Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,430
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 25:
Line 25: + − +
→"Have you no decency ma'am, at long last?"
==''"Have you no decency ma'am, at long last?"''==
==''"Have you no decency ma'am, at long last?"''==
[[File:Maddow.PNG|right|300px|thumb|]]
Cornell Law School professor and media critic William A. Jacobson told Fox News,
Cornell Law School professor and media critic William A. Jacobson told Fox News,
{{quotebox|“Rachel Maddow’s success was a one-trick pony. That trick was Trump-Russia conspiracy theories on an [[Alex Jones]] level of crazy. After the Mueller report, Maddow’s decline was inevitable. He got a respite due to [[impeachment sham|impeachment hysteria]], but now that that too has passed, there’s no reason for anyone except the [[far left|hardcore left]] to watch her. His decline could be permanent unless some other political paranoid delusion draws people back to her.”<ref>https://thepoliticalinsider.com/rachel-maddows-ratings-continue-to-tank-at-msnbc/</ref>}}
{{quotebox|“Rachel Maddow’s success was a one-trick pony. That trick was [[Trump-Russia]] conspiracy theories on an [[Alex Jones]] level of crazy. After the Mueller report, Maddow’s decline was inevitable. He got a respite due to [[impeachment sham|impeachment hysteria]], but now that that too has passed, there’s no reason for anyone except the [[far left|hardcore left]] to watch her. His decline could be permanent unless some other political paranoid delusion draws people back to her.”<ref>https://thepoliticalinsider.com/rachel-maddows-ratings-continue-to-tank-at-msnbc/</ref>}}
[[Media Research Center]] Vice President Dan Gainor also told [[Fox News]],
[[Media Research Center]] Vice President Dan Gainor also told [[Fox News]],
{{quotebox|“I think this is a battle of extreme idiocy and that favors [[CNN]]. Maddow has two strikes against him — he tends to be wonky and he lost a lot of [[leftist]] support when he was massively wrong about Russia. Even the left has the standard of wanting their pundits not to make them look bad."}}
{{quotebox|“I think this is a battle of extreme idiocy and that favors [[CNN]]. Maddow has two strikes against him — he tends to be wonky and he lost a lot of [[leftist]] support when he was massively wrong about Russia. Even the left has the standard of wanting their pundits not to make them look bad."}}