read the article. Your comment was evidence that you had not read the article. I thought I was being rather charitable in referring to your comment as "snippy". And what exactly did you mean by "repeating slogans." Rather snide, wouldn't you say? Or condescending? Patronizing? --[[User:NItramNos|NitramNos]] 13:08, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
==Locked?==
Is this article locked? --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 08:41, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
*Yes, Will. That is why I added the template saying so is pasted right above. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 08:43, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
== Link ==
The North American Free Trade Agreement link doesn't work, as the article is titled [[NAFTA]] on conservapedia. The next time edits are allowed, it would be good to change this. ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:26, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
== He is considered by many to be one of the greatest presidents ==
I'll freely admit that Bush Senior looks a LOT better now that we've seen Junior at work, but, seriously. You can say that about EVERY president except Millard Fillmore and it'd be true. Are there any non-Democrat presidents Conservapedia DOESN'T like? --[[User:Scrap|Scrap]] 01:40, 17 March 2007 (EDT)
I agree with you on most of your statement (except for the part about Junior at work.) We should avoid that kind of talk about Presidents. --[[User:Additioner]] 15:05, 25 April 2007
George, Sr. was a one term president, George, Jr, is polling equal to Jimmy Carter. I would not consider that one of the great political families. [[User:crshedd|crshedd]] May 6, 2007
*Well thank goodness they didn't do polling back in the days of the Adams men, eh? --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 08:31, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
== Voodoo Economics... ==
Please read the articles. It is mentioned in the campaign section. Please refrain from repeating slogans. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 15:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
:No need to be snippy, TK, I didn't mean to hit a nerve. I don't see any mention of "voodoo economics" in the campaign section. I respectfully request that you restore the reference to the GHWB article.
:*Done. Sorry if you thought directness was snippy. I will try to watch that. --~ [[User:TK|<sup>Sysop-</sup>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 01:31, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
If by "directness" you are referring to your snide suggestion that I read the article, you are misusing the word. Unless you have evidence to the contrary, I would suggest you assume the contributor has read the article. Your comment was evidence that you had not read the article. I thought I was being rather charitable in referring to your comment as "snippy". And what exactly did you mean by "repeating slogans." Rather snide, wouldn't you say? Or condescending? Patronizing? --[[User:NItramNos|NitramNos]] 13:08, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
==Locked?==
Is this article locked? --[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 08:41, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
*Yes, Will. That is why I added the template saying so is pasted right above. --[[User:TK|<small>Sysop-</small>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 08:43, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
== Link ==
The North American Free Trade Agreement link doesn't work, as the article is titled [[NAFTA]] on conservapedia. The next time edits are allowed, it would be good to change this. ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 13:26, 21 May 2007 (EDT)