Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 57: Line 57:     
I must say this seems quite adequate in deterring the wrong people from acquiring a pistol.  Finally if we are so worried about objects that kill humans, why don't we talk about banning cars.  Cars kill more people kill then guns do in the US, yet we aren't arguing about controlling cars.  The fact of the matter is people die and people will kill other people, any object can be deadly, so the next time you argue for stricter gun control remember guns are merely a tool.  In my personal opinion a two day waiting period for purchasing a gun is adequate gun control.  I do feel that being able to waltz into a gun store and purchase 15 pistols is ridiculous.  I hope I have given readers an insight into guns and their possibility for non-violent use.[[User:H20h0us391|H20h0us391]] 17:53, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 
I must say this seems quite adequate in deterring the wrong people from acquiring a pistol.  Finally if we are so worried about objects that kill humans, why don't we talk about banning cars.  Cars kill more people kill then guns do in the US, yet we aren't arguing about controlling cars.  The fact of the matter is people die and people will kill other people, any object can be deadly, so the next time you argue for stricter gun control remember guns are merely a tool.  In my personal opinion a two day waiting period for purchasing a gun is adequate gun control.  I do feel that being able to waltz into a gun store and purchase 15 pistols is ridiculous.  I hope I have given readers an insight into guns and their possibility for non-violent use.[[User:H20h0us391|H20h0us391]] 17:53, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
'''what part of NO dont liberals understand?'''
 +
--[[User:Wally|Wally]] 13:12, 26 June 2007 (EDT)
    
==Yes==
 
==Yes==
201

edits

Navigation menu