| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | The "universal ethic" is a set of moral rules that expresses natural moral law. If it exists, the universal ethic is a unique moral imperative for humanity. Its function is to provide the foundation for proper laws and policies. The claim for its existence is a set of criteria which the universal ethic should satisfy. The universal ethic has five basic rules:
| + | Allah Akbar |
| − | | |
| − | 1. A "benefit" is an act welcomed by the recipient.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 2. A "harm" is an act which directly and actually invades the legitimate domain of a victim.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 3. Acts which benefit others are good.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 4. All acts, and only those acts, which coercively harm others are evil.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 5. Acts which are neither good nor evil are morally neutral.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The criteria for the universal ethic are:
| |
| − | 1. The ethic should apply universally to all persons.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 2. The ethic should be comprehensive for all acts.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 3. The ethic should be logically consistent with the premises from which it is derived.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 4. The ethic should not be based merely on arbitrary beliefs, values, or on any particular culture or practice.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The premises from which the universal ethic are derived are those proposed by the British philosopher John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government. These are:
| |
| − | 1. Human beings are morally equal, having an equal moral worth, there being no inherent master-slave relationship in human biology.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 2. Human beings are independent in their thinking and feeling.
| |
| − | | |
| − | 3. Each person has a personal ethic by which acts are deemed to be good, evil, or neutral.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Reference==
| |
| − | :The Soul of Liberty, by Fred Foldvary.
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[category:philosophy]]
| |